What's new

Khaleda was born to be anti-India, just like her master Pakistan : says Awami League

ok you know the right history. can you tell me that is it true that you want to break balochistan from pakistan because your bhagwan head fell there and you want it back. i heard kalboshan yadav was there on same mission.
Hindu myth, Lord Vishnu cut up the body of Sati with his flaming disc into 50 pieces, which fell to the earth. Her head fell at Hinglaj in balochistan.

Was the script in italics an attempt to mock Hindus?

It failed miserably.

And since you are only good at insulting others, I shall not stoop to your level by highlighting similar legends from your religion.

But since you asked, I think my fellow countrymen Hindus on this forum would be in a better position to explain the theory behind this legend. Feel free to tag them in.

The Balochistan matter has come up because it is a clear case of pot calling kettle black.

Please don't start with "evil Yindoos causing problems" again. Your state has been in a state of anarchy due to your regressive military-islamist policies. So much so that even Iran has suffered from militant action of sectarian loonies who use a weakened and economically poor state to do shoot-and-scoot operations.

There was a thread about an organization called Jundollah wreaking havoc within Iranian borders. So much so that Iranian leadership had threatened to send special forces in if your government couldn't reign in elements.

Stay out of our matters and we will not bother you; trouble us in our own matters and we will respond in the same language.

The ball is in your court.

And yes, Hinglaj temple is of historic significance, highlighting the true origins of the land you call Pakistan. Like it or not; revise history or not; This is what your ancestors were; Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs.

No amount of Arabic whitewashing on it will change the reality.
 
.
Was the script in italics an attempt to mock Hindus?

It failed miserably.

And since you are only good at insulting others, I shall not stoop to your level by highlighting similar legends from your religion.

But since you asked, I think my fellow countrymen Hindus on this forum would be in a better position to explain the theory behind this legend. Feel free to tag them in.

The Balochistan matter has come up because it is a clear case of pot calling kettle black.

Please don't start with "evil Yindoos causing problems" again. Your state has been in a state of anarchy due to your regressive military-islamist policies. So much so that even Iran has suffered from militant action of sectarian loonies who use a weakened and economically poor state to do shoot-and-scoot operations.

There was a thread about an organization called Jundollah wreaking havoc within Iranian borders. So much so that Iranian leadership had threatened to send special forces in if your government couldn't reign in elements.

Stay out of our matters and we will not bother you; trouble us in our own matters and we will respond in the same language.

The ball is in your court.

And yes, Hinglaj temple is of historic significance, highlighting the true origins of the land you call Pakistan. Like it or not; revise history or not; This is what your ancestors were; Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs.

No amount of Arabic whitewashing on it will change the reality.
i didn't want to insult hindus.the italic words were put there as a reference from a hindu website. i just asked a question that isn't it the reason india want balochistan badly?
or in more simple words:
modi want to free balochistan as a religious obligation or its just political?
or in even more simple explanation to the reason of asking is that its bjp and rss government. so is the indian government stance on balochistan based on religious facts?
it could be the reason. modi already had that kind of mind.
 
Last edited:
. .
i didn't want to insult hindus.the italic words were put there as a reference from a hindu website. i just asked a question that isn't it the reason india want balochistan badly?
or in more simple words:
modi want to free balochistan as a religious obligation or its just political?
or in even more simple explanation to the reason of asking is that its bjp and rss government. so is the indian government stance on balochistan based on religious facts?
it could be the reason. modi already had that kind of mind.

I don't speak for my Prime Minister. Guess you'll need to listen to his words again and analyse it yourself.

But his message is clear; be good to us and we will walk the extra mile for you. Meddle in our matters and you will be spoken to in the same language.

Simple.

We want nothing more, nothing less.
 
.
I don't speak for my Prime Minister. Guess you'll need to listen to his words again and analyse it yourself.

But his message is clear; be good to us and we will walk the extra mile for you. Meddle in our matters and you will be spoken to in the same language.

Simple.

We want nothing more, nothing less.
now when indians clearly had stated that kashmir is a bilateral issue under simla agreement, under lahore accord, how could it be an indian prime minister call it an internal matter?
how could he compare disputed kashmir with balochistan?
why do he want to get involve in every pakistan issue and forcing pakistan to get involve in every indian issue?
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom