Android
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2011
- Messages
- 4,872
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
no UN recognise it as a disputed territoryFor all intensive purposes GB is already a province of Pakistan, it is integral territory of Pakistan.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no UN recognise it as a disputed territoryFor all intensive purposes GB is already a province of Pakistan, it is integral territory of Pakistan.
For all intensive purposes GB is already a province of Pakistan, it is integral territory of Pakistan.
Thats better it will solve kashmir issue once and for all we dont have not much problem in recognising loc as ibIts pretty ironic that the people of Gilgit Baltistan are also part of "Kashmir" when they are as Kashmiri as a Punjabi or Pakhtun is. Really they have their own languages, own culture, own traditions. I am all for making GB a 5th province.
historically it might have been seperate from kashmir but sadly for you un resolution regard it as a part of kashmir disputeGB was historically a seperate country a kingdom or an emirate ruled by the royal house of Hunza... the people cultural and ethnically arent kashmiri... infact they have more in common with the uighurs than the kashmiris......... also a point to be noted here is tht the people of GB consider themselves Pakistanis and are as patriotic as they get also GB province has the highest literacy rate in all of Pakistan...Also there have been several attempts n protests by the people to be recognized as a part of Pakistan... GoP should make Gilgit-Baltistan a province constitutionally considering it already has a Govnr...
How does absorbing GB in Pakistan, Ladakh and Jammu in India and combining both Pakistani and Indian Administered Kashmir into one as an international territory modelled around what was proposed for Jerusalem in '47 sounds like ?
Done what? Make gb a province and thereby give away your claim on indian kashmir or made entire kashmir international territory?should have done long time ago
On Kashmir : How does absorbing GB in Pakistan, Ladakh and Jammu in India and combining both Pakistani and Indian Administered Kashmir into one as an international territory modelled around what was proposed for Jerusalem in '47 sounds like ?
^ Thanks for the Info.
Personally I don't endorse such plan because I believe it can only create more problems for both countries and the Kashmiris. It sounds somewhat smooth in theory, but it's not going to be easy to implement it.
There should be a better way to end this dispute, in a way it doesn't affect Pakistan.
This jugular vein of ours is too important to let go like this...