Developereo
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2009
- Messages
- 14,093
- Reaction score
- 25
- Country
- Location
FAIL!
1. What his company brings in, is what his company deposits into 'its' (not 'his') commercial a/c.
From there, the company pays him his salary.
2. a+b = c does not necessarily mean b = 0 and a=c. FAIL AGAIN!
Neither can you prove it, nor can you disprove it. The article doesn't mention it.
It remains your conjecture since you started your slander campaign against the man on this thread.
I have ,fortunately, met better and saner Americans than the waylayers in NYC.
That is your assumption. FAIL AGAIN!
@ Developreo, One simple question for you, my friend.
Does a private company's salary mean its owner's salary? All of it, all of the time?
Think before you answer.
Just putting things in bold and red doesn't improve your arguments.
1- I am going by what's explicitly stated in the OP. You are imagining all sorts of additional factors without any justification. If I did that, you guys would be all over me.
2- The issue of salary v/s corporate earnings was already explained by me in the earlier post. I suggest you re-read it. It's really basic business 101. You can even pick up a Nolo book to refresh your memory, just in case.
Here, I will quote it again:
Here's how a typical private company setup works in America (and most other places).
Company A makes a profit of 1 million dollars.
The owner gives himself a salary of 100,000 dollars. They try to make this amount as small as possible because individual earnings are usually taxes at a much higher rate than corporate profits. However, you can't make it too small or the tax man will pay you a visit.
The remaining 900,000 now belongs to the company and people find creative ways of deriving benefit from it (consult tax accountant for many, many, creative ways.) This is also where non-profit, charitable organizations come into play because everything they spend will reduce the corporation's tax burden. And this is where Mr. B's "Hans Foundation" fits in.
One must ask Pakistanis living in Australia or elsewhere if they are sending money back to Pakistan or not ? By the same logic money earned from Australian source should be spent in Australia ?
I am earning money and at times sending back to my parents and at time doing charity for Indian organization or Royal Flying Doctor Service i.e. to place where I live. A good share of Pakistani economy constitutes money sent by overseas Pakistanis back home. Some Pakistani may be sending money for charity as well; earned from foreign sources ?
Again, no one disputes charity work. The issue is to send 90% of it to India and then claim some sort of moral righteousness about helping America.
When we expats send money back, we also spend the overwhelming chunk of our money locally.