What's new

Kashmir Issue : Our options & possible Course of Action

pahlay khalistan azaad karvaya Jayega phir Assam Nagaland &Chattisgarh
even if there is only 1% truth in this than I from top of my lungs want to raise the slogan

Zindha hai Bhutoo Zindha hai ......
 
  1. Mushraf destroyed Pakistan and Kashmir Movement
  2. Zardari burned Kasmir with his own hands
  3. NS kutta buried Kasmir and Pakistan , this mofo invited moodi in his granddaughter weeding And refused to meet Kashmiri Leadership when he visited india.
If we accept LOC as IB then this will happen:
  1. india will build dams and stop water.
  2. india will destabilize AJK and eventually will take it .
  3. india and friends will destroy Pakistan's economy .. whatever we have now we will not going to have it in 2030.
  4. india will commit genocide of Kashmiris , and if we did not help Kashmiris they will going to start heating Us.
  5. etc , etc etc.
Options For Pakistan .

  1. If we start insurgency in Kashmir and in other parts of india , it wont be helpful now , first we don't have any setup left(Indians and USA knows that , thanks to Mushi , Zardari and NS) , 2nd we are already too late , don't have enough time and 3rd even if we manage it this insurgency will lead us to WAR.
  2. Start the war right Now …… Yes this is the only option we have now , Instead of loosing our honour and die with thrust and hunger we better start war with india right now , if we stand for our self and our honour only then world will stand for us … Dear brothers and sisters , imagine 2030 and Pakistan without Kashmir ,, better we start war now with whatever we have .. Allah Will Help Us.. Better we die now with honour and dignity instead of dying in 2030 in civil war ..
I will again quote Fawad Choduray here : Jung jeet ya haar kay liye nahi "Waqar" kay liye lari gati hai. ….. And our honour and our Faith is on stake right now.. It is now or never ..





 
Wont be no ethnic cleansing, just economic migrants and industry into Kashmir. They migrant to Kerala, etc. for example as well. However, you are right if you want to say it's going to integrate Kashmir into India much more, sure. It's not going to be as dramatic as people make it out to be.




Yes, yes, nukes everywhere.
What is the difference with Usraeli settlements in Palestine? the same demographic change, and creating a fait accompli.. against UN resolutions..

And yes nukes in many other places than Pakistan..
 
GoP needs to ban
1. Airspace for Indian Airlines
2. Trade corridor to Afghan through Wagah
 
not only of Kashmir but indian occupation of junaghar and haiderabad is illegal too . we did a big mistake in our history by accepting indian occupation
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simla_Agreement

It is time for Pakistan to formally declare that the terms of Bilateral engagement for Kashmir are over as India has moved unilaterally to change the status quo in Kashmir, which is in violation of the treaty.

This will stop all this noise about Kashmir being a bilateral issue under Simla Agreement, as that agreement is finished. FORMALLY Finished. This has to be a formal declaration with the rationale for its dissolution articulated so that it cannot be used as a political tool by any third country.

An agreement can only exist if both parties continue to respect the terms of the treaty.

The next time anyone says, you must discuss this bilaterally, then Pakistan can say, we announced the termination of the Simla Agreement, and therefore there are NO BILATERAL mechanisms in place to discuss Kashmir with India.
 
you do realise that after that India will have no reason to keep IWT alive?

India has already terminated the Simla through its actions. The other party to the treaty, Pakistan also needs to do the same.

If India withdraws from IWT, then its "word, and commitment" to treaty will fall further down the shit hole that is India's reputation....
 
India has terminated the Simla through its action. The other party to the treaty, Pakistan also needs to do the same.

If India withdraws from IWT, then its "word, and commitment" to treaty will fall further down the shit hole that is India's reputation....
yeah because India won't use its biggest weapon against pakistan because of word and commitment when warlike situations are developing.
India is holding more and the biggest card here.

War is coming and all dams will be targeted if desired.
Most badly hit will be your own territory in that case....:/
Indian population is very sparse near the dams whereas rivers literally flow down to the Pak area of valley which are inhabited by civilians...
 
There is no need for any such declaration, though Simla Agreement has since long lost its value and relevance.
 
yeah because India won't use its biggest weapon against pakistan because of word and commitment when warlike situations are developing.
India is holding more and the biggest card here.


Most badly hit will be your own territory in that case....:/
Indian population is very sparse near the dams whereas rivers literally flow down to the Pak area of valley which are inhabited by civilians...

Flooding is fine, you've used this type of attack before already anyways.

We'll take out the dams in Ladakh on Indus first. Then the others as and when required.

Plus it will take you years to repaid or rebuild. A one time flood for many years of supply will do us just fine.
 

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom