Her parents filed a hebious corpus. Which means, even if she is not interested she should appear before court.
Hebious corpus does not give the right to the court to take the person under it's guardianship and usurp the person's personal life decisions.
Court only has to make sure that she was not forcefully converted. And no forceful conversion had been proved in this case.
One last time, the court is should be informed about the marriage. It's not asking for permission. All here actions influence the court. If she marries one day and divorce another day, what should the court do. Change the decisions as such.
Court has nothing to say in the matter if she marries one day and take divorce the next day. It is entirely her own decision.
Stop reading sources and read the judgement copy. I can't dig it our, its rather late and I'm bored.
I am afraid that it was you who made the claim. Thus the responsibility of providing the evidence also lies upon you.
Court didn't take her right away, court took a decision and dissolved the marriage which the court don't deem to be valid under the law. There was no documents provided for the marriage.
This is the issue. Court didn't present any valid reason for the annulment. Only reason presented by the court was this that the 24 years old Girl is not mature to take this decision without her parents. It was a very ridiculous proof that has been presented by the court.
And you say no documents provided for the marriage. And I say if a girl says in the court in person she marries that boy, then it is in itself a marriage and no other proof is required.
If that was anything against law then Supreme court should've withheld the decision. But it didn't.
That's the issue here.
Even Supreme Court has not provided the justice and didn't asked her directly to witness in the court and see if she is sound and mature or not. But the supreme court linked her case to the Terrorism, thus delaying and denying her the justice.
So what is in India's interest.
Running conversion factory for muslims? Woah.
You are accepting a defeat that you could not compete the Muslims in Preaching. Thus you want to use any non legal and criminal way of stopping as you deem possible, and thus targeting the whole Muslim community (even the innocent ones) by giving life to the Love Jihad conspiracy.
Instead of this, much better way would be to reform yourself.
First of all educate the girls. Also abolish the caste system which is mainly used by the Muslim preachers as an argument.
Also don't cut the ties with the girls if they decide to convert and marry. But help them to stay in contact and help them if they decide to come back and leave Islam.
There is no other alternative to it.
I'm glad the court decide to pass an investigation into the case. And throw off the wedding. Let the girl is given enough time and counseling before she goes with that guy again. And let the NIA investigate on that guy. I don't want that girl to be with that guy until the investigation is over.
Please understand, it is not your right to decide on her behalf. This decision only belongs to her. If you, or even the court try to usurp this right of her's, then you are acting against the law.
It is the worst decision by the high courts of India which have no precedence up till now. Afterwards, all the cases of Hindu girls marriage with Muslims will be termed as Love Jihad and thousands of problems will be created for the love birds.
Why do you or the courts want to involve themselves in the private life of the people?