Dumbledore
BANNED
New Recruit
- Joined
- May 3, 2013
- Messages
- 71
- Reaction score
- 0
China got slapped very hard.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
I couldn't disagree more with your analysis.
This is a time of transition, and none of the paradigms adopted by the previous regime remain sacred. It is clear that the PLA, the PLA AF and the PLAN are modernising rapidly. Slower than they wished, but faster than we are. It is also known to us and to the rest of the world that the military machine that jarred the fillings in the teeth of the victorious US Army emerging from WWII, that swept through Tibet, and that used a brilliant military campaign to beat a hard-bitten professional force only twenty years away from facing down both the Wehrmacht and the Imperial Japanese Army is not to be under-rated at any time. They are not the kind of organisation that gets into ego trips and pushes the envelope, just to impress itself and its girl-friends. Whatever they do, they do for a reason, a national purpose.
The PRC sent us a message, a loud one. They don't want to drag things on, not any more. They want a resolution. Unfortunately, that window when we could have exchanged Aksai Chin for their claims on Arunachal is closed. I doubt that we will get an easy solution, as things stand. But there isn't much choice. We cannot match the Chinese, not with our logistics in the rickety condition that it is in, not with our mountain divisions bereft of a policy for mountain warfare, not with our artillery seriously obsolete, thanks to egregious political neglect by both the Congress and the gormless hyper-nationalists who did nothing except talk up a storm when they were out of power, and tried to fiddle with textbooks and organised pogroms when they were in power. We have insufficient MANPADs, insufficient fire-power at platoon and company level to stop an attacker in the mountains, insufficient stores of ammunition, supplies or food due to our sclerotic supply lines.
This is not the time to fight. We know it, the Chinese know it. They are putting on pressure, and, typically, in Chinese fashion, having put on the pressure, and conveyed clearly what the respective inventory is, they took it off. Now it's up to us. We can respond with realism and intelligence, and cut a deal, whatever the deal is, or we can react like a teenager with raging hormones, and try to fight on emotion, instead of fighting with fighting skills, proper supplies, the right equipment and with good leadership.
Why so many of us think it was a victory for India really defeats me.
Hi, thanks for your post. I kept wondering why & what the Chinese achieved and what the actual story was.
Given our slow pace of modernization viz a viz China, wouldn't it have been better for the Chinese to wait for some other opportune time, say 5 years from now, and apply even greater economic and diplomatic pressure?
With respect i disagree.china is no charitable institution...if it thought it could take what it want with force they would.They pulled back because they are not sure.Their railway logistics[the main lifeline of the invasion] is a huge problem once it comes under aerial and cruise missile attack.And its common wisdom that u need 10:1 superiority fighting an entrenched enemy in mountanous region.In 1962 they had both 10:1 superiority plus surprise.Now they had neither.
Because they want to clear their decks. If you had a strong opponent and a weak opponent, which one would you tackle first? The Chinese want to focus; somewhere Chairman Mao recommended,"Strike with both fists in one direction at once; do not strike with each fist in different directions." They want the little stuff out of the way. They are planning something, or they are planning to be confrontational about something. Somewhere else, not with us.
Hehe..remember my gpa system?? Its out of 10.. I think I will get around 6...
Because they want to clear their decks. If you had a strong opponent and a weak opponent, which one would you tackle first? The Chinese want to focus; somewhere Chairman Mao recommended,"Strike with both fists in one direction at once; do not strike with each fist in different directions." They want the little stuff out of the way. They are planning something, or they are planning to be confrontational about something. Somewhere else, not with us.
Look at it this way. They don't need to do things by force at this point of time. Not when they know that we know that they can do it, if they really want to. They don't want to. They want us out of their face so that they can concentrate - on someone else.
Do we really know that they can do it?I certainly don't.And i think the army doesn't either.The army chief has gone on record multiple times confirming it and most officers that i have met have maintained that there overall power may be superior,but they don't have the force levels necessary to achieve their target.
WHAT ?