airmarshal
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 9,361
- Reaction score
- 11
- Country
- Location
The proof which is admissible. The PTI's lawyer first put an allegation on the Additional session judge to have accepted the bribe of 200 million Rupees but when one of the reporters pointed out that putting a false allegation on a session judge may result in a jail of 4 years, the lawyer chickened out. How can ET deliver a statement based on assumption of RO's irregularities and ordering recovery of honorarium yet not even calling a single ROs and POs of those 7 polling station?
I mean how many RO's and PO's be posted there? just 1 RO and 7 PO's and yet the judgment assumes on their conduct even without an inquiry or even a singled one summoned by the ET during the hearing? does it ring any bells?
Irregularity is equal to rigging. An irregularity is practiced with the intent to circumvent the system. PMLN has been in this election system for decades. It knows its flaws. PMLN has been in govt 9 times, 6 times in province and 3 times in centre. What did any PMLN govt do to prevent these irregularities?
PMLN gets a majority vote every time. If their leadership was honest, they would spent their energy at reforming the system. They instead spend their energy on thekaydaari projects like motorway or metro to make commission deposited in offshore accounts.
Baat hai neeyat kee. Neeyat he kharab tau phir saub kuch kharaab.