What's new

Kashmir | News & Discussions.

So, is new media only reinforcing old stereotypes?


  • Total voters
    44
Wow...damn these mother****ing Indian soldiers beating innocent civilians

Ironic that the police beat them, as opposed to them beating themselves...

That's not police....thats indian army beating civilians in broad daylight

I am sorry to say this but the shias need to pick up arms and beat the indians army out to mark ashura in Kashmir instead of beating senses out of themselves
 
.
this is a holy time.....for all Muslims - not just Shiites.


and they should be able to do their processions free from impediments and barricades
 
.
Aren't most of the processions restricted because it leads to communal tension when passing through areas dominated by people from the other community ?

I have heard of a number of riots in Lucknow which were sparked by these processions.
 
.
this is a holy time.....for all Muslims - not just Shiites.


and they should be able to do their processions free from impediments and barricades
Yeah, i agree in theory, but Islam doesn't require you to commemorate the death of your forefathers when you're being oppressed yourself and a war is imposed on you....rather the hour of need is that you fight your oppressors and by doing so you'd make your God and forefathers proud b/c you stood up for them
 
.
sectarianism has never really been a problem in occupied Kashmir.....for obvious reasons
 
. .
police(law and order) is a state concern in india, so it was the J&K police not the imaginary indian police which was involved in the incident.

J&K police like the police in other indian sates is entirely under the state government and not under the central government so please dont blame india for yet another brutality against kashmiris.

also if it is against the law, you are not supposed to start such processions. the police must have done what was necessasry to scatter the crowd. it is unfortunate that some people got injured.
 
.
@firefighter

look closely , it is policemen in the photograph. the beret they are wearing. army doesnt wear such berets.

also where are the guns. soldiers on duty wont be caught dead without their service weapons.

also look at the person on the left most in the photo. he has a beard. not allowed by the army.

so i can safely claim that it was the police and not the army
 
.
Because india and pakistan are on war all the time. india dont trust paksitan. and extremist groups existing and haing safe haven in pakistan.

because india dont want to have - 26/11 every week.

no free trade untill - pakistan stop helping let and other so called jehadi --terrorist groups.

since india need to strengthen its border - they are having hard time entering and terrorizing india. so in frustration they bomb pakistan itself - see whats happening around you.

violence cant be solution to this war !!!!!:cheers:

Oh, and i suppose India is playing the role of the Damsel in distress in this epic war ? Buddy, India is about as innocent in this war as Monicca Lewinski is in the Clinton Case..................Do the math...........:cheers:
 
.
Let the darn idiot's go to Pk who cares for them and as far as Kashmir is concerned it will remain part of India no matter what.
 
.
In the indian democracy everyone has right to speak,weather they are capitalist or separatist.It is the greatness of the indian system, which our neighbours can't understand.in fact they don't know the meaning of democracy :rofl:
another thing Mr geelani has right to speak only, not the right to act.:rofl::rofl:
 
.
Let the darn idiot's go to Pk who cares for them and as far as Kashmir is concerned it will remain part of India no matter what.

Thank you for your hilarious and repetitive view. No one is going to be leaving Kashmir any time soon so that dream is pretty much crushed.

"God does not forbid you, with regard to those who fight you not for (your) faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly with them: for God loves those who are just."(Qur'an 60:7-8)

So Kashmir becoming part of India is highly unlikely, however a resolution such as the Chenab formula is likely.
 
. .
There are two things wrong;

One, Claiming Shias to be unIslamic; well NONE of the Ulemas have declared Shias as Non-Muslims, they are yet to be classified as such, so till the time it doesnt happen, the best thing to do is to accept them as Muslims.

Two, if someone believes that something is 'wrong' because it creates 'unrest' and it must be stopped by force then he should re-read democracy and freedom of choice. Why dont we beat out the Christians or the Hindus going to their worship places? We celebrated X-mas, didnt we? So would Holi and Diwali would be! It also concerns a few people in the neighborhood when they see these occasions being celebrated, so shouldnt every country ban other religious practices on this stupid plea?
 
.
And what happened to the proud secular indian flag, hats off to the indian freedom of religious practices and the secular face, you guys never stop amazing me!


As for your problem with violence, well if no other country bans this practice, why should secular hindustan do that?

Or do you want that the disgusting practices that some hindus do should also be dealt with violently?!

You need to understand one thing, religious freedom entails free allowance of holy acts/practices unless the Constitution bans it. Or may be if the indian sensibilities are so shy, why dont you restrict them at some particular place, street, corner, ground, mosque etc so that the sensitive eyes of my fellow indians dont witness the 'gruesome' activities?

Wont that be more desirable, noble, acceptable and as par with the secular indian stature??
 
.
Back
Top Bottom