Areesh
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2010
- Messages
- 45,157
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Constitution bhaion constitution. Constitution k under ho raha hai sub
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sada kutta,kutta ty twada kitta tommy.
Constitution bhaion constitution. Constitution k under ho raha hai sub
Basically they have slapt on the face of sc
Constitution bhaion constitution. Constitution k under ho raha hai sub
Who can, and will hold them accountable?Like I said before. The Supreme Court took a shit on the Constitution and said article 69 is meaningless.
It is a blatant power grab by the SC, and the justices should be shamed of themselves. They MUST be held accountable.
My God, they should immediately appoint you the CJ based on your legal acumen and experience; which is evidently more than the 5 Justices of the Supreme Court including the CJ and the Government's highest Law Officer, the Attorney General of Pakistan.Like I said before. The Supreme Court took a shit on the Constitution and said article 69 is meaningless.
It is a blatant power grab by the SC, and the justices should be shamed of themselves. They MUST be held accountable.
My God, they should immediately appoint you the CJ based on your legal acumen and experience; which is evidently more than the 5 Justices of the Supreme Court including the CJ and the Government's highest Law Officer, the Attorney General of Pakistan.
The fact that the the LHC sides with my argument is more than enough evidence.My God, they should immediately appoint you the CJ based on your legal acumen and experience; which is evidently more than the 5 Justices of the Supreme Court including the CJ and the Government's highest Law Officer, the Attorney General of Pakistan.
Legally, I assume their fellow peers, and Parliament. Unofficially, the army.Who can, and will hold them accountable?
Constitution bhaion constitution. Constitution k under ho raha hai sub
Legally, I assume their fellow peers, and Parliament. Unofficially, the army.
Their peers are gonna side with the SC, even if they disagree they won't challenge the SC.
Parliament has turned into a shit show.
The army's neutral stance which has put Pakistan in danger means that they won't do anything either.
The Justices must be held accountable, but no will do it.
I knew the SC was gonna pull something out of its *** to help the opposition, I just didn't expect them to throw away the Constitution like a used tissue paper.
The Russians had to go out of their way to destroy themselves.I don't know what's worse our duffar CJs or Russian Military.
You do understand the difference of substantive and procedural dealing?The fact that the the LHC sides with my argument is more than enough evidence.
The Law is clear.
Courts not to inquire into proceedings of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)
69. (1) The validity of any proceedings in 1 [Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] shall not be called in question on the ground of any irregularity of procedure.
(2) No officer or member of 1 [Majlis-e-Shoora Parliament)] in whom powers are vested by or under the Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order in 1
[Majlis- e-Shoora (Parliament)], shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.
(3) In this Article, 1 [Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)] has the same meaning as in Article 66
XxxX
Actually read the constitution before opening your mouth. Why do you think there are so many lawyers that are outraged by the SC decision?
The Supreme Court violated Article 69(1) of the Constitution.
Now every idiot can challenge any decision made by the speaker and deputy speaker in the future by directly going to the SC, and the SC would have no choice but to hear them out due to this idiotic decision.
Article 69(1) exists for a very good reason.