Contrarian
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 11,571
- Reaction score
- 4
This is not a Hindu Vs Muslim debate. This is a territorial debate. Let us keep it so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let us ignore trolls...
This is not a Hindu Vs Muslim debate. This is a territorial debate. Let us keep it so.
Chaps unfortunately the J&K imbroglio is strongly influenced by communal factors, right since 1947.Originally Posted by malaymishra123
This is not a Hindu Vs Muslim debate. This is a territorial debate. Let us keep it so.
I totally agree.
Chaps unfortunately the J&K imbroglio is strongly influenced by communal factors, right since 1947.
J&K accession to India is not acceptable to Pakistan mainly because J&K is predominantly a Muslim state and India a state with majority Hindus.
Chaps unfortunately the J&K imbroglio is strongly influenced by communal factors, right since 1947.
This is going to be a problem.
India will not take pakistans word that it has cracked down on the freedom movement and dismantled training camps.
In the same way pakistan will not accept india being judge and jury on whether cross border movement is taking place or not.
Would you accept a third party to verify if cross border movement is taking place and if the camps have been dismantled?
When would the 1/2 year period start from.
I think the pakistanis would want the time period from the start of peace process to be included in the timeframe of 1/2 years.
Please not the ISI again.Why is it when anything bad is going on in india its the ISI fault.
I think you overrate the ISI.
Yes i see where your coming from but from a pakistani point of view if the core conflict is not resolved then all other "pre-requisites" will not be carried through and will become only window dressing.
http://www.nio.gov.uk/the-agreement
LOL, im seeing it now dude!malaymishra123 malaymishra123 malaymishra123
Bro i think you missed my response to your suggestions.I hope you can add more after reading my questions.
IT IS ON PAGE 17 NEAR THE BOTTOM.
Its not the problem of taking Pakistan's word. Its simple, when the Indian intelli agencies dont find terrorists being aided by Pakistan, then they will continue on the CBM's. They would have no point to lie that Pakistan is still aiding terrorists, since its a pre-requisite to further talks.This is going to be a problem.
India will not take pakistans word that it has cracked down on the freedom movement and dismantled training camps.
Seeing as India is the one where terrorists find most comfortable to blow up, Pakistan will have to accept the fact that India will decide whether terorists are being aided by Pakistan in cross border infilteration or not.In the same way pakistan will not accept india being judge and jury on whether cross border movement is taking place or not.
I suppose yes, but thats my viewpoint.Would you accept a third party to verify if cross border movement is taking place and if the camps have been dismantled?
The period would start from the time terrorist training camps are destroyed and cross border infilteration has stopped.When would the 1/2 year period start from.
I think the pakistanis would want the time period from the start of peace process to be included in the timeframe of 1/2 years.
No. ISI is not some super-secret organisation. It gets cash for a single purpose, to fund Indian separatists. Indian intelligence agencies are normally aware when this happens.Please not the ISI again.Why is it when anything bad is going on in india its the ISI fault.
I think you overrate the ISI.
The core-conflict will only be resolved when the terrorism stops. GoI has said this many time, and i beileve it is right. If terrorists are still present, then there cannot be peace, while they blow up people in India.Yes i see where your coming from but from a pakistani point of view if the core conflict is not resolved then all other "pre-requisites" will not be carried through and will become only window dressing.
found guilty of killing innocents would not be spared".
Two policemen were arrested earlier this week and two senior officers suspended after a youth was allegedly killed in a shootout staged by the police.
The family members of the youth ââ¬â Abdul Rehman Paddar, resident of Larnoo village in Anantnag district ââ¬â had filed a complaint at the Batmaloo police station in Srinagar on Jan 23, saying the youngster was abducted by unknown people from Batmaloo on Dec 8.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1916164,000900010002.htm
Hindustan times, I dont believe it.
What a hypocrite you are? When we post Indian articles you say Indian media have no crebility left and when you want to prove a point you use the very same media whch you criticised.