And the point is? You can always find a review of the CJ's performance with SC's board and even have him investigated by the attorney generals office. The problem is, you guys would rather throw away an entire government elected by the people, then actually following the democratic system.
Next time you think about a "military is the only loyal group of people and they should take over", you should always remember the scene from Turkey where thousands of soldiers trying to attempt the coup, had to walk to a jail with their hands up in the air, and thousands were arrested including the generals!!
These lame as* excuses made in your post are there because the military didn't allow a system to be developed. But now its developing and they are losing power fast, every day. This thing in Turkey was one of the most significant things that has shown all dictators and future dictators their "real future", that is try them under treason and throw them in jail. A soldier has nothing of his own, not even a dime!! His clothes / uniform, gun, hat, helmet and the 7 series BMW the generals enjoy, are ALL given to them by Civilians taxes. $$ that could've gone in building hundreds of schools, hospitals, etc, etc. So their gear, cars and tanks are bought by the civilians to defend the country. Not get their nose inside politics, period!!
What has the military done in the past 40 years of Pakistan's history? Here's the "list" of achievements:
1) Starting the early 80's, they introduced the AK-47 culture, and distributed thousands of sub-machine guns to student political parties and hard liner Islamic fractions, resulting in creating smaller militias who have been committing crimes of all kinds since then.
2) Afghan refugees!! Who have done nothing but hit Pakistan with billions of losses every years, billions more in terrorism and they still hate you!! A civil government would've acted differently knowing they can't feed millions of these people. Or, would've kicked them out long go (like its about to happen now)
3) Bad reputation in the entire globe. Creating and funding Talibans and using them as "the strategic depth". A civilian rule would've avoided this as they'd know and would've studied long term effects of this mess.
4) Billions of corruption done by the generals and all other ranks within the military. I can name people and amounts here!!
So the point is, you want one ruling party to go who may have done corruption. But you want them to replace with people who are for sure and proven involved in corruption. How does that work? The only way to fix this, is to let the democratic system get matured. The same people, who threw away the Turkish military and show them their place in the world, can do the same with civilian elected officials if they don't deliver.
But, the supreme force is the people, period. No effing military in the world, no general and certainly no mullahs. So let the majority of the people rule and fix the system slowly. The system was run by the military for like 55 years so the blame goes to them on how corrupt it has become. There is a Civil government in place now, so let the system mature up. The corruption has started to go down in Pakistan and it will go down more as the economy grows and more accountability takes place. Something that the military couldn't even think of doing in their 55 years