What's new

Kerala women post bare-chested pics on FB To Protest ‘Melon’ Remark On Female Breast

LOL.... what "evil tradition" ? :lol: Only a Christian Fanatic like you will call the traditions of your Native land as "EVIL" and admire the traditions of the Vatican and BRITISH. :sick:

These are pictures from Bali, Indonesia.

889eb352bc06504bf7b275a80dd1f16a.jpg


This is Sri Lanka,

ce24c88f53afcb6b8f7f63a91b2e60ac.jpg
So sad... You are even failing to distinguish between good & bad... You must be in your teenage...
First differentiate between "doing something with consent"(Bali&Indonesia) and Imposing something forcefully because of your caste"... Do any revolt happen if the people were happy with it??? Think before posting non sense...
 
.
So sad... You are even failing to distinguish between good & bad... You must be in your teenage...
First differentiate between "doing something with consent"(Bali&Indonesia) and Imposing something forcefully because of your caste"... Do any revolt happen if the people were happy with it??? Think before posting non sense...

The only imposition on Indian people is the pedophilia from Vatican.
Can you take a message to Pope and ask him to remove his pedophile dirtbags from India - for ever?
 
.
The only imposition on Indian people is the pedophilia from Vatican.
Can you take a message to Pope and ask him to remove his pedophile dirtbags from India - for ever?
Vatican???? Who are that dirty bags from vatican???
 
.
So sad... You are even failing to distinguish between good & bad... You must be in your teenage...
First differentiate between "doing something with consent"(Bali&Indonesia) and Imposing something forcefully because of your caste"... Do any revolt happen if the people were happy with it??? Think before posting non sense...

Rubbish. It had nothing to do with "caste" and everything to do with showing respect to those who were above you in the social structure. You talk as if Bali and sri lanka did not have Varna :lol:

Even the queen had to uncover her top before the king and his family.

Those with lower social status had to uncover before those with higher social status as a sign of respect and civility.

The mapillas women i.e muslim women used to wear shongas on their upper body. The syrian christian women used to wear Kupdyam on their upper body.

The Nair women used to wear the sharf (breast cloth show in painting of queen).

All of which was by consent. The sigh of respect too was by consent.

In the highly military society of kerala, keeping your upper body covered was dangerous because it could be hiding all sort of weapons. That is why the rule to uncover the body cam about. Same as the need to maintain a distance to show respect.

Even today, one has to maintain distance from armed personals all round the world. Maintain distance from political leaders.

The revolt happened because lower caste and dalit christian coverts were allowed to wear the shraf like the Nairs (due to John munros orders) . But higher caste Nadars and Ezhavas were not permitted as per existing laws.

The only imposition on Indian people is the pedophilia from Vatican.
Can you take a message to Pope and ask him to remove his pedophile dirtbags from India - for ever?

You know , kerala kings were so secular that they even permitted the church to impose tax on the people. :lol:

But they taxed the upper caste for even for their social standing. "Chantan mattu meni ponnu" was the tax for using the high caste title.

The church had the right to collect Eight kasu (money) for each cart that used to take the merchandise into the market and Four Kasu for each boat that used to carry the cargo to the port.
 
.
Even today Hindus have to remove their shirt to enter temples. THAT is my proof.

Even today in the south, workers remove the cloth from their shoulder and head, when they meet their boss.

Every south India will know what I am talking about. Every Kerala hindu will know what I am talking about.

This is a painting of an upper caste lady. Its self explanatory, except for a bigot like you.

main-qimg-deee4f64330af5f7e992e96049410898-c

so in india you have to strip to show someone respect? no wonder you have so many sex gurus!
 
.
Rubbish. It had nothing to do with "caste" and everything to do with showing respect to those who were above you in the social structure. You talk as if Bali and sri lanka did not have Varna :lol:

Even the queen had to uncover her top before the king and his family.

Those with lower social status had to uncover before those with higher social status as a sign of respect and civility.

The mapillas women i.e muslim women used to wear shongas on their upper body. The syrian christian women used to wear Kupdyam on their upper body.

The Nair women used to wear the sharf (breast cloth show in painting of queen).

All of which was by consent. The sigh of respect too was by consent.

In the highly military society of kerala, keeping your upper body covered was dangerous because it could be hiding all sort of weapons. That is why the rule to uncover the body cam about. Same as the need to maintain a distance to show respect.

Even today, one has to maintain distance from armed personals all round the world. Maintain distance from political leaders.

The revolt happened because lower caste and dalit christian coverts were allowed to wear the shraf like the Nairs (due to John munros orders) . But higher caste Nadars and Ezhavas were not permitted as per existing laws.
Yeh... Women do it with consent...That's why lower caste woman riots for getting right to hide their breasts from 1813 to 1859...

The Channar Lahala or Channar revolt, also called Maru Marakkal Samaram, refers to the fight from 1813 to 1859 of Nadar climber women in Travancore kingdom for the right to wear upper-body clothes to cover their breasts. This right was previously reserved for Nair women, who were higher-class Hindu women.

In Travancore, Cochin and Malabar, no female was allowed to cover their upper part of the body in front of Upper castes of Kerala until the 19th century. Under the support of Ayya Vaikundar, some communities fought for their right to wear upper clothes and the upper class resorted to attacking them in 1818. In 1819, the Rani of Travancore announced that the lower castes including the Nadar climber women have no right to wear upper clothes like most lower non-Brahmin castes of Kerala. However, the aristocratic Nadan women of the region were exempted from this restriction. Violence against Nadar climber women who revolted against this continued and reached its peak in 1858 across the kingdom, notably in southern taluks of Neyyattinkara and Neyyur.

On 26 July 1859, under pressure from the Madras Governor, the king of Travancore issued a proclamation announcing the right of Nadar climber women to wear upper clothes but on condition that they should not imitate the style of clothing worn by upper class women. Though the proclamation did not quell the tension immediately, it gradually subsided as the social and economical status of Nadar climbers progressed in subsequent decades with significant support from missionaries and Ayya Vaikundar.
In 1858, fresh violence broke out in several places in Travancore and the governor of Madras presidency, Charles Trevelyan, pressured the Travancore king. On 26 July 1859, the king issued a proclamation leading to the restoration of equal rights to wear upper cloth to all Kerala Nadar climber women.

Here's How Kerala's 150-Year-Old Tradition Of Forcing Woman To Keep Their Breasts Uncovered Came To An End

At a time when even the British hadn't made their arrival in India, a part of our nation was plagued by an inhumane practice against women. This social evil prevented womenfolk of Travancore to keep their upper bodies completely bare of clothing. It was a struggle that lasted for a good century and a half, was abolished after the English passed a law, and eventually paved the way for a more intelligent and modern state of Kerala.

1. 150 years ago, women covering their breasts was considered a crime. The practice continued till the middle of the 19th century.
1_1449392232.jpg



2. Only upper caste women belonging to Namboodiri, Brahmin, Kshatriya and Nair clans were allowed to cover their breasts.
3_1449392526.jpg



4. The womenfolk of the lower caste clans were therefore subject to the inhumane practice of laying their breasts bare.
4_1449392618.jpg



4. Still, rules applied to castes differently. A Kshatriya women had to lay her upper body bare in front of Brahmins, a clan of superior beings. However, fearing punishment, almost all women of different castes chose to keep themselves uncovered.
5_1449393073.jpg



5. But this didn't stop the evil from spreading. Once when a queen saw a dalit women in her palace covered with clothing, she ordered the latter to have her breasts cut off.
6_1449403567.jpg



6. The royals also didn't pay any heed to the social evil. Whenever the king's entourage made a public appearance in the city, the upper caste women showered flowers onto them with no clothes covering their own assets.
8_1449394854.jpg



7. At the beginning of the 19th century, however, things started to look better. Workers ventured out from Kerala to Sri Lanka, became aware of social rights and adopted Christianity which allowed women the freedom to cover themselves within and outside the house.
11_1449395570.jpg



8. But men took this change as a personal insult and added injury to the change by violently attacking women and tearing their clothes off.
12_1449395674.jpg




9. The battle continued even after the Blue Diwan of Travancore passed the declaration that allowed women to cover their breasts in 1814. But some women took it upon themselves to retaliate and came forward with their entire bodies covered.
10_1449396061.jpg




10. It was only 26 July, 1859, with the advent of British that a law was passed to put a stop to this social evil and finally liberating the women from the tentacles of male prejudices.
9_1449396269.jpg
 
.
The only imposition on Indian people is the pedophilia from Vatican.
Hey pothead, can I tell you something? Abusing Christians or Muslims don't work. I know you really hate the kafir after the RSS teaching. What about the pedophilia and devadasi system in Hinduism? What about Nara bali (Human sacrifices) in Hinduism? What about superstitions, black magic and primitiveness in Hinduism? Don't jump like a monkey. Drink your daily cow urine and eat the Gobar and sleep in the Gau shala in Nagpur GHQ.
 
.
Yeh... Women do it with consent...That's why lower caste woman riots for getting right to hide their breasts from 1813 to 1859...

The Channar Lahala or Channar revolt, also called Maru Marakkal Samaram, refers to the fight from 1813 to 1859 of Nadar climber women in Travancore kingdom for the right to wear upper-body clothes to cover their breasts. This right was previously reserved for Nair women, who were higher-class Hindu women.

In Travancore, Cochin and Malabar, no female was allowed to cover their upper part of the body in front of Upper castes of Kerala until the 19th century. Under the support of Ayya Vaikundar, some communities fought for their right to wear upper clothes and the upper class resorted to attacking them in 1818. In 1819, the Rani of Travancore announced that the lower castes including the Nadar climber women have no right to wear upper clothes like most lower non-Brahmin castes of Kerala. However, the aristocratic Nadan women of the region were exempted from this restriction. Violence against Nadar climber women who revolted against this continued and reached its peak in 1858 across the kingdom, notably in southern taluks of Neyyattinkara and Neyyur.

On 26 July 1859, under pressure from the Madras Governor, the king of Travancore issued a proclamation announcing the right of Nadar climber women to wear upper clothes but on condition that they should not imitate the style of clothing worn by upper class women. Though the proclamation did not quell the tension immediately, it gradually subsided as the social and economical status of Nadar climbers progressed in subsequent decades with significant support from missionaries and Ayya Vaikundar.
In 1858, fresh violence broke out in several places in Travancore and the governor of Madras presidency, Charles Trevelyan, pressured the Travancore king. On 26 July 1859, the king issued a proclamation leading to the restoration of equal rights to wear upper cloth to all Kerala Nadar climber women.

LOL... did you copy paste that from Wikipedia ? :lol:

The TRUTH is somewhat less appetizing for Chrislamist like you.

In 1813 after British John Monroe became the Diwan, he issued an order granting permission to women who had converted to Christianity, the right to wear upper cloth.

This was in contravening to existing laws that was designed to keep social stability in Kerala. i.e. Those of lower social status to uncover upper body before those of higher social status.

When the protest by Hindu women started, the law was modified to allow them to dress like syrian christians or muslim women.

But the Upper caste Nadar and Ezhavas wanted the same rights as the lower caste christian converts who were allowed to wear the Nair Sharf. That is the root case of the revolt. Not some fantastic lies about "breast tax".

Later, the queen removed this law when it was found that the Nadars were converting into christianity to wear this sharf.

It was the bigotry of the christian john munroe that gave special rights to christian converts that started this social unrest in Kerala. :lol:

Not because they had a problem with uncovering their top in the hot and humid climate of kerala.

Yeh... Women do it with consent...That's why lower caste woman riots for getting right to hide their breasts from 1813 to 1859...

The Channar Lahala or Channar revolt, also called Maru Marakkal Samaram, refers to the fight from 1813 to 1859 of Nadar climber women in Travancore kingdom for the right to wear upper-body clothes to cover their breasts. This right was previously reserved for Nair women, who were higher-class Hindu women.

In Travancore, Cochin and Malabar, no female was allowed to cover their upper part of the body in front of Upper castes of Kerala until the 19th century. Under the support of Ayya Vaikundar, some communities fought for their right to wear upper clothes and the upper class resorted to attacking them in 1818. In 1819, the Rani of Travancore announced that the lower castes including the Nadar climber women have no right to wear upper clothes like most lower non-Brahmin castes of Kerala. However, the aristocratic Nadan women of the region were exempted from this restriction. Violence against Nadar climber women who revolted against this continued and reached its peak in 1858 across the kingdom, notably in southern taluks of Neyyattinkara and Neyyur.

On 26 July 1859, under pressure from the Madras Governor, the king of Travancore issued a proclamation announcing the right of Nadar climber women to wear upper clothes but on condition that they should not imitate the style of clothing worn by upper class women. Though the proclamation did not quell the tension immediately, it gradually subsided as the social and economical status of Nadar climbers progressed in subsequent decades with significant support from missionaries and Ayya Vaikundar.
In 1858, fresh violence broke out in several places in Travancore and the governor of Madras presidency, Charles Trevelyan, pressured the Travancore king. On 26 July 1859, the king issued a proclamation leading to the restoration of equal rights to wear upper cloth to all Kerala Nadar climber women.

Here's How Kerala's 150-Year-Old Tradition Of Forcing Woman To Keep Their Breasts Uncovered Came To An End

At a time when even the British hadn't made their arrival in India, a part of our nation was plagued by an inhumane practice against women. This social evil prevented womenfolk of Travancore to keep their upper bodies completely bare of clothing. It was a struggle that lasted for a good century and a half, was abolished after the English passed a law, and eventually paved the way for a more intelligent and modern state of Kerala.

1. 150 years ago, women covering their breasts was considered a crime. The practice continued till the middle of the 19th century.
1_1449392232.jpg



2. Only upper caste women belonging to Namboodiri, Brahmin, Kshatriya and Nair clans were allowed to cover their breasts.
3_1449392526.jpg



4. The womenfolk of the lower caste clans were therefore subject to the inhumane practice of laying their breasts bare.
4_1449392618.jpg



4. Still, rules applied to castes differently. A Kshatriya women had to lay her upper body bare in front of Brahmins, a clan of superior beings. However, fearing punishment, almost all women of different castes chose to keep themselves uncovered.
5_1449393073.jpg



5. But this didn't stop the evil from spreading. Once when a queen saw a dalit women in her palace covered with clothing, she ordered the latter to have her breasts cut off.
6_1449403567.jpg



6. The royals also didn't pay any heed to the social evil. Whenever the king's entourage made a public appearance in the city, the upper caste women showered flowers onto them with no clothes covering their own assets.
8_1449394854.jpg



7. At the beginning of the 19th century, however, things started to look better. Workers ventured out from Kerala to Sri Lanka, became aware of social rights and adopted Christianity which allowed women the freedom to cover themselves within and outside the house.
11_1449395570.jpg



8. But men took this change as a personal insult and added injury to the change by violently attacking women and tearing their clothes off.
12_1449395674.jpg




9. The battle continued even after the Blue Diwan of Travancore passed the declaration that allowed women to cover their breasts in 1814. But some women took it upon themselves to retaliate and came forward with their entire bodies covered.
10_1449396061.jpg




10. It was only 26 July, 1859, with the advent of British that a law was passed to put a stop to this social evil and finally liberating the women from the tentacles of male prejudices.
9_1449396269.jpg

Your own post expose your LIES :lol:

This is what happens when ignorant fools attempt propaganda.

THIS is a UPPER CASTE NAIR GIRL :lol:

6_1449403567.jpg



In THIS picture one can clearly see that only the Queen has covered her upper body, EVERYBODY else has their upper body uncovered. :lol:

3_1449392526.jpg
 
.
LOL... did you copy paste that from Wikipedia ? :lol:

The TRUTH is somewhat less appetizing for Chrislamist like you.

In 1813 after British John Monroe became the Diwan, he issued an order granting permission to women who had converted to Christianity, the right to wear upper cloth.

This was in contravening to existing laws that was designed to keep social stability in Kerala. i.e. Those of lower social status to uncover upper body before those of higher social status.

When the protest by Hindu women started, the law was modified to allow them to dress like syrian christians or muslim women.

But the Upper caste Nadar and Ezhavas wanted the same rights as the lower caste christian converts who were allowed to wear the Nair Sharf. That is the root case of the revolt. Not some fantastic lies about "breast tax".

Later, the queen removed this law when it was found that the Nadars were converting into christianity to wear this sharf.

It was the bigotry of the christian john munroe that gave special rights to christian converts that started this social unrest in Kerala. :lol:

Not because they had a problem with uncovering their top in the hot and humid climate of kerala.
Not from Wikipedia... Quoting a good source is better than womitting anything like you...
So woman riots to get their breast covered when Christians starts doing that... That is called progress... Also they struggled 50 years to get that right...You behaving like an idiot more backward than a radical muslim... Why you not going back to your oldern good tradition now?? Start it from your house only... Is the climate becomes cooler now than 150 years ago...
 
.
Ancient picture of Upper caste Nair Men and women.

184455_10151370296966944_1607404975_n.jpg


Not from Wikipedia... Quoting a good source is better than womitting anything like you...
So woman riots to get their breast covered when Christians starts doing that... That is called progress... Also they struggled 50 years to get that right...You behaving like an idiot more backward than a radical muslim... Why you not going back to your oldern good tradition now?? Start it from your house only... Is the climate becomes cooler now than 150 years ago...

LOL .... ya right. Christian women cover their breasts :lol:

The very definition of "progress" :lol:

images


images


Here is to "christian women progress" :lol:

0511-johnny-manziel-topless-woman-girls-cancun-photos-primary-2-1200x630.jpg
 
.
Hey pothead, can I tell you something? Abusing Christians or Muslims don't work. I know you really hate the kafir after the RSS teaching. What about the pedophilia and devadasi system in Hinduism? What about Nara bali (Human sacrifices) in Hinduism? What about superstitions, black magic and primitiveness in Hinduism? Don't jump like a monkey. Drink your daily cow urine and eat the Gobar and sleep in the Gau shala in Nagpur GHQ.

telling truth is not abusing mate...

If you want to see what abuse looks like you should hear what the Vatican mafia says about Hindus...
 
.
Ancient picture of Brahmin women going to temple. Notice how they removed their upper cloth and slung it over their shoulder to give respect to god.

nairladies.jpg


telling truth is not abusing mate...

If you want to see what abuse looks like you should hear what the Vatican mafia says about Hindus...

Dude his post to you itself was abusing of hinduism.
 
.
Ancient picture of Upper caste Nair Men and women.

184455_10151370296966944_1607404975_n.jpg
How many times to say same thing for your understanding??? Lower caste woman are forcefully denied the right to hide their breasts... That's why they rioted... But nair women were allowed to use a thorth or a cloth to cover their breasts... it was not unusual for Nair women to not cover their breasts in the 19th century...

[/QUOTE]
LOL .... ya right. Christian women cover their breasts :lol:

The very definition of "progress" :lol:

images


images
[/QUOTE]
Yeh... Will use sari in beaches...:yahoo:...
Distinguish between different situations??? Do these women are forced to stay bare chested before their sons by any law???
You are surprising with your weird logics...
Ha ha... Why you use the mobile phone invented by christians?? Do make one with your Vedas for real progress...:omghaha:
 
.
How many times to say same thing for your understanding??? Lower caste woman are forcefully denied the right to hide their breasts... That's why they rioted... But nair women were allowed to use a thorth or a cloth to cover their breasts... it was not unusual for
women to not cover their breasts in the 19th century...

LOL .... ya right. Christian women cover their breasts :lol:

The very definition of "progress" :lol:

images


images

Yeh... Will use sari in beaches...:yahoo:...
Distinguish between different situations??? Do these women are forced to stay bare chested before their sons by any law???
You are surprising with your weird logics...
Ha ha... Why you use the mobile phone invented by christians?? Do make one with your Vedas for real progress...:omghaha:


LOL ....... sure.

When white christian women does it its Freedom.

When brown Hindu women does it, its oppression. :lol:


Bigotry of the chrislamist on full display. You disgust me. :tdown:
 
.
LOL ....... sure.

When white christian women does it its Freedom.

When brown Hindu women does it, its oppression. :lol:


Bigotry of the chrislamist on full display. You disgust me. :tdown:

He inspires me.

Look at his ilk. In spite of the Vatican mafia destroying millions of Children, they are steadfast in their support for these pedophiles.

We Hindus can never achieve the same shamelessness as their kind no matter how much we try.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom