Korea as Number One

[Zabaniyah]

Yeah, if Hitler wasn't foolish to attack everyone, Germany would definitely put the first man on the Moon.

It is foolish to compare Germany with a third world nation with absolutely no history of its own.

If Hitler wasn't such a bigot, Germany would have been a superpower by now. And we'd be terraforming other worlds! Brah...

 

[iajj]

If Hitler wasn't such a bigot, Germany would have been a superpower by now. And we'd be terraforming other worlds! Brah...

the crime of austerlitz began - and ended - with his attack on soviet union.

to say otherwise is a jew trick.

 

[Zabaniyah]

the crime of austerlitz began - and ended - with his attack on soviet union.

to say otherwise is a jew trick.

Let's not open a can of worms now

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

If Hitler wasn't such a bigot, Germany would have been a superpower by now. And we'd be terraforming other worlds! Brah...

If Hitler didn't promote his racial ideology and being more patient to deal with the Anglo-American Empire, then he would probably become successful.

Because of his silly racial ideology, many top notch German-Jewish scientists like Einstein had been ended up in US, and he shouldn't be so hasty to conquer everything at once, since Rome wasn't built in a single day, he should be more patient to build up a good foundation for his European Empire, a direct confrontation against the mighty Anglo-American Empire won't be wise.

 

[iajj]

Let's not open a can of worms now

just how old are you? politics is polemical; it is polemics in action, and the least an honest and intelligent adult can morally and responsibly do is to bring a unity of words and deeds - to force to surface polemical speeches that reflect the innate polemicity of political actions. only the dishonorable jews or anglo-americans or dalai lamas of the world seek to conceal true polemics with deceitfully harmless words and universalist discourses.

If Hitler didn't promote his racial ideology and being more patience to deal with the Anglo-American Empire, then he would probably become successful.

Because of his silly racial ideology, many top notch German-Jewish scientists like Einstein had been ended up in US, and he shouldn't be so hasty to conquer everything at once, since Rome wasn't built in a single day, he should be more patient to build up a good foundation for his European Empire, a direct confrontation against the mighty Anglo-American Empire won't be wise.

must no one whitewash the deep criminality of the nazi regime! but the crimes stemmed only from hitler's mad desire to disrupt european balance of power and to subdue france and russia. prosecuting a war against the rootless zionists and anglo-americans cannot possibly constitute a crime because the latter have always been a bigger threat to european and eurasian peace than the maddest continental rulers of all

 

[Götterdämmerung]

If Hitler didn't promote his racial ideology and being more patience to deal with the Anglo-American Empire, then he would probably become successful.

Because of his silly racial ideology, many top notch German-Jewish scientists like Einstein had been ended up in US, and he shouldn't be so hasty to conquer everything at once, since Rome wasn't built in a single day, he should be more patient to build up a good foundation for his European Empire, a direct confrontation against the mighty Anglo-American Empire won't be wise.

The problem is, Nazi ideology is based on racism/xenophobia + nationalism. Without racism there would be no Nazi ideology.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

The problem is, Nazi ideology is based on racism/xenophobia + nationalism. Without racism there would be no Nazi ideology.

That's why a rational guy like Bismarck will be better for Germany.

He was the one who laid the foundation for Germany, while his successors like William II and Hitler did not possess the long term strategic sight like he did.

 

[Götterdämmerung]

That's why a rational guy like Bismarck will be better for Germany.

He was the one who laid the foundation for Germany, while his successors like William II and Hitler did not possess the long term strategic sight like he did.

Wilhelm II was full of inferiority complex due to his English mother who never missed a chance to tell little Willy how great GB was and how insignificant Germany. It was a big family feud amongst the close relatives of European aristocracy. The fate of a nation can be determined by such banal personal sentiments.

 

[Arian]

Given the fact that there are 10 billion more Chinese than Koreans, it is not very fair to compare the two countries. Based on per capita terms, Korea scores higher points on science and many other issues than China.

LOL, if you don't open your mouth no one would think you're dumb, but as soon as you open it you always show it. There are 10 billion more Chinese than Koreans? The earth population is around 7.1, how could they be around 10 billion Chinese more than the Koreans? LOL


Korea is not match for China in technology and science.

 

[Sasquatch]

If Hitler wasn't such a bigot, Germany would have been a superpower by now. And we'd be terraforming other worlds! Brah...

