Because US is afraid of dying Taliban are not USA is afraid of many things in the world but Taliban are not their is hell of different when dying is not a problem for someone its a big problem for its enemies and when even getting hurt with minor wounds becomes problem that taking on that nation is a very easy job
That is quite an assumption.
Whereas bravery is not in the domain of any particular nation, in war there are victors and losers though both sides may have brave soldiers.
I think USA is afraid of losing its foot soldiers whereas the Taliban do not care for their foot soldiers. No leader or general is worth his salt if he deliberately puts his troops in harms way and yet tries his best to save his own skin only.
Dying is not a problem for Taliban but then why do all their leaders run and save their lives each and every time?
Why were thousands of clueless pawns left as cannon fodder for the invading forces?
Why was a multitude of teenagers and youngsters urged on by the likes of Sufi Muhammad to crossover the Durand line and help Taliban when Sufi Muhammad himself came back with his tail between his legs and accompanied by few of his sons and close advisers?
Did Fazlullah in Swat fight or flee after butchering innocents and urging his followers to fight?
For a Holy warrior (as they claim themselves to be) this is a disgrace!
I would say that when there is poverty and frustration due to both internal and external policies and there are a lot of youth who are not sure of a secure future...such circumstances are bound to give birth to risk takers who can be easily recruited with promises of glory.
Sad to see that the messengers rarely risk their own neck but send hundreds and thousands to their deaths.
So should we be proud of the desperate youth who are easily misled into suicide bombings and suicide attacks which kill innocent bystanders more than the proclaimed enemy?
Should we not think that this is perhaps a very desperate situation and the Afghan Taliban should avoid getting the innocent Afghan people killed whether pro or anti Taliban?
Why is it so easy to condemn an innocent to his death as an acceptable collateral if he trying to earn his livelihood by working in an area where the enemies of Taliban are present?
Sadly this has happened so many times.
Do you all think that it is easy to see one's family sink deeper and deeper into poverty and desperation?
When the Taliban initially came into being they promised unity, order and welfare.
They were supported by the locals and then they betrayed the trust by passing out orders that were insane to be mildly put.
When the Taliban stopped Afghan women from working it was like passing a death sentence for thousands of families which had lost their men to the wars!
Yet there are many who would still see their actions as Islamic, their was nothing Islamic about it...it was a most ignorant and barbaric order which condemned people to misery and there is nothing more hateful to Allah than a ruler who deliberately makes his wards miserable.
We saw the same in Swat whereby huge signs were posted outside the largest clothes market for women warning women not to enter the market...and we saw a shopkeeper in the same market praising the Taliban; it was ironic and plainly obvious that he was saying this only for fear of his life, otherwise no shopkeeper would praise someone who ensures that his business is doomed and he is left destitute.
These are not the Holy warriors we read about in our books...they were leaders who were first in line when the going was the toughest.
Uqba bin Nafe (RA) was a famous general who conquered all of Africa and then gave leave to most of his troops till only 300-400 Arabs were left and rest were all African newly converted Muslims.
One of the Chiefs of the African Berber Muslims was bearing a grudge against Uqba and was urging on the Africans to get rid of him.
Despite the advice of his troops, Uqba did not retain his thousands of veteran troops except the 300-400 soldiers.
When the Berber Chief rallied thousands and attacked Uqba, he stayed on and fought till he was martyred with his Army standard flying high.
I can give countless examples to prove the point.
After all these militant movements cite the likes of the great Khalid bin Waleed (RA), Saad bin Abi Waqqas (RA) etc. as an inspiration to their Holy Warrior image.
These men were great generals but always risked their own neck in the most dangerous phases of their campaigns.
At present i only see the youth who are being sacrificed on the alter of holiness while their great and brave commanders play hide and seek to live and fight another day.
I have no problem in living and fighting another day as a strategy, but when it only applies to a few hundred leaders and life of the foot soldier is considered dispensable...then they are not Holy Warriors at all.
If they are fighting a guerrilla war then they should save the lives of their men and the locals as well but it is not just survival, they want to retain their brand image and so send their people out to die deliberately and know very well that innocents will also be killed in crossfire.
So are the Taliban still rescuing the people?
Are the Taliban from A to Z not at all afraid of dying?
I am not convinced of this by virtue of their tactics and their ideology.
Certainly i do not welcome US presence in Afghanistan nor the manner in which they went about after 9/11, however the Taliban are not doing any favor to Afghans and have become avengers not rescuers.