Hulk
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2009
- Messages
- 7,582
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
This guy is very impressive. Forgot about topic but I like the depth he had.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are already there ie where they belong to ....Kashmir
These bozos want to be with a country whose flag they don't know how to hoist properly.
The flag is upside down.
And i think Kasmiri flag is opposite of Pakistani flag. They couldnt be hoisting it upside down in every pic. Nobody is that dumb! This way they could signify their importance towards Pakistan while maintaing a clear "independence" tone and not sending any false signals of acceding to Pakistan.
And i think Kasmiri flag is opposite of Pakistani flag. They couldnt be hoisting it upside down in every pic. Nobody is that dumb! This way they could signify their importance towards Pakistan while maintaing a clear "independence" tone and not sending any false signals of acceding to Pakistan.
It is a Pakistani flag yaar. For God's sake.
The message is very clear I guess.
Well if its a Pakistani flag and they are hoisting it upside down then that a gesture of extreme disrespect. I dont think they could be making the same mistake at every event.
This just shows how much paid guys are there in the protest. The real Kashmiris protesters only want independence and not to be sided with PAK.Ok next time when they hoist Pak flag in the rain of bullets and tear gas shells they would surely rectify their "mistake".
Well if its a Pakistani flag and they are hoisting it upside down then that a gesture of extreme disrespect. I dont think they could be making the same mistake at every event.
Distress - denoted by flying the Pakistan flag upside-down
A mod has already warned us to stick to the topic and I dont think an elaborate discussion on Junagadh is relevant to the topic. However since you asked, here goes.So just because the IoA was not in their favour it was fair to invade and hold a plesbestite?? So we come back to the policy of "what ever is mine is mine but whatever is yours is also mine". Why did indian forces invade Junagarth first place when IoA was already signed?? Wasnt that a breach??
[ ]
In plain words..
IoA in case of Kashmir in favour of India = accecptable
IoA in case of Junagarth in favour of Pakistan = nonaccecptable, invade and hold a plesbestite.
To make that demand you have to first accept that Kashmir had acceded to India. Unfortunately your country doesnt accept that. Something (IoA) that is not accepted at all, cant be reversed.So we also demand that accession of Kashmir was not in good faith and be reversed!
No can do. A lot of things have happened since Junagadh all of which have made Junagadh redundant. India had voluntarily proposed a plebiscite in all three states Kashmir, Junagadh and Hyderabad under UN supervision. It was rejected by Jinnah, no less. Later at the UN India had agreed to plebiscite on the condition that Pakistan must vacate Kashmir. The condition remains unfulfilled.So again going by your logic the people of Kashmir wish to join Pakistan or independence hence there should be a plesbestite too under UN Supervision since the demographics are significantly different than Junagarth.
No, its not a fair play. Pakistan questions the legal validity of IoA itself, on grounds of fraud and coercion. (Jinnah got a rebuke from Mountbatten for this) This means that accession of Kashmir is null and void as far as Pakistan is concerned. On the other hand India didnt question the legal validity of IoA executed by the Nawab of Junagadh. India questioned the wisdom of such accession in clear breach of the principles governing the accession of Princely States.Pakistan questions the validity of Kashmir IoA in same sense Indians questioned the validity of Junagarth IoA. Its a fair play.