Germany indeed would have been a superpower however it lacked the resources and it drove out some of it's finest scientists, Hitler's racial hatred of the slavs and USSR lead to another nail in the coffin.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Wilhelm II was full of inferiority complex due to his English mother who never missed a chance to tell little Willy how great GB was and how insignificant Germany. It was a big family feud amongst the close relatives of European aristocracy. The fate of a nation can be determined by such banal personal sentiments.

That's why France was always the first prey for the historical German conquerors, since GB was strong because of their strong naval power, while Germany was mostly an inland nation with no connection to the Atlantic Ocean, if France was taken over by Germany, with a such important stragetic position, Germany should gain a good leverage against GB's naval power.

That's also why despite they don't like the French much either, but GB will still never allow Germany to take the control over France, because otherwise they will have no foothold on the Continental Europe.

With the summary of the European history, now i can see that the present Euro currency is the coalition between the Continental European nations, while GB is always a troublemaker for you guys, since they have always sided with their American cousins.

 

[iajj]

Wilhelm II was full of inferiority complex due to his English mother who never missed a chance to tell little Willy how great GB was and how insignificant Germany. It was a big family feud amongst the close relatives of European aristocracy. The fate of a nation can be determined by such banal personal sentiments.

when it comes to the historiography of WWI, i am an unapologetic revisionist: germany didn't egg habsburg on. it was habsburg that dragged germany into the war. german behavior in the start of the crisis and conflict was impeachable. the war was what habsburg wanted and germany only acceded to, given that the two central powers must remain allied even though it means war for the senior and in fact less enthusiastic partner in the alliance. so the talk of war guilt is utterly sinister and has always been pure anglo-saxon propaganda; as such, it always strikes me as superfluous to psychologize the kaiser and the family rivalry between him and the czar and other european monarchs.

now habsburg wanted this war more badly than anyone else, but that doesn't make it any guiltier than germany. the dual monarchy had less choices than lin chong - after what anglo-saxons did to it in italy, in crimea, in serbia.

there was indeed war guilt (even if people didn't talk about war crimes back then), and the guilt belonged exclusively to anglo-saxons.

That's why France was always the first prey for the historical German conquerors, since GB was strong because of their strong naval power, while Germany was mostly an inland nation with no connection to the Atlantic Ocean, if France was taken over by Germany, with a such important stragetic position, Germany should gain a good leverage against GB's naval power.

That's also why despite they don't like the French much either, but GB will still never allow Germany to take the control over France, because otherwise they will have no foothold on the Continental Europe.

With the summary of the European history, now i can see that the present Euro currency is the coalition between the Continental European nations, while GB is always a troublemaker for you guys, since they have always sided with their American cousins.

i completely agree with you: the current crisis may yet turn out to be a chance to forge a franco-german political union that will impose its will on the anglo-saxons, and that is the sweetest vindication of a repeatedly wronged german people yet.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

i completely agree with you: the current crisis may yet turn out to be a chance to forge a franco-german political union that will impose its will on the anglo-saxons, and that is the sweetest vindication of a repeatedly wronged german people yet.

When it is running out of money, can the coalition of the Anglo-American can still remain strong?

The feud between the blood brothers often starts with money.

 

[northeast]

when it comes to the historiography of WWI, i am an unapologetic revisionist: germany didn't egg habsburg on. it was habsburg that dragged germany into the war. german behavior in the start of the crisis and conflict was impeachable. the war was what habsburg wanted and germany only acceded to, given that the two central powers must remain allied even though it means war for the senior and in fact less enthusiastic partner in the alliance. so the talk of war guilt is utterly sinister and has always been pure anglo-saxon propaganda; as such, it always strikes me as superfluous to psychologize the kaiser and the family rivalry between him and the czar and other european monarchs.

now habsburg wanted this war more badly than anyone else, but that doesn't make it any guiltier than germany. the dual monarchy had less choices than lin chong - after what anglo-saxons did to it in italy, in crimea, in serbia.

there was indeed war guilt (even if people didn't talk about war crimes back then), and the guilt belonged exclusively to anglo-saxons.



i completely agree with you: the current crisis may yet turn out to be a chance to forge a franco-german political union that will impose its will on the anglo-saxons, and that is the sweetest vindication of a repeatedly wronged german people yet.

I think germans like anglo-saxons （at least don't hate them），they are all germans.
And germans think south europeans as lazy and weak people.

 

[iajj]

I think germans like anglo-saxons （at least don't hate them），they are all germans.
And germans think south europeans as lazy and weak people.

it is a discussion of politics and international relations, but commoners' feelings. say something more intelligent to join the conversation - and stop shadowing me everywhere.