The only "rights" we want are the ones promised to us by the UN.
As I said its your call, the UN does not seem to care , again its your call , frankly we don't care.
So can you as a non kashmir resident buy land in kashmir...?
A kashmiri on either side of the LOC can buy land in india and pakistan but non kashmiri can not buy land on either side of the border in kashmir.
A stupid rule and an archaic one, I dont give horse crap as to what Nehru and his foolish policy has to say maybe you would have been happy if we changed the demographics of the region like the way Chinese do to Tibet.
Anyways I dont plan to buy land in Kashmir , too far away from home but I can visit srinagar, go for trekking or mountain climbing in ladhak and I dont need your permission do I?
Well we had over a half a million indians tied down for over a decade and made you spend billions.....
Its a huge tract of land with lots of water flowing and we dont mind spending millions or keeping a million men on standby , we have the money, the resource . Its my tax money and I am happy to spend it.
Before thumping your chest those good men and billions spent are in response to Pakistani millitary threat of invasion so dont dream that your Jihad has achieved it. Lets see where your jihad heads the moment support from Pakistan ceases.
.you should thank osama/bush that the 9/11 took place and the influx of afghan/arab/punjabi veterans of the afghan war did not flood into kashmir.
Even befor 9/11 Kashmir confilt was what I would term "low intensity" one when compared to major international struggles, so it would have not made difference.
Also India has upped its ante aginst the insurgency starting from fencing the border to actively engaging the millitants and their support infrastructure so 9/11 would not have made mush of a differnce.
We had a decade of conflict and and then the peace process under mushy that has led to nothing but backtracking from the indians.
Nope a lots of Indians are happy so are a lot of Pakistanis , why should we die for your cause which is dead anyways.
Between 15/20 years of conflict with actual military struggle in its proper sense over a 10 years period.
How long did it take the vietnamese,chinese ect to win there war against occupation forces..?
We have not even reached half way yet compared to the above.
Yes true , they were willing to fight and fought their own war , they rose up to the ocassion and fought for it not sacrificing other country men for their cause. Again and again I repeat , the conflict in Kashmir is not even close to the likes of major regional conflicts elsewhere so comparing with them is a moot point when you are lazy to fight in the first place .
Becauce where brothers and one nation......pakistan can only be complete once kashmir is part of the pakistan federation.
Hmmmm, whatever , let Pakistan do whatever it wants with AJK who cares whether it is complete or incomplete. Maybe you should say this to Pakistani establishment who sadly dont share your view.
I think the major break came during the Parliment attack which resulted in India mobilizing its troops for a full fledged war, something whaich Pakistan tried to avoid( and never expected) but keep India engaging through insurgency ,but after operation Parakram saner minds there realised that a full blown conflict is simply not worth it especially in this nuclear age.
Choice.......i also have the choice to fight for my freedom.
Yup fight for it , I dont think you shall be quiet successfull , history supports me , anyways all the best to ya.
The thing that prevented the palestinians from having hamas since the invasion of israel is the same reason kashmir did not have a hamas like organisation over the same period.
The kashmir freedom struggle was drawn down to see if the peace process could work and also the 9/11 attacks was not a good time to be backing military movements.....things have changed.
Only wishes , eat this Pakistan has realised that they will not simply keep fighting for your cost , their cost benifit analysis does not allow them also they have several problems in their backyard . Thy have realised that it is best to maintain status quo and live with peace. It s a winwin situation for both Pakistan and India , we get to keep IK, Pakistan gets to keep AJK plus we can divert our resources to other fruitful things and ordinary Kashmiris can study , eat and sleep happily.
How wrong you are....it just started to get going before the 9/11 attacks and then the "peace process" kicked in
Dont blame 9/11 for your failure , insurgency was at its peak agood decade ago and all you mentioned happened before but failed to achieve nothing.
You have had your chance to be fair and reach some sort of an accord with the pak govt.....mushy offered you almost everything including putting the UN resolution to one side......india did move inch.
Nope completely wrong, we have moved from claiming AJK to recognizing LOC as border.
t shows to all of us that the only way to get kashmir is through a military struggle.
Whatever bring em on I say.