deckingraj
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
- Messages
- 5,192
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
That's completely speculative, and the plebiscite is to show the sentiments of Kashmiris, not Kashmiris from 1948-49, I fail to see where you derive that particular interpretation from. The Kashmir dispute has not ceased to be a dispute since then, and the principle behind resolving the dispute remains the same - allow the Kashmiris to decide.
And only a handful of locals needed to *** out the infiltrators, that too is not indicative of whether most Kashmiris would have chosen Pakistan or not.
KAGK was tremendously popular in NWFP, and he was pro-becoming a part of the Indian Union, yet despite his boycott, over 50% of the electorate showed up at the polls, and 95-98% voted for Pakistan.
Hi Agnostic Muslim
Apologies to jump into your very informative conversation with Ejaz..However could not help as i like other's have very strong views on this subject...
why plebiscite was not held??
Well not going into who did wrong blah blah...One of the conditions was Pak will remove its army from ***(in your words Azad Kashmir) and it never happened...I am sure you would also question India's intentions and actions. So lets say that both parties are responsible for it...
Does it make sense now
The bigger question is does it make sense to have plebiscite now?? What about the people who dont want to remain with India or Pak or for that matter no-one??? what about kashmiri Pandits who have been forced out of Kashmir for decades???
To me it honestly make no sense......It would have made sense then(1947) but now its almost the third generation out and for them what matters most is economic progress in their beautiful but violence prone valley...
Now few more questions.....
Why kashmiri's have the right to choose what country they should stay with and not other states like Balochistan, India's Punjab??? Don't get me wrong here...but on larger front i would like to know why India and Pakistani's are that much interested in Kashmiri's will...Isn't Kashmir issue more of an ego-clash between India and pakistan???? To me its all politics...Unfortunately a little more in yours country than in mine...
I being a sikh have remorse of loosing Nankana saheb during partition. However unfortunate but that's the reality...I cannot and should not ignore it...Same is true with kashmir...
- It was a princely state..and as per my knowledge princely states had the right to choose what country they want to join irrespective of their majority population
- Pakistan forced Kashmir ruler to join Pakistan but he choosed india
- Pakistan and India fought a war and after which Nehru went into UNO promised plebiscite
- one of the condition was Pak will move out its army from *** which never heppened
- Plebiscite as promised by India never happened
_ India pak fought 3 more wars and both sides did not move an inch from where they were...
- Unfortunately given a choice would not hesitate to have another go at each other...
For what??? Plebiscite??? No way my friend..It can't be anything than mere ego...Anyways it do not matter why it did not happen...the fact is it will not happen...Neither Pak will move its forces from *** neither india will go for plebiscite...In today's context it means nothing...It better to convert the LOC to a border with more autonomy to Kashmir...and stop the madness...
Pity we can easily convert this centuary to South Asian centuay but we are stuck in a 62 year old conflict of plebiscite...