What's new

Maersk CEO Reveals ‘Ironic’ Twist in U.S. Trade War With China

Going by the flurry of articles, it's obvious the US-China trade war has benefitted the Chinese in a big way. Makes you wonder, why doesn't China up the ante and force the US to further increase the tariffs. :what:

I think because they understand Trump , deeply, Trump simply does not want to be wrong, all the time, and the Chinese know that, so they create an illusion of defeat and weak while their economy may already bigger then US in term of normal GDP if they calculate their shadow economy. In fact, they even directed all their newspapers not to criticize Trump.
The Russian also know this, and they all criticize Trump's aides
China will eventually declare defeat and Trump to declare victory.
Basic Sun Tzu, weak appear strong, strong appear weak.
 
.
The article was quoting the Maersk Ceo's opinion.

I standby what i said- you should replace him.

Read the article please, this is THE LEAST you can do.

At no time in the article the CEO of Maersk CEO claim US is losing the trade war or even trade war is bad for the US.

The full article is here

The man running the world’s largest container-shipping company says he
has access to data that shows Donald Trump has so far failed to wean the U.S. off Chinese imports.

Soren Skou, the chief executive of A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S, says Chinese exports to the U.S. actually grew 5-10 percent last quarter. Meanwhile, U.S. exports to China fell by 25-30 percent.

“It’s an ironic development,” Skou told reporters in Copenhagen on Wednesday. “But after Trump has turned up the volume, the U.S. has only increased their imports from China even more.”

There are two reasons behind the development, Skou said.

Firstly, the U.S. economy is doing well so consumers there have more money to spend on imports, he said. Secondly, a lot of the really big U.S. companies are hoarding Chinese imports to buy as much as possible before tariffs kick in, he said.

“When we talk to our customers, we hear from many of them that they want to bring in a lot of goods before the end of the year,” Skou said.

Maersk transports about a fifth of the world’s seaborne manufactured goods, so the company is in a unique position to gauge changes in global trade flows. Given Maersk’s reliance on free trade, Skou hasn’t shied away from criticizing Trump’s tariffs in the past.

Read more: Tariffs Will Hurt U.S. Much More Than Rest of World, Maersk Says

Part of the problem is that Trump is fighting an “asymmetric” battle, because China has a lot more clout than the U.S. when it comes to telling corporations how to act, Skou said.

“Donald Trump can’t tell Nike, Walmart and The Home Depot that they can’t import from China,” he said. “So they will continue to import and will work on solutions and they may be hit a bit on their margins.”

“Meanwhile, the Chinese state-controlled companies don’t need many signals from Beijing to lower their imports from the U.S.,” Skou said.

Read more: Maersk Raises Lower End of Forecast Range as Sales Pick Up

The Maersk CEO also warned that China is having an easier time finding substitutes for U.S. products than the U.S. is in replacing Chinese imports.

“The large U.S. importers aren’t considering building new factories in the U.S.,” he said. “What they are considering is whether they can buy in Vietnam, Bangladesh or India.”


According to Skou, that should leave Trump with little choice but to strike a deal with China, which he says may come “within the next quarters.”

But even if there’s a trade deal between China and the U.S., Skou says Maersk will prepare for lower trans-pacific trade next year.

“There will be a price to pay for container lines in 2019,” he said. “What we plan for now, is that we have to take out a lot of capacity on trans-Pacific trade next year. There will be a high level of inventory build-up which needs to be brought down again and that will affect volumes.”
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Maersk CEO said is, the trade volume spike because of two reason.

1.) US importer is hoarding Chinese import BEFORE the tariff kicks in
2.) US, unlike China, have less control to local business to NOT to import from China.

He also said even with trade deal and compromise, he is expecting to have a lower trans-pacific trade next year.

The article was written by Christian Weinberg, not Maersk CEO, and Maersk CEO only give a stone cold fact out, and mr Weinberg come up with this article.
 
.
Read the article please, this is THE LEAST you can do.

At no time in the article the CEO of Maersk CEO claim US is losing the trade war or even trade war is bad for the US.

The full article is here

The man running the world’s largest container-shipping company says he
has access to data that shows Donald Trump has so far failed to wean the U.S. off Chinese imports.

Soren Skou, the chief executive of A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S, says Chinese exports to the U.S. actually grew 5-10 percent last quarter. Meanwhile, U.S. exports to China fell by 25-30 percent.

“It’s an ironic development,” Skou told reporters in Copenhagen on Wednesday. “But after Trump has turned up the volume, the U.S. has only increased their imports from China even more.”

There are two reasons behind the development, Skou said.

Firstly, the U.S. economy is doing well so consumers there have more money to spend on imports, he said. Secondly, a lot of the really big U.S. companies are hoarding Chinese imports to buy as much as possible before tariffs kick in, he said.

“When we talk to our customers, we hear from many of them that they want to bring in a lot of goods before the end of the year,” Skou said.

Maersk transports about a fifth of the world’s seaborne manufactured goods, so the company is in a unique position to gauge changes in global trade flows. Given Maersk’s reliance on free trade, Skou hasn’t shied away from criticizing Trump’s tariffs in the past.

Read more: Tariffs Will Hurt U.S. Much More Than Rest of World, Maersk Says

Part of the problem is that Trump is fighting an “asymmetric” battle, because China has a lot more clout than the U.S. when it comes to telling corporations how to act, Skou said.

“Donald Trump can’t tell Nike, Walmart and The Home Depot that they can’t import from China,” he said. “So they will continue to import and will work on solutions and they may be hit a bit on their margins.”

“Meanwhile, the Chinese state-controlled companies don’t need many signals from Beijing to lower their imports from the U.S.,” Skou said.

Read more: Maersk Raises Lower End of Forecast Range as Sales Pick Up

The Maersk CEO also warned that China is having an easier time finding substitutes for U.S. products than the U.S. is in replacing Chinese imports.

“The large U.S. importers aren’t considering building new factories in the U.S.,” he said. “What they are considering is whether they can buy in Vietnam, Bangladesh or India.”


According to Skou, that should leave Trump with little choice but to strike a deal with China, which he says may come “within the next quarters.”

But even if there’s a trade deal between China and the U.S., Skou says Maersk will prepare for lower trans-pacific trade next year.

“There will be a price to pay for container lines in 2019,” he said. “What we plan for now, is that we have to take out a lot of capacity on trans-Pacific trade next year. There will be a high level of inventory build-up which needs to be brought down again and that will affect volumes.”
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Maersk CEO said is, the trade volume spike because of two reason.

1.) US importer is hoarding Chinese import BEFORE the tariff kicks in
2.) US, unlike China, have less control to local business to NOT to import from China.

He also said even with trade deal and compromise, he is expecting to have a lower trans-pacific trade next year.

The article was written by Christian Weinberg, not Maersk CEO, and Maersk CEO only give a stone cold fact out, and mr Weinberg come up with this article.
= Doesnt changes anything; the article was merely quoting what the Maesrk CEO said. U claimed the article was stupid.

Henceforth, u should replace him.
 
.
= Doesnt changes anything; the article was merely quoting what the Maesrk CEO said. U claimed the article was stupid.

Henceforth, u should replace him.

Again, was the article "Quoting" Mr Skou?

If it does, then the article should be titled "Maersk CEO release trade volume In 2018" Which is what Skou did, the fact that the article talk about "How this is damage to US or how US loses trade war" have not even mentioned by Skou's mouth at all.

Again, tell me where did Mr Skou said US is going to lose a trade war or Trade war is hurting the US more than the Chinese? When he himself said he is expecting LOW VOLUME of trade even with some deal between China and US?

LOL, if the author is actually "Quoting" Mr Skou, he is doing a very bad job anyway, hence the article is stupid anyway as he can't even quote right.
 
.
Again, was the article "Quoting" Mr Skou?

If it does, then the article should be titled "Maersk CEO release trade volume In 2018" Which is what Skou did, the fact that the article talk about "How this is damage to US or how US loses trade war" have not even mentioned by Skou's mouth at all.

Again, tell me where did Mr Skou said US is going to lose a trade war or Trade war is hurting the US more than the Chinese? When he himself said he is expecting LOW VOLUME of trade even with some deal between China and US?

LOL, if the author is actually "Quoting" Mr Skou, he is doing a very bad job anyway, hence the article is stupid anyway as he can't even quote right.
U said the article was stupid.
The article was quoting Mr Skou's words.

Thus, you should replace Mr Skou.

Hope Maersk will prosper under you, unlike your stupid predecessor.
 
.
U said the article was stupid.
The article was quoting Mr Skou's words.

