Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm sure he's celebrating ..........................................in hell.Rot away douchebag.
I'm sure he's celebrating ..........................................in hell.Rot away douchebag.
One thing is for certain, Mao stepped on a lot of toes. Okay, it is more like hold people up and repeatedly punched them in the privates. Considering that after Mao is done with China. He created a industrial and military power house which competes with everyone for resource and market. Nowadays China swallows up half of the resources on the planet each year produces more industrial products then the next four countries combined. So understandably quite a few foreigners are going to hate his guts.
As for going to hell, Mao is an atheist and only believes China and its people.
Well, China couldn't of backed Ho Chi Minh because China wasn't a UN member at the time, plus if China did back Vietnam, both nations would be in the same path right now.I want to know why Mao Zedong did not support the re-unitification of Vietnam?
It is really tragic, especially for Vietnam. The history of China and Vietnam would have taken another path if China honestly backed Vietnam when Ho Chi Minh negotiated with the French and America on the negotiation table in Geneve.
Well, China couldn't of backed Ho Chi Minh because China wasn't a UN member at the time, plus if China did back Vietnam, both nations would be in the same path right now.
Sad that Ho passed away before Vietnam reunified. If Ho was still alive by the 70's and 80's, China and Vietnam would of been allies.Mao and Ho were good buddies, of course he supported the unification of Vietnam, but he and CPC didn't realize that Vietcong had became so ungrateful after the death of Ho.
ROC has killed 200 million Chinese during their 38 years of rule, both Beiyang and KMT were bad, but KMT was even worse than Beiyang.
KMT would make China half of its current size. With 1.4 billion population, what would be the future for Chinese people if our territory is reduced to less than 50%?
Without Mao, China would be one of US lapdogs, while US would still use Japan as another lapdog to make sure China wouldn't become too strong.
KMT sucks and fck Chiang Kai-Shek and his family!!!
Sad that Ho passed away before Vietnam reunified. If Ho was still alive by the 70's and 80's, China and Vietnam would of been allies.
Too bad that's not the case.
Prove your ROC kill 200 millions. Don lie.
Beiyang bad? KMT bad? You go back and study more.
Oh damn, what about princelings and your CCP chiefs?It's how you live the life that matters. Thank goodness, no chinese lives like slave under cast system.
Mao and Ho were good buddies, of course he supported the unification of Vietnam, but he and CPC didn't realize that Vietcong had became so ungrateful after the death of Ho.
Our PDF Viet members blamed China for betraying Vietnam by shaking hand with USA in 1972 and took Xisha islands from ROV in 1974.
But they didn't realize that once Ho passed away in 1969, Vietcong has immediately turned against China for USSR.
Before 1969, China even gave some territory to Vietnam.
China's population in 1911: 450 million
China's population in 1949: 450 million
No one-child policy implemented between 1911 to 1949, but why China's population has not increased at all?
Let's say Japanese killed 30 million and another 10 million died during the civil war, but this still cannot fill that hole.
And the average lifespan of 37 years and 90% of illiteracy, you can tell how bad this KMT government was actually.
We are not so stupid to let Mao and PRC play his dirty policy against independence against Vietnam.
You think we would conquer other nations when we never had a desire to conquer! We respect people, , where did Lord Buddha come from? we didn't need aggressive wars or some human driven lines, Lord Buddha has spread beyond what you can control in Asia.To be frank many Chinese will agree with you. How about trading Mao with Tibet? Or trading Mao with another Japanese invasion?
I think most Chinese would rather choose Mao.
Mao came at the time, that the window is closing for China to exert on Tibet. India got a head start in 1947.
In addition, from Beijing to Lhasa is 4000km, even longer to Mcmahon line and Aksai China and more 50% are mountains with few passes exceeding 5000m.
Without Mao, KMT may not be able to establish a foothold in time, and India with easier access through Nathu La and Assam plains would have conquer Tibet.
KMT may still be fighting warlords, instead of fighting Indians.
China's population in 1911: 450 million
China's population in 1949: 450 million
No one-child policy implemented between 1911 to 1949, but why China's population has not increased at all?
Let's say Japanese killed 30 million and another 10 million died during the civil war, but this still cannot fill that hole.
And the average lifespan of 37 years and 90% of illiteracy, you can tell how bad this KMT government was actually.