Bang Galore
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2010
- Messages
- 10,685
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
I'm not sure I've understood. Here's the media saying it was a bad example of Make in India gone berserk. Here's the media-watcher promptly announcing that the media have been bought. Why bought? Why not just derisive of the juxtaposition of the decision to procure more Tejas with the announcement of the Make in India initiative?
I was commenting on two references made in different posts of yours where you first made the point that the government was not involved but then went on make a comment about "56" which kind of suggested that those giving credit should not be doing so to Mr.Modi but anyone critiquing him on the very same issue was quite okay & no motive should be attributed there. I'm aware of your dislike for the government & the PM but that seemed more than a bit unfair.
And the explanation of this slew of hostile articles, from very different sources, is that there was a pay-master? Perhaps, could it have been the BJP itself, trying to claim credit and watching in horror as it backfired with precision and lasting damage?
Perhaps, and I'm sure there will be those who will make that argument. Only fair that a similar leeway be applied to comments coming in the opposite direction. Though if you look at these stories from the supposedly different sources, the only argument to make (since you have already demolished the substance of their claim) is to suggest they all caught a very nasty virus at the very same time which caused this mass outbreak of incompetence. Would you then not be interested in the source of the outbreak?