What's new

LCA a product of western companies, engineers, and consultants.

.
numbnuts thats why i said, Westerns are back thats why LCA project is still alive...

And why do you have a pic of a gora sitting on a chinese tank? He could be the same guy who just designed Indian tank jet or submarine and having just a little chit chat with chinese about how dumbf19c indians are.

You needed some Serbian guy to help your hand well after it was designed. :rofl: Please save it.


And yes, yes, USA willingly totally helped India with it's space and ballistic missile program - Any idiot will tell you there's no way in hell such a thing would intentionally pass. India was denied actuators for Rustom 2 program, let alone helping in space and defence tech. :rofl:

Enjoy

care.jpg

45321900.cms

10842028_1580759245480765_1070034987562358220_o-1.jpg

gslv-mkiii.jpg

index.php

mk3_2.jpg

care.jpg__800x600_q85_crop.jpg

Coast-Guard.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Jf 17 is a copied design Chinese copied the design from an american fighter jet designs.
Kid, the goras made LCA from scratch! Atleast China has more input in JF-17 then India has on LCA.... And JF-17 is in service while LCA is getting piggy back on tata truck.
 
. .
you mean LCA is in stage of 3rd decade and 1 more decade to go? lol
Exactly sir, 1 decade 2 decade hell even another 100 years doesn't matter, we have enough money to buy weapons, when we need it. Btw, instead of thinking so much good about us, shouldn't you be thinking about getting proper electricity?
 
. .
There, there.. Your episodes are really funny, remember the time you said LCH was a Russian model, before it was even shown.

Kazan+Ansat+is+a+Russian+light%252C+multipurpose+helicopter+manufactured+by+Kazan+Helicopters.+gunship+attack+export++%25285%2529.jpg


Russian


Sir, it still looks nothing like that. :(

JRSoZV6.jpg

qAXH0Zx.jpg


sad_hug___updated_by_mirz123-d2byd6u.gif
मूर्ख अपनी मूर्खता का उदहारण निरंतर देता रहता है ...

अकल्मन्द उसे शांति से देने देता है !
(the idiot continuously gives example of its idiocracy .. the smart and learned silently allows him to do so)
- Chanakya
 
.
मूर्ख अपनी मूर्खता का उदहारण निरंतर देता रहता है ...

अकल्मन्द उसे शांति से देने देता है !
(the idiot continuously gives example of its idiocracy .. the smart and learned silently allows him to do so)
- Chanakya
He believes only western countries are capable bunch. He must have inferiority complex living in USA.
 
.
मूर्ख अपनी मूर्खता का उदहारण निरंतर देता रहता है ...

अकल्मन्द उसे शांति से देने देता है !
(the idiot continuously gives example of its idiocracy .. the smart and learned silently allows him to do so)
- Chanakya
Very well said and it actually suits on OP too.
 
.
Much of the work was already done by European long before nuclear detonation. All was left to do for India was a paint job which took them couple of years to "indigenously" paint LCA... Since India is unable to get this thing in air, the western companies consultants and engineers are back to get it in air...

Haha Your Belly Burn is well understandable. Now let me know when was the first prototype tested, who tested it and where it was tested. Answering these questions will get you near the answer.

I do not say we did no use consultants, of course we did and so do many other aircraft manufacturers. But calling it a western aircraft is not very appropriate for a fighter for which India holds complete rights. Do you have any Idea on the amount of Indian components and research that has gone into the aircraft. The design of LCA today is very much different than what the prototype was.
 
.
bottomline- lca is very very indiginaas,,,soon it will become a worrld claas fighter wid indiginaas screwdriver
also jf 17 is inferior n a copy
 
.
Have you realized JF-17 is in active service while


With what? No double seated trainer or half the subsystems that makes a plane a 4th gen fighter LOLOLOLOL.
Face it, JF-17 is a haphazard plane inducted in a lackadaisical fashion, until then keep dreaming about Block 3.

During sanctions that is the 90s, Americans withheld all the data from the Tejas designers.
So your point is moot.
Rest of it is just butthurt since Tejas will be outperforming your JF-17 in the Bahrain airshow.
 
Last edited:
.
@Oscar @Irfan Baloch @WAJsal @HRK @waz @Icarus @Slav Defence
This thread seems a very good attempt to again instigate a LCA vs JF17 debates.. The points of discussion is not new.. No new additional analysis.. The mocking and brandishing many other breakthroughs is not correct..

I fail to understand whats so special that a new thread on this topic is needed and the whole usual bashing starts... Request you all to lock this thread up.. Its only aim is trolling..
 
. .
@Oscar @Irfan Baloch @WAJsal @HRK @waz @Icarus @Slav Defence
This thread seems a very good attempt to again instigate a LCA vs JF17 debates.. The points of discussion is not new.. No new additional analysis.. The mocking and brandishing many other breakthroughs is not correct..

I fail to understand whats so special that a new thread on this topic is needed and the whole usual bashing starts... Request you all to lock this thread up.. Its only aim is trolling..

6 years ago he started a nonsense thread claiming India's Agni missiles are based on Scout rockets as India's SLV is an exact copy of Scout, based on interpretation of a dubious source.

which was very easily debunked in detail by Indian posters

Indian Agni BM Technology origin | Page 6

Indian Agni BM Technology origin | Page 6

Indian Agni BM Technology origin | Page 6

scoutvsslv32.jpg


But to redundantly parrot the same garbage even after 6 years shows the cognitive inertia is still strong.
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom