What's new

Kashmiri University students insult Indian national anthem.

.
I have come to accept certain facts and never gave much thought to them as well but this editing of a news article to project a wrong picture is the first of a kind - so I am bit surprised and is disappointing.

I remember the time when the admin team here used to be much more impartial and focused purely on ensuring sanctity of discussions.. But as I said in the post that was deleted, frustration does funny things to people..
 
. .
For Kashmiris Indian is nothing more then an occupying force , Like British were to India , they also did a lots of development , but were never accepted . same is the situation with india , you can build then Castles of Diamonds , and they still wont accept them as a Part of India .

That is the reality , whether my fellow Indians accept it or not
 
.
Kashmir University pupils insult national anthem


TNN | Jun 18, 2013, 03.27 AM IS

SRINAGAR:Kashmir University faculty members and students remained seated when the national anthem was played much to the embarrassment for authorities after the arrival of Chief Justice of India Altamas Kabir on the campus on Monday.The Chief Justice visited the university to address the faculty and students of the Law department,Officials refused to comment on the incident.


Kashmir University pupils insult national anthem - The Times of India


Kashmiri Students ‘Slight’ India’s National Anthem - Free Press Kashmir

4221792-372515-waving-flag-of-azad-kashmir.jpg
Kashmir never was and never will be part of India Kashmir will achieve its independence soon either easily or through war but it will get independence from Indian occupation and Indian state terrorism against its women children and men
 
.
My venom is ... at the idea of eliminating an entire people.

Sir, as per objective neutral observers, the people of Indian administered Kashmir enjoy greater freedom than those of Pakistan administered Kashmir (see Refworld | Freedom in the World 2009 - Kashmir [Pakistan] and Refworld | Freedom in the World 2009 - Kashmir [India])

We are not eliminating people, but are patiently countering extremist ideologies and narratives. The silent majority in J&K have responded by repeatedly reposing their faith in Indian democracy, despite calls for boycotts from foreign-sponsored violent extremist elements.
 
.
Usually i am a very liberal person , but if you live in our country (obviously they do not think its theirs) then you need to respect certain practices. respecting the national flag is one of them .

If on the other hand they feel they will be better off someplace else . by all means let them go to the land of the pure.




You should stop drinking or smoking that funny stuff because it makes you say silly things.

They live on their own Kashmiri land and they don't plan on going anywhere.

They simply want you to remove your rear end from their occupied land.
 
.
For Kashmiris Indian is nothing more then an occupying force , Like British were to India , they also did a lots of development , but were never accepted . same is the situation with india , you can build then Castles of Diamonds , and they still wont accept them as a Part of India .

That is the reality , whether my fellow Indians accept it or not

if Kashmir is occupied so is kalat princely state, your are also having agitation in that part as well as entire baluchistan region, I wouldn't comment on other baluch regions except kalat because of other regions were accessed with out force but kalat was not.
 
.
if Kashmir is occupied so is kalat princely state, your are also having agitation in that part as well as entire baluchistan region, I wouldn't comment on other baluch regions except kalat because of other regions were accessed with out force but kalat was not.

Kalat is not occupied as per international law.
By your logic, we could also say Hyderabad and West Bengal are occupied. :omghaha:
 
.
Kashmir has been part of India for the past 5000 years and will be part of India for the next 5000 years.

Arabian imported ideologies may come and go but that fact will not change.




River Indus used to be part of India for 5000 years. So was Moenjadaro, harrappa but sadly they are no longer part of India and Arabian imported Religion reigns supreme over there. Your theory is already shred to pieces, so what the heck are you talking about ?
 
.
if Kashmir is occupied so is kalat princely state, your are also having agitation in that part as well as entire baluchistan region, I wouldn't comment on other baluch regions except kalat because of other regions were accessed with out force but kalat was not.

Remind me this , when we have stationed half a million of our Army to suppress them(Like in Kashmir) ... until then these are all your wet dreams , & i cannot stop you from that .
 
.
River Indus use to be part of India for 5000 years. So was Moenjadaro, harrappa but sadly they are no longer part of India and Arabian imported Religion reigns supreme there. Your theory is already shred to pieces, so what the heck are you talking about ?

It is true that many people in the area presently known as Pakistan have succumbed to imported Arab ideologies. Yet the process of evolution does not stop ... we should not assume that they will never come out of their present plight.
 
.
It is true that many people in the area presently known as Pakistan have succumbed to imported Arab ideologies. Yet the process of evolution does not stop ... we should not assume that they will never come out of their present plight.

You cannot even respect the religion of majority of Kashmiris. And expect Kashmiris to respect your pathetic jana gana mana? How childish.

The process of evolution seems to be working against you guys if we consider the demography of Indian states like Assam and West Bengal. ;)
 
.
Kalat is not occupied as per international law.
By your logic, we could also say Hyderabad and West Bengal are occupied. :omghaha:

Kashmir is also not occupied as per International law. International bodies do not consider kashmir as an independent entity occupied by India or Pakistan. It is simply a disputed area, ownership of which is disputed between India and Pakistan. No international provision of UNSC resolution provides for an option of an independent Kashmir. And its funny that the so called champions of kashmir cause on this forum are devoid of this basic understanding of the kashmir dispute...
 
.
It is true that many people in the area presently known as Pakistan have succumbed to imported Arab ideologies. Yet the process of evolution does not stop ... we should not assume that they will never come out of their present plight.

We Pakistanis are the ones who made Indus Valley and spread ourr religion (Hinduism) to South indian barbarians (your people)

inshallah we pakistani will be the one again who spread our religion (islam) to barbarians (your people) and in the process destroying many pagan structures like our ancestrors at somnath

Superior over Inferior...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom