What's new

love jihad in india - reality exposed by operation juliet

In the current environment Love Jihad, Reverse Love Jihad and Inter caste marriages should be totally avoided.

there is no "love jihad", like the article proves and the_showstopper also said this yesterday... what there is in existence is consensual romance between muslim men and hindu ladies which is unbearable to the sangh, hence the sangh creating a pan-india conspiracy to separate the couples.

and in the current environment, inter-sect/inter-religion marriages should be encouraged to dilute the poisonous atmosphere.

So does that mean i got no chance with Alia Bhat :(

i suppose you can count on her father having a muslim mother... plus there is the kashmiri thing.

There word "Love Jihad" is/was a reality........ It was a covert operation...... and it is been opposed covertly......

do you have proof that "love jihad" exists??

1271297977476.jpg

My sentiments exactly with copy paste walls of text.

Agar OP sankshipt mein baat batain to theek rahega.

the first section called "introduction before the main article" is my writing, and you can skip to the vids at the end... the cobrapost/gulail writing is mainly transcription of the vids.

Happy regressive superstitious Hindu terroristish Diwali.

to you too. :tup:
 
.
there is no "love jihad", like the article proves and the_showstopper also said this yesterday... what there is in existence is consensual romance between muslim men and hindu ladies which is unbearable to the sangh, hence the sangh creating a pan-india conspiracy to separate the couples.

and in the current environment, inter-sect/inter-religion marriages should be encouraged to dilute the poisonous atmosphere.



i suppose you can count on her father having a muslim mother... plus there is the kashmiri thing.



do you have proof that "love jihad" exists??





the first section called "introduction before the main article" is my writing, and you can skip to the vids at the end... the cobrapost/gulail writing is mainly transcription of the vids.



to you too. :tup:
Someone told me she is gujrati
 
. .
@jamahir

I am on principle opposed to the union of two people in matrimony where one is subjugated to the faith of the other, either voluntarily or because of the dearth of a workable alternative.

It is deeply insulting to me personally. Even where neither I nor my own are involved.

Cheers, Doc
 
.
@jamahir

I am on principle opposed to the union of two people in matrimony where one is subjugated to the faith of the other, either voluntarily or because of the dearth of a workable alternative.

It is deeply insulting to me personally. Even where neither I nor my own are involved.

Cheers, Doc

i don't understand how subjugation came into this... do you think sunil dutt was subjugated to the faith/practices of nargis??

and in other threads i have been talking about "uniform civil code" where secular law will ensure lot of things, including not allowing riots or conspiracies just because a marrying couple belong to different religions.
 
. . .
I think I have made my point adequately lucidly for those of even compromised intellect to comprehend.

sorry but you did not. :)

you brought in a new thing about subjugation.

@jamahir I can not show you any proof - but when a true secular mallu say something like that, you shud believe it.. and and I know what I am talking

look, there may be a few modern muslim young men who take prayers and ritualism a bit too seriously and may want to impress upon their hindu girlfriends that muslim ways are superior but i assure you there is no elaborate conspiracy called "love jihad"... if there was, i would know.
 
. .
I agree that the issue has been magnified by right wingers.... but on cannot deny it entirely....I know certain things, and don't wish to wash dirty laundry on a forum like this....


look, there may be a few modern muslim young men who take prayers and ritualism a bit too seriously and may want to impress upon their hindu girlfriends that muslim ways are superior but i assure you there is no elaborate conspiracy called "love jihad"... if there was, i would know.
 
. .
Someone told me she is gujrati
She is of Gujju Kashmiri descent. His father Mahesh Bhatt is a Muslim(convert). Not her mother. For some reason, she remains Hindu.

look, there may be a few modern muslim young men who take prayers and ritualism a bit too seriously and may want to impress upon their hindu girlfriends that muslim ways are superior but i assure you there is no elaborate conspiracy called "love jihad"... if there was, i would know.
Look. You and Showstopper saying it does not exist is like Amon Goeth saying there was no Sobibor.

It exists. Has always existed. And will continue to exist until people take religion less and women more seriously. Call it by any name you want but the end result is the same. Marriage by deception, followed by conversion. Then the girl either flees, is shamed and lives on, kills herself. Seen scores of such incident myself - personally. And I have not seen that with ANY OTHER community.

So yes, Muslim community leaders are responsible, Muslim society is responsible and Muslim men who take deceive other girls into marriage by faking names are frauds and touts. Worse, they consider women as trophies of conquests. Your whitewashing of yet another abominable crime is not working. Showstopper defends them much better. He uses some logic. You never do.
 
.
Thing is that regardless of our political persuasions, most Hindus unanimously believe that Hindu women should not marry into Muslim households. This is rational thinking.
I think that is true for Christians too.

@jamahir

I am on principle opposed to the union of two people in matrimony where one is subjugated to the faith of the other, either voluntarily or because of the dearth of a workable alternative.

It is deeply insulting to me personally. Even where neither I nor my own are involved.

Cheers, Doc
Exactly Doc you have a way of distilling into one pithy sentence. :tup:
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom