What's new

Khilji, the first Afghan dyansty of Hindostan

And its always the usual suspects. Shan and his multiple ids and his racist side kicks.

And the former victims and now diehard defenders of religious maniacs, murderers and vandals like Khilji. These converts are forever condemned to worship people who raped them. Thats sad.

Interestingly the cycle continues, look at 1971...
 
. .
All these arguments, religion has nothing to do with it
And the former victims and now diehard defenders of religious maniacs, murderers and vandals like Khilji. These converts are forever condemned to worship people who raped them. Thats sad.

Interestingly the cycle continues, look at 1971...

Same can be said for you guys can it not, forever worshipping a religion that was given to you by the aryans, they raped and abused you, ensured there was a caste system to show you who is the boss.

To this day you guys are still carrying on with it.
 
.
Same can be said for you guys can it not, forever worshipping a religion that was given to you by the aryans, they raped and abused you, ensured there was a caste system to show you who is the boss.

To this day you guys are still carrying on with it.

Genetic studies don't agree with your garbage claims. :laugh:
 
. . .
All these arguments, religion has nothing to do with it


Same can be said for you guys can it not, forever worshipping a religion that was given to you by the aryans, they raped and abused you, ensured there was a caste system to show you who is the boss.

To this day you guys are still carrying on with it.

I agree it had nothing to do with religion. But the no of subcontinental muslims who keep telling me how it was about them muslims ruling us, its like an indian Christian claiming how they ruled us for 200 years, when fact is the british were less racist towards indian Christians than some of the Turkic sultans with local muslim converts.

Your Aryan invasion crap is not only incorrect, also irrelevant. As if I am basking in the imagined glory of the alleged victorious Aryans LOL!
 
.
Wasim Akram was arain you idiot, quite huge biraderi in Pakistan punjab 10 million. All of them were muslims so you won't find them in Indian punjab.

Sorry to say brother but millions of Arain have migrated to Pakistan from India post-1947 and let me tell you that Gen Zia ul Haq was also Indian Arain from Jalandhar.
 
Last edited:
.
Pakistan punjab main biraderis, jats, gujars, janjuas, ghakkars, butts, etc have central asian origin. The main difference is punjabis have 30% ASI and pashtuns 20% ASI. Also punjabi ASI ancestry is older so thats why difference in looks compared to pashtuns etc. If you move out of Indian punjab then average average ASI shot up to 60-80%. Even Indian brahmins who make 4% of population and clearly have more foreign ancestry have 45% ASI because of mixing with locals.

Thats why even Pakistani punjabis looks different then Indians on average let alone pashtuns. There is a reason why bollywood is dominated by Punjabi khatris who migrated from Pakistan.

Brother again your sprouting nonsense. The Bollywood Khatris have no relation with Pakistan ethnically, culturally or racially. All these Khatri clans ie Kapoors, Chopras, Khannas, Malhotras, Kohlis have their native and original lands in East Punjab and Haryana. They only went to Pakistan pre-1947 as merchants, traders, civil servants both during the Mughal and the British era and settled there for pure economic reasons just like Punjabi settlers of Balochistan. Besides this they've nothing to do with Pakistan.
 
.
warrior muslim castes ..hahahahah..could me tell me names of some warrior muslims kings..did ya Punjabi muslims ever ruled yourlseves in you entire history

Well brother definitely there are many Muslim warrior tribes in Sub-Continent eg Pakhtuns, Baloch, Mughal, Turks. As far as Punjabis and Sindhis are concerned they are mostly a people given to husbandry and administrative occupations. So yes you can't expect them to be fighters and warriors. That's why you mostly see the above mentioned tribes and peoples as forming empires and kingdoms and ruling as kings in the history of Sub-Continent.
 
.
Well brother definitely there are many Muslim warrior tribes in Sub-Continent eg Pakhtuns, Baloch, Mughal, Turks. As far as Punjabis and Sindhis are concerned they are mostly a people given to husbandry and administrative occupations. So yes you can't expect them to be fighters and warriors. That's why you mostly see the above mentioned tribes and peoples as forming empires and kingdoms and ruling as kings in the history of Sub-Continent.

Only ruler class from punjab have been sikhs,thats a historical fact
 
.
Only ruler class from punjab have been sikhs,thats a historical fact

Sikhs how many times was there rule and for how long ?.

Once and for a short while if I am not mistaken.
 
.
Does not matter, they where the only ruling Punjabis along with Muslim Janujas.

That's hardly answered the question but I understand if you don't wish to.

There rule was on small scale, the land under them was in no size as considerable as the khiljis, Ghurids, lodhis, Mughals the British.
 
. . .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom