kaykay
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 8,933
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
if kashmir should have been indias then hydrabad deccan should have been pakistans
sure but if you can take it...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if kashmir should have been indias then hydrabad deccan should have been pakistans
princely state of Kashmir is Indias property legally given to India by maharaja of Kashmir. Pakistan should return occupied territory to India.
also Lahore and Karachi were non Muslim majority at the time of partition, and close to Indian mainland (either by land or sea connection). Pakistan should give back Karachi and Lahore to India.
also 1/3rd of Muslims stayed back in India, so Pakistan should give back its additional 1/3rd land to India.
also thar was Hindu majority and continous with India by land and culture. the part of thar in possession of Pakistan also belong to India.
It is not the question of what should have happened, but the question of what has happened. If anybody is illegal occupying that is India.
Peace between India and Pakistan is not possible unless India handover IoK and Jammu. India has two choice either handover IoK and Jammu thereby enjoy friendly relation with Pakistan and thereby prosperity and integration with Indian economy or keep on harping Kashmir and go into oblivion.
The ball is in India's court.
Sometime you claim Kashmir is for Kashmiri, sometimes claim opposite of it that Kashmir is disputed between India and Pakistan(while India officially never accept Kashmir as disputed) Why Pakistanis so confused about Kashmir. Kashmir joined India by accession but Kalat was annexed by Pakistan, so there is a difference.
Good Lord! Is Indian education system that bad?
Partition was based on Muslim majority provinces and KINGDOMS!
If you claim Kashmir because of the Maharaja, we will also claim Hyderabad because of the Sultan. Simple as that.
Here changed it for you bud. You need a editor.
We give up Kalat, you also give up Hyderabad & Kashmir. Deal?
Good Lord! Is Indian education system that bad?
Partition was based on Muslim majority provinces and KINGDOMS!
If you claim Kashmir because of the Maharaja, we will also claim Hyderabad because of the Sultan. Simple as that.
Here changed it for you bud. You need a editor.
We give up Kalat, you also give up Hyderabad, Kashmir and Goa, and lower Bhutan. Deal?
if kashmir should have been indias then hydrabad deccan should have been pakistans
Pakistan was the frontrunner to show greed for Hindu majority areas like Junagarh and Hyderabad and now guys are crying foul after losing Junagarh, Kashmir and Hyderabad.
Good Lord! Is Indian education system that bad?
Partition was based on Muslim majority provinces and KINGDOMS!
If you claim Kashmir because of the Maharaja, we will also claim Hyderabad because of the Sultan. Simple as that.
Here changed it for you bud. You need a editor.
We give up Kalat, you also give up Hyderabad, Kashmir and Goa, and lower Bhutan. Deal?
There can't be a one way deal.
If Pakistan is illegally occupying Kashmir because of the Maharaja, then India must also hand over to Pakistan the lost occupied territories of Hyderabad, Junagrh, and West Bengal (which was Muslim majority pre-1947).
There can't be a one way deal.
If Pakistan is illegally occupying Kashmir because of the Maharaja, then India must also hand over to Pakistan the lost occupied territories of Hyderabad, Junagrh, and West Bengal (which was Muslim majority pre-1947).
Here you go. You are wrong about the sultan of hyderabad. He wanted a independent nation of his own. The Razakars were actually pro-pakistanis. The sulatan himself acceded to India and after that troops were sent into Hyderabad and it was free of Razakars in just four day.
by that logic, whole India was non-muslim majority so Pakistan should give back whole of Pakistan to India and go back to whereever they think they come from.
too late for deal, you should not have attacked kashmir in first place. Anyway, you got 1/3 kashmir. Try to run it properly.There can't be a one way deal.
If Pakistan is illegally occupying Kashmir because of the Maharaja, then India must also hand over to Pakistan the lost occupied territories of Hyderabad, Junagrh, and West Bengal (which was Muslim majority pre-1947).