That Guy
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2013
- Messages
- 14,553
- Reaction score
- 52
- Country
- Location
If you yourself took the time to read it, you'd understand how bullshit that is.You do understand the difference of substantive and procedural dealing?
What SC gave was wholly under tge umbrella of law, if you had taken the time to read the document published by SC. Then you wouldn't be spewing blatant lies on a public forum
Substantive and procedural are basically the same thing when it comes to this issue.
The Deputy speaker dismissed the motion, which is procedural. The fact that the LHC has basically sided with what everyone was saying (a day after the SC verdict no less) is enough evidence to shut the SC's verdict down.
The SC didn't argue on the reasoning, so your argument of what you seem to think is substantive simply doesn't apply. They didn't say what the deputy speaker said is wrong, they said him dismissing the motion (procedural) is unconstitutional, a verdict which is also unconstitutional itself according to article 69(1).