and what are those conditions kindly light up.India accepted the condition of plebiscite as part of the Instrument of accession as well as under the UNSC resolutions, so to argue that 'J&K is not disputed' flies in the face of what India and the UN has already agreed to.
The UNSC resolutions AND the condition of plebiscite under the Instrument of Accession, both accepted by India and Pakistan - that basis. As for resettlement, no one has argued against resettlement or not tracking and taking into account the votes of the Pandits, or for that matter the million or so Kashmiris from AK settled in Europe, especially the UK.
As for 'stop violating the ceasefire', that occurs just as much from your side, so Indians certainly have no room to be pointing fingers on that count, and as for any other progress, as soon as India indicates that it will stop reneging on its pledge to allow the Kashmiris to exercise self-determination and move towards ending its occupation.
No plebiscite unless until terrorism is stopped and invader leaves the land!!!
above is the answer of my question to you.