Thus, you should replace Mr Skou.

Hope Maersk will prosper under you, unlike your stupid predecessor.

Again, do tell me where in the article Skou said "US is going to lose the trade war" or "Trade war is hurting the US"

And you should go back to school and learn to read and think.
 
.
Again, do tell me where in the article Skou said "US is going to lose the trade war" or "Trade war is hurting the US"

And you should go back to school and learn to read and think.
= longwinded Strawman.

You said the article was stupid.
The article was quoting Mr Skou's words.

Thus, you should replace Maersk's stupid CEO.
 
.
= longwinded Strawman.

You said the article was stupid.
The article was quoting Mr Skou's words.

Thus, you should replace Maersk's stupid CEO.
Again, do tell me where in the article Skou actually said "US is going to lose the trade war" or "Trade war is hurting the US"
 
.
= Strawman.

You said the article was stupid.
The article was quoting Mr Skou's words.

Thus, you should replace Maersk's stupid CEO.
Again, do tell me where in the article Skou actually said "US is going to lose the trade war" or "Trade war is hurting the US"
 
.
= Strawman.

You said the article was stupid.
The article was quoting Mr Skou's words.

Thus, you should replace Maersk's stupid CEO.

Again, do tell me where in the article Skou actually said "US is going to lose the trade war" or "Trade war is hurting the US"

You keep saying this article is what Maersk CEO said but I still can't find where Mr Skou said US will be defeated in the Trade War and Trade war is hurting the US more than China.

So where is that? Or is it in your imagination? Wannabe? LOL
 
.
Again, do tell me where in the article Skou actually said "US is going to lose the trade war" or "Trade war is hurting the US"

You keep saying this article is what Maersk CEO said but I still can't find where Mr Skou said US will be defeated in the Trade War and Trade war is hurting the US more than China.

So where is that? Or is it in your imagination? Wannabe? LOL
= Strawman and red herring.

You said the article was stupid in your very first post here.

The article was merely quoting Mr Skou's opinion.

Henceforth, you should replace Mr Skou as Maesrk's CEO.

Thanks.
 
.
= Strawman and red herring.

You said the article was stupid in your very first post here.

The article was merely quoting Mr Skou's opinion.

Henceforth, you should replace Mr Skou as Maesrk's CEO.

Thanks.

again, if this article is quoting Mr Skou, then he must have said "US is going to lose the Trade War" or "Trade War is hurting US more than China" somewhere? Because this is what this article is about.

And I don't see it anywhere, hence this article is stupid.
 
.
again, if this article is quoting Mr Skou, then he must have said "US is going to lose the Trade War" or "Trade War is hurting US more than China" somewhere? Because this is what this article is about.

And I don't see it anywhere, hence this article is stupid.

Bla bla bla bla bla bla.

You said the article was stupid, when it was merely quoting Mr Skou's words. Henceforth, his words were stupid.

A stupid CEO is disastrous for a giant shipping company.

Thus, you should replace him as Maersk's CEO for highlighting his stupidity.

Im expecting to see Maersk's shares skyrocket after your appointment.

Please do not let me down.

Thanks.
 
.
Bla bla bla bla bla bla.

You said the article was stupid, when it was merely quoting Mr Skou's words. Henceforth, his words were stupid.

A stupid CEO is disatrous for a giant shipping company.

Thus, you should replace him as Maersk's Ceo for highlighting his stupidity.

Im expecting to see Maersk's shares skyrocket after your appointment.

Please do not let me down.

Thanks.

I never said the CEO is stupid, the author of this article is stupid, and this article is stupid.

again, if this article is quoting Mr Skou, then he must have said "US is going to lose the Trade War" or "Trade War is hurting US more than China" somewhere? Because this is what this article is about.

And I don't see it anywhere, hence this article is stupid.

And I can do this all day. I don't have work til Saturday, you want to keep word playing with me?
 
.
I never said the CEO is stupid, the author of this article is stupid, and this article is stupid.

again, if this article is quoting Mr Skou, then he must have said "US is going to lose the Trade War" or "Trade War is hurting US more than China" somewhere? Because this is what this article is about.

And I don't see it anywhere, hence this article is stupid.
= Strawman + no true scotsman

You said the article was stupid, when it was merely reporting what the CEO said.

Are you now insinuating that the bloomberg reporter was falsifying Mr Skou's words?
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom