The police said they "believe the suspect is wearing an explosive vest". If that's the case, How did they know?
Then,
Why did the police shoot the suspect at close range knowing that the suspect is wearing the explosive vest, Knowing that, the police on shooting they could have triggered of the explosive creating catastrophic damage and lives when the traffic on the opposite side was at standstill with drivers and passengers in their vehicles. Also, did the police not think of their safety or that of their fellow officers at close range. On shooting the victim, they were quick to say the explosive vest was a hoax. It didn't take long to say that, so, did they know in the first place it was a hoax? Whether it was a hoax or not should the police not disable the suspect by shooting at legs or arms rather than shooting in the abdomen where the vest is.