Kashmir | News & Discussions.

[majesticpankaj]

WE??????? We are not talking about Bhartis aka Indians we are talking about Kashmiris and the showing of Pakistani Private NEWS channels by cable operators proves that People of Kashmir want to watch these unbiased, neutral news sources instead of Indian propaganda.


The forced ban by Indian occupying govt proves that Bhartis are afraid of truth and bhartis know in their heart that Kashmiris want to watch these channels.

Big PERIOD

kashmiris are indians, they use indian passport and indian documents. and as per parliament, kasmir is integral part of india. we consider them as indian. pls accept the reality. by saying ur news channel neutral , u substantiate my claim.

 

[Dr.Evil]

Cable operators are not stopped from showing Indian news channels. And Punjab's areas India get Indian channels even through normal antenna, the Govt of Pakistan did not take any measure to stop the signals unlike Indian orange govt

Until a few days ago, you guys were crying no pak channels were being shown in India. Which all lies being propagated by some pak members on this forum

Now that we are stopping pak news channels ( propaganda channels ) you are crying again.

Weren't some members on this forum saying Indian cable operators must provide all the pak channels even if they dont want to.

Your hypocracy knows no bounds, atleast stick to one stand.

 

[navtrek]

I see many Indians doing that in Singapore! Sometime they hold by last fingers not hands!

There is a Russel peter joke on this. But they are not really gay.

 

[Dr.Evil]

The order is an act of frustration. Pakistani channels have been banned in the "largest democracy in the world" because the Pakistani channels discussed and showed the mass graves of Kashmiris. The mass graves are for victims of the excesses of the 100,000 Indian security forces that are present in Occupied Jammu and Kashmir.

Obviously the present puppet government in Occupied Jammu and Kashmir does not want the denizens of the valley to be aware that the Indian Security forces murdered and then buried innocent Kashmiri civilians in mass graves.

The situation appears to be heading toward 1947 situation when hot potatoes were stuck into the mouths of people who listened to Radio Pakistan.

But I believe the blocking of TV channels is not going to make a major difference. All channels are available on Internet and those can be watch on smaller screen.

"suchai jhup nahin sukti banawat keh asoolon seh

kushboo aa nahin suktee kaghaz keh phoolon seh"

How many times were indian channels banned in Pakistan and every second day, your senators ask for their banning in the parliment.

Even to this day no Indian news channels are available in pakistan.

Stop whining now.

We are still allowing pak based entertainment channels and just stopped propaganda news channels.

 

[Hafizzz]

I see many Indians doing that in Singapore! Sometime they hold by last fingers not hands!

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/01/business/global/01outbiz.html

 

[ek_indian]

I admit I did not read the article. But topic was utter nonsense.

If we need to learn something from our neighbour, developing conspiracy theories must not be one of them.

 

[Dr.Evil]

Why the hell would they support jihadis in Kashmir when they know that this spirit is causing them problems in Xinjiang already.

You think they are stupid to create problems for themselves? I think not.

Tell the idiot who authored this to waste his time over something else.

Its not the Jihadi's they support directly but the pak govt. which they protect.

Even when JUD was being sanctioned and banned in the UN, China tried their best to help pak out of the difficult situation.

In that sense they are indirectly helping the Jihadis.

 

[sparklingway]

Its not the Jihadi's they support directly but the pak govt. which they protect.

So by your logic if A supports B, and B kills C, then A should share some guilt for the crime?

Even when JUD was being sanctioned and banned in the UN, China tried their best to help pak out of the difficult situation.

JuD being banned in the UN is some serious business and we protested it since we had not yet established their direct role. China stood by our stance.

In that sense they are indirectly helping the Jihadis.

Wrong logic and completely stupid news article since that states that China is somehow directly sheltering people involved in terrorism.

 

[karan.1970]

Futile attempt by the GOI. Sooner or later India has to move it's butt out of IOK. I wonder why they take such useless actions.

Fiutile exercise by some Pakstanis for last 60 years. Sooner or Later, they will need to start getting bothered with whats happening inside their country instead of whats happening outside it. The results of doing that are not looking good at this time..

 

[Dr.Evil]

JuD being banned in the UN is some serious business and we protested it since we had not yet established their direct role. China stood by our stance.

Even to this it had not been established that JUD is is terrorist organisation according to pakistan but it does not have qualms about arresting its office bearers today and sealing more of its office.

Pakistan does not have the will to take action against any terrorist organistation acting against India.

 

[Frankenstein]

i asked also simple question you can block channel and we cant now why double standard

Last time I checked, There were some star channels like star plus, star world bla bla, working well in Pakistan??

 

[Dr.Evil]

Last time I checked, There were some star channels like star plus, star world bla bla, working well in Pakistan??

They are entertainment channels not News Channels.

Indian News Channels are banned in Pakistan from a long time.

 

[sec9941]

why its Banned

strange another blame game

 

[Dr.Evil]

why its Banned
is Pakistani Channel Show cows???

Atleast try to complete the sentence, understandable to everyone.

 

[s90]

Are Pakistani entertainment channels accessible to you guys?