Mahathir speaks about Kashmir : UNGA

[manlion]

1) India invaded Kashmir , State of Hyderabad in 1947,

2) India invaded state of Travancore in 1949

3) India invaded a small peaceful country Sikkim in 1975 and Tibet in 1947

4) India invaded Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur. None of these NE states joined Indian Union voluntarily. Most of the people in these state see Indians as invaders

5) India forcefully invaded Goa, Damman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Pondicherry

6) India is forcefully occupying Punjab (Khalistan) and Tamilnadu

7) Tried invading then East Pakistan (Now Bangladesh) , Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Myanmar

 

[manlion]

Indians Call For Exemplary Action Against Malaysia After Its PM Calls India An ‘Invader In Kashmir’

https://swarajyamag.com/insta/india...fter-its-pm-calls-india-an-invader-in-kashmir

https://twitter.com/x/status/1177983947235631104

https://twitter.com/x/status/1178177783308132352

https://twitter.com/x/status/1178177038932299777

 

[Riz]

Alot of honor, respect and salute to malysia and its people from the people of pakistan and kashmir... We love u guys more then anyone's .. And u will found us besides u whenever u need us in future...

 

[Lincoln]

Then at the same time, he says can't confront China on uighur issue.

I wonder, where are we going as Muslims.

 

[Max]

Threatening Malaysia? What would happen to Indian exporters? Think about it. Lol already you lost your $10 billions from illegal Pakistani trade, more and more bharati products via Dubai are being seized by customs here. unemployment is highest in 45 year yet these lowly bhangi keyboard warriors are threatening states with much better living standards and human development.

 

[Max]

I think you refer the name how Arab treats muslims of Indian sub continent?
I am sure you feel that personally and I can understand your condition when they did not allowing their daughters to marry Bhangi's

how your ugly stinky bhangi looking Indian subhuman kind is treated by Arabs is non of Pakistan's concern, dont lump Pakistanis with subcontinent, Pakistanis are among top non Arabs whom Saudi women like to marry and unlike you fart, its based on Arab media reports.

If they would give a single flying fk about your lowly kind, they wouldn't have mentioned Kashmir to begin with..

 

[Beast]

Then at the same time, he says can't confront China on uighur issue.

I wonder, where are we going as Muslims.

Ya.. while you selective pick on uyghur issue while ignore Palestine , Kashmir , Kurdish , Syria and Libya.

We know where u are heading.

 

[Lincoln]

Ya.. while you selective pick on uyghur issue while ignore Palestine , Kashmir , Kurdish , Syria and Libya.

We know where u are heading.

I'm not being selective. I equally oppose oppression of Palestinians. Kurdish people are not oppressed.

I equally oppose American, Russian invasion of Syria. And I equally oppose the interference of Middle East in Yemen and Libya.

I know the parallels I am drawing give you deep pain, keep it up.

 

[Usama Ahmed 86]

The way indians are going, thanks God Vikram lander didnt complete its mission or the indians would have started claiming the moon as well.

 

[Beast]

I'm not being selective. I equally oppose oppression of Palestinians. Kurdish people are not oppressed.

I equally oppose American, Russian invasion of Syria. And I equally oppose the interference of Middle East in Yemen and Libya.

I know the parallels I am drawing give you deep pain, keep it up.

Don't lie. I never see u say anything much about US and EU stance on Kashmir issue. Show me! While you are heavily involved in anything about uyghur on China.

I am following you and I know the kind of agenda u are trying to spread here.

 

[Mujahid Memon]

Arabs and Persians should learn something from Turkey and Malaysia.

 

[BringHarmony]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1177798178680328192

He can speak all he want, but India won this round. They have (regrettably and inhumanly) convinced the entire world that Kashmir is theirs, politically speaking. The question of Kashmir folks becomes non-issue.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

1) India invaded Kashmir , State of Hyderabad in 1947,

2) India invaded state of Travancore in 1949

3) India invaded a small peaceful country Sikkim in 1975 and Tibet in 1947

4) India invaded Nagaland, Mizoram, Manipur. None of these NE states joined Indian Union by free will. Most of the people in these state see Indians as invaders

5) India forcefully invaded Goa, Damman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Pondicherry

6) India is forcefully occupying Punjab (Khalistan) and Tamilnadu

7) Tried invading then East Pakistan (Now Bangladesh) , Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Myanmar

I learned quite a bit from this post, you forgot to mention Juna Garh (Gujrat area) just before Kashmir


However that is the Indian Ultimate Game to not these stories of multiple cases of violation of other people's freedom go main stream. Their main focus is to prevent this full Vision to be public

India is a repeater of violations .....how pathetic is a nation who immediately after gaining independence, starts demolishing Independence of other minority groups. And then they kill their own Leader by Assassination

However, in front of white people, they put the Gandhi guy as a Showpiece but privately they themselves killed their own leader in favor of a violent extremist political strength

They try so hard to start their "STORY" from when they changed the Law , by passing 70 years of Abuse of different people occupied by force

An important part of this "Mission of deceit" is the false map of Kashmir floating around the Web and Internet since 2008 , which shows Kashmir (Indian administered kashmir joined with India)

 

[Lincoln]

Don't lie. I never see u say anything much about US and EU stance on Kashmir issue. Show me! While you are heavily involved in anything about uyghur on China.

I am following you and I know the kind of agenda u are trying to spread here.

Because everyone here opposes the Israeli occupation and the invasion by west in Middle East. I don't need to reiterate it like a retard.

And agenda? **** off. Stupid ****.

 

[manlion]

I learned quite a bit from this post, you forgot to mention Juna Garh (Gujrat area) just before Kashmir


However that is the Indian Ultimate Game to not these stories of multiple cases of violation of other people's freedom go main stream. Their main focus is to prevent this full Vision to be public

India is a repeater of violations .....how pathetic is a nation who immediately after gaining independence, starts demolishing Independence of other minority groups

They try so hard to start their "STORY" from when they changed the Law , by passing 70 years of Abuse of different people occupied by force

An important part of this "Mission of deceit" is the false map of Kashmir floating around the Web and Internet since 2008 , which shows Kashmir (Indian administered kashmir joined with India)

thanks for the input, why list isnt 100 % complete

Five states that refused to join India after Independence
Some of them thought this to be the best moment to acquire independent statehood, while there were others who wanted to become a part of Pakistan. Here are the cases of five princely states that opposed the idea of joining India.

Junagadh

Apart from Hyderabaad, there was one more state that had not acceded to the Indian union by August 15, 1947, the Gujarati state of Junagadh. Junagadh was the most important among the group of Kathiawar states. Here too, the Nawab, Muhammad Mahabat Khanji III ruled over a large Hindu population. However, when on July 25, 1947 Lord Mountbatten addressed the princes, the Dewan of Junagadh had made very clear his decision to advise the Nawab on joining the Indian union

In early 1947, the Dewan of Junagadh, Nabi Baksh invited Sir Shah Nawaz Bhutto of the Muslim league to join the state council of minister. In the absence of the existing dewan, Bhutto took over the office and pressed the Nawab to accede to Pakistan. When Pakistan accepted Junagadh’s request for accession, the Indian leaders were enraged as it went against Jinnah’s two nation theory.

Travancore

The southern Indian maritime state was one of the first princely states to refuse accession to the Indian union and question the Congress’ leadership of the nation. The state was strategically placed for maritime trade and was rich in both human and mineral resources.

Sir C. P. Ramamswamy Aiyar, the dewan of Travancore and a distinguished lawyer by profession, had by 1946 declared his intention of forming an independent state of Travancore that would be open to the idea of signing a treaty with the Indian union. Historian Ramachandra Guha notes that Travancore’s bid to independence was in fact propelled by Mohammed Ali Jinnah. Sir C.P. Aiyar is also said to have had secret ties with the UK government who were in support of an independent Travancore in the hope that they would get exclusive access to a mineral called monazite that the area was rich in, and would give an edge to Britain in the nuclear arms race. While the Dewan stuck to his position till as late as July 1947, he changed his mind soon after he survived an assassination attempt by a member of the Kerala Socialist Party. On July 30 1947, Travancore joined India.

Bhopal

Another state that wished to declare independence was Bhopal, which had a Muslim Nawab, Hamidullah Khan, ruling over a majority Hindu population. A close friend of the Muslim League, the Nawab was staunchly opposed to Congress rule. He had made clear his decision to attain independence to Mountbatten. However, the latter wrote back to him stating that “no ruler could run away from the dominion closest to him”. By July 1947, the prince became aware of the large number of princes who had acceded to India and decided to follow suit.

Hyderabad

Jodhpur

The Rajput princely state of Jodhpur was a strange case of tilting towards Pakistan despite having a Hindu king and a large Hindu population. While the prince, Maharaja Hanvant Singh, was strong in his willingness to join India, he somehow got the idea that it might be more beneficial for him to join Pakistan on account of the fact that his state shared border with the soon to be born country.

Further, he was lured into joining Pakistan by Jinnah who offered him full port facilities in Karachi along with military and agrarian support. However, when Vallabhbhai Patel was made aware of the possibility of Jodhpur going to Pakistan, he immediately contacted the prince and offered him sufficient benefits and explained to him the problems of joining a Muslim state. Eventually the Jodhpur prince was won back. Historian Ramchandra Guha, in his work “India after Gandhi”, notes that on being presented with the Instrument of Accession, the Jodhpur prince dramatically took out a revolver and held it on the secretary’s head saying, “I will not accept your dictation”. However, few minutes later he calmed down and signed the document.

https://indianexpress.com/article/r...hat-refused-to-join-india-after-independence/