What's new

LCA a product of western companies, engineers, and consultants.

I've said it a few times..that India should of bought the rights to produce the Mirage 2000-5

1090.jpg
IAF loves it mirage2000's and france was ready to give full tooling and manufacturing line to india in 2005 and most work was already done but then came UPA government that rejected the offer and wanted to buy rafales instead rest is history
 
.
IAF loves it mirage2000's and france was ready to give full tooling and manufacturing line to india in 2005 and most work was already done but then came UPA government that rejected the offer and wanted to buy rafales instead rest is history


that sucks. Mirage is one of my favorite fighters. could of gone with Mirage and Rafale as a package :cry:
 
. .
Why should I or why should India. Reason

1. what is the number of fighter plane sale.
2. How many pakistani build amunition are going to be sold -- NIL all Chinese
3. How much profit does pakistan will earn with this sale.
4. Does the F14 of the IRAN means anything to US else Pakistan have developed some alien technology, which have its own mind to think against India.

So I congratulate China, and I am highly impressed with the chinese, that they pick up the abandoned project of the soviet Mig 1.44 a single seater mig-29 variant project, make venture with Pakistan to invest half of the money in the development and inheritably gets its first customer with 150 FC-1 which was designated as JF-17 to the PAF.
Chinese are good businessman, they not only took/will take some share in the international market with this bird, but they are agressively marketing their weaponary like CMXX, PL-10A, WMD-7 and will give good profit to all those firms manufacturing these weapons.
A one short note whatever
A successful flying fighter jets, win confidence of one of the best air force in world PAF and many others. get a life kid
 
.
The thing is, so many countries from 4 different continents have been developing LCA for India that its so hard to keep track of who helped with what. Read about detailed article on ALH foreigner involvement and you will be surprised to know India has no contribution in Dhruv or ALH development. LCA has same story, France, Germany, USA, Israel, even Russia developed LCA avionics, FBW, self protection radar engines, hydraulics and heck even the wheels and yes, France yet again was called in to develop "undercarriage" for Naval LCA.

Be specific, and instead of copy pasting your rants from the Haq Musing, stich to LCA only.

1. Do you know what is EW Suite
2. Why should I read ALH when the thread is LCA related -- offtopic
3. Post point wise all avionics list and from which country, instead of opening your mouth like Buffalow and chanting AYOOOOOO................



3 decades and counting... enough said :lol:

Is it so much difficult for the dumbest person in the world to understand that for a fighter plane to be developed with no much prior knowledge and resources in the country with the parallel turbo fan Engine and setting up more than 100 institutions and whole ecosystem easily takes 30+ years with the budget of mere 2 + 1.2 Billion dollor,

To be precise only U.S, Russia, and Europe care capable of producing 4th generation fighter plane completely indigenous.

Most important this question was not for you.

Dasault initially offered India full access to MK2 technology for LCA but india chose multiple companies from 4 different continents. Btw he did put Rafale and failed LCA in same category.

Is it difficult for the most dumbest perston in the world to understand that the Dassault was the OEM who reviewed the technical project defination of the LCA design of the ADA, and if you don't understand this meaning ask your seniors and quote me. No OEM like Dassault, SAAB, LM offered his services for free, and not only Dassault, SAAB, and Sukhoi offered to join MK-2 project, even Singapore offered to join LCA during its intial days with 50% partnership, which was turned down.

For MK-2 here is the update for you
1. Engine F-414INS with Avin TVC --- US to remove the AoA
2. 1 Mt Longer length for space for avionics
3. Internal jammer Virgilus, Aesa MMR (Elta EL/M-2052, Uttam)
4. Better Sensors and avionics
5. Frameless HUD, Upgraded Glass cockpit.
6. Lighter wt, compostite up to 70%.


For you only few things

1. Don't quote me

2 Don't quote me

3 Most important Don't quote me

A one short note whatever
A successful flying fighter jets, win confidence of one of the best air force in world PAF and many others. get a life kid

Thats why I am congratulating the Chinese CAC and its ally PAC and all the related OEM supplying Weapons and congratullating Russian Kimilov for this.

I have long congratullate PAF for JF-17 for getting a single soulution for the Mirrage 3/5, Nachang Q-5, and J-7 replacement, with the weapon package, which is impressive and that too with the chinese payment options.
 
.
if west pulls out India will fall and turn into ethopia.
And pakistan is la la land ....
The thing is, so many countries from 4 different continents have been developing LCA for India that its so hard to keep track of who helped with what. Read about detailed article on ALH foreigner involvement and you will be surprised to know India has no contribution in Dhruv or ALH development. LCA has same story, France, Germany, USA, Israel, even Russia developed LCA avionics, FBW, self protection radar engines, hydraulics and heck even the wheels and yes, France yet again was called in to develop "undercarriage" for Naval LCA.
HEY you didn't answer my question ...Is LCH and LUH is also foreign designed?

LCA avionics, FBW, self protection hydraulics are made DRDO.......its a fact...ranting not gonna help

Radar and engine is foreign ............France is consulted due to their experience in naval platform .....because like ostrich who keep head into soil just like you .....don't know that Naval LCA is already flying

I understand the pain of non achievement ,,,,and yes don't talk about sucess of j-17 a chinese built fighter ......where CAC should be given credit for that

As Mig-33 is to JF-17

Piranha is to LCA Tejas

Piranha was a light fighter jet concept by Dr George Bridel who also contributed in development of LCA.

Piranha without canards is pretty much LCA. lol

Piranha_Modell_1.jpg


Piranha1.jpg
Please check a eye specialist ..............going by your logic who out canard gripen typoon J-10 will also become LCA then rather a simple cranked angle delta wing
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom