AZADPAKISTAN2009
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 37,669
- Reaction score
- 68
- Country
- Location
Canada should ban migrants from India as they import , religious intolerance to Canada
Kashmir; Aggressive diplomacy begining to have its effects
- Thread starter Shane
- Start date
war&peace
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2015
- Messages
- 33,771
- Reaction score
- 18
- Country
- Location
It looks like the story is for today.. the facts and situation is even worse so what's the difference?
Shane
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,459
- Reaction score
- 56
- Country
- Location
You are right, changed the title post. It was a tweet by Lord Nazir that implied as if it happened now.
Ali Tariq
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2017
- Messages
- 2,749
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
Mutakalim
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2014
- Messages
- 1,975
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Aryan0395
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2018
- Messages
- 1,134
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Im sure Pak members believe Indians must be reacting along these lines 'OMG how dare he suggest 'bilateral solution' for Kashmir?'
But, India itself is saying all talks on kashmir will be only with Pakistan and there is no room for third party.
How is this aggressive diplomacy by Pakistan?
kuh bhi?
But, India itself is saying all talks on kashmir will be only with Pakistan and there is no room for third party.
How is this aggressive diplomacy by Pakistan?
kuh bhi?
KeyBORED Warrior
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2019
- Messages
- 762
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Ioj&k could become endia's Bangladesh71 if we play our cards well. We shall never get this opportunity ever again. Its now or never.
Im sure Pak members believe Indians must be reacting along these lines 'OMG how dare he suggest 'bilateral solution' for Kashmir?'
But, India itself is saying all talks on kashmir will be only with Pakistan and there is no room for third party.
How is this aggressive diplomacy by Pakistan?
kuh bhi?
1. Issue is being internationalized.
2. Reap image of India is being shown.
3. Pressurizing India to get into the talks, because even though India is barking "bilateral, bilateral," they end up saying it's an internal matter and do not wish to negotiate. So bilateral or trilateral or infi-lateral, the point is to get India to talk and expose it's actions in Kashmir.
Shane
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,459
- Reaction score
- 56
- Country
- Location
US lawmakers urge India to end occupation of Kashmir
WASHINGTON: The voice of the Kashmiri people, who have been living under siege since Aug 5 when India forcibly merged their land with the union, is now resonating in the US Congress where key lawmakers are urging New Delhi to end the occupation and allow its residents to speak.
Congressman Adam Smith, Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, called India’s US ambassador on Tuesday and told him that he was “continuing to monitor the situation regarding the government of India’s decision to revoke the special status” of occupied Jammu and Kashmir.
“There are legitimate concerns about the ongoing communications blackouts, increased militarisation of the region, and enforcement of curfews,” he told the Indian envoy. Mr Smith, a Democrat from Washington state, said some of his constituents were from occupied Jammu and Kashmir and had also visited the area after Aug 5.
“They saw a region under siege with its residents isolated, without an ability to communicate at all outside of the region,” he said.
Mr Smith reminded India that “recognition for the potential disparate impact of this decision on the region’s Muslim population and other minority groups — now and in the future – is imperative”.
Congresswoman Yvette says Modi has no right to do what he is doing to the residents of Valley
Senator Bob Menendez, a ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Congressman Eliot L. Engel, Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, issued a joint statement “in response to the steps India has taken to revise the status of Jammu and Kashmir”.
The two lawmakers reminded New Delhi that “as the world’s largest democracy, India has an opportunity to demonstrate for all its citizens the importance of protecting and promoting equal rights, including freedom of assembly, access to information and equal protections under the law”.
The US legislators reminded the Indian government that “transparency and political participation” were “the cornerstones of representative democracies. And “we hope the Indian government will abide by these principles in Jammu and Kashmir,” they added.
They also urged Pakistan to “refrain from any retaliatory aggression — including support for infiltrations across the Line of Control — and take demonstrable action against the terrorist infrastructure on Pakistan’s soil”.
Congresswoman Yvette Clarke of New York, said she was “extremely concerned” and was raising her voice about what’s happening in Kashmir now.
“Prime Minister (Narendra) Modi has no right to do what he is doing to the people of Kashmir. And it is up to us to raise our voices for justice, to raise our voices for self-governance and for no discrimination based on religion,” she said. “Prime Minister Modi should know better. We all must raise our voices.”
She said when she returns to Washington in September, “this will be an issue front and centre for the US Congress to deal with and we are going to deal with it forthright”.
Congressman Smith said that those of his constituents who visited Kashmir after Aug 5 told him that during their stay there they were “afraid for their own lives, and terrified for the safety of their family members” who remain in the region.
“The Indian government must take steps to reduce these fears and offer greater transparency for the world to see what is happening there,” he said.
Congressman Smith urged India to demonstrate “a commitment to the protection of basic human rights and equal rights”, reminding the policy makers in New Delhi that their “policy decision exacerbates an already tense environment” in the region.
“I encourage both India and Pakistan to keep lines of communication open to prevent the further deterioration of the situation, and exercise restraint instead of engaging in rhetoric and actions that inspire extremist ideology,” he said.
The Forbes magazine, while commenting on these statements, observed that instead of showing leniency, India had done the opposite.
“Treating Kashmiris worse than anyone else in India — including freedom of assembly, access to information and equal protections under the law,” it wrote.
“India did not consult the Kashmiri Assembly before taking Kashmir’s autonomy. It gave no opportunity whatsoever for Kashmiris to politically participate,” Forbes added. “Not only did it take away, unconstitutionally, Kashmir’s right to consultation on legal measures, it downgraded Kashmir from a state to a federal territory.”
WASHINGTON: The voice of the Kashmiri people, who have been living under siege since Aug 5 when India forcibly merged their land with the union, is now resonating in the US Congress where key lawmakers are urging New Delhi to end the occupation and allow its residents to speak.
Congressman Adam Smith, Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, called India’s US ambassador on Tuesday and told him that he was “continuing to monitor the situation regarding the government of India’s decision to revoke the special status” of occupied Jammu and Kashmir.
“There are legitimate concerns about the ongoing communications blackouts, increased militarisation of the region, and enforcement of curfews,” he told the Indian envoy. Mr Smith, a Democrat from Washington state, said some of his constituents were from occupied Jammu and Kashmir and had also visited the area after Aug 5.
“They saw a region under siege with its residents isolated, without an ability to communicate at all outside of the region,” he said.
Mr Smith reminded India that “recognition for the potential disparate impact of this decision on the region’s Muslim population and other minority groups — now and in the future – is imperative”.
Congresswoman Yvette says Modi has no right to do what he is doing to the residents of Valley
Senator Bob Menendez, a ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Congressman Eliot L. Engel, Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, issued a joint statement “in response to the steps India has taken to revise the status of Jammu and Kashmir”.
The two lawmakers reminded New Delhi that “as the world’s largest democracy, India has an opportunity to demonstrate for all its citizens the importance of protecting and promoting equal rights, including freedom of assembly, access to information and equal protections under the law”.
The US legislators reminded the Indian government that “transparency and political participation” were “the cornerstones of representative democracies. And “we hope the Indian government will abide by these principles in Jammu and Kashmir,” they added.
They also urged Pakistan to “refrain from any retaliatory aggression — including support for infiltrations across the Line of Control — and take demonstrable action against the terrorist infrastructure on Pakistan’s soil”.
Congresswoman Yvette Clarke of New York, said she was “extremely concerned” and was raising her voice about what’s happening in Kashmir now.
“Prime Minister (Narendra) Modi has no right to do what he is doing to the people of Kashmir. And it is up to us to raise our voices for justice, to raise our voices for self-governance and for no discrimination based on religion,” she said. “Prime Minister Modi should know better. We all must raise our voices.”
She said when she returns to Washington in September, “this will be an issue front and centre for the US Congress to deal with and we are going to deal with it forthright”.
Congressman Smith said that those of his constituents who visited Kashmir after Aug 5 told him that during their stay there they were “afraid for their own lives, and terrified for the safety of their family members” who remain in the region.
“The Indian government must take steps to reduce these fears and offer greater transparency for the world to see what is happening there,” he said.
Congressman Smith urged India to demonstrate “a commitment to the protection of basic human rights and equal rights”, reminding the policy makers in New Delhi that their “policy decision exacerbates an already tense environment” in the region.
“I encourage both India and Pakistan to keep lines of communication open to prevent the further deterioration of the situation, and exercise restraint instead of engaging in rhetoric and actions that inspire extremist ideology,” he said.
The Forbes magazine, while commenting on these statements, observed that instead of showing leniency, India had done the opposite.
“Treating Kashmiris worse than anyone else in India — including freedom of assembly, access to information and equal protections under the law,” it wrote.
“India did not consult the Kashmiri Assembly before taking Kashmir’s autonomy. It gave no opportunity whatsoever for Kashmiris to politically participate,” Forbes added. “Not only did it take away, unconstitutionally, Kashmir’s right to consultation on legal measures, it downgraded Kashmir from a state to a federal territory.”
Shane
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,459
- Reaction score
- 56
- Country
- Location
So says the recently Atoot Ang claiming, Internal Matter of India claiming and now Kashmiri Women Fetish holder pervert Indian SanghiIm sure Pak members believe Indians must be reacting along these lines 'OMG how dare he suggest 'bilateral solution' for Kashmir?'
But, India itself is saying all talks on kashmir will be only with Pakistan and there is no room for third party.
How is this aggressive diplomacy by Pakistan?
kuh bhi?
.
Shane
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,459
- Reaction score
- 56
- Country
- Location
Here is why my self imposed ignorance infected RSS Sanghi:
Kashmir at the UNSC after 50 years
- The Kashmiri people must be made a party
India, disregarding what Secretary General said and ignoring all norms of international law and the United Nations Security Council resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir abrogated Articles 370 and 35A of the Indian constitution and thereby bringing a constitutional end to the special status of the State.
We believe that abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A is an act of aggression and assault on the rights of the people of the State. Such attempts are in open contravention of UN resolution 122 adopted on 24 January 1957; 123 adopted on 21 February 1957 and 126 adopted on December 2, 1957. These resolutions prohibit any unilateral action to change the disputed nature of the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
It is to be noted that the UNSC Resolution 122 “declares that the convening of a constituent assembly as recommended by the General council of the ‘All Jammu and Kashmir National Conference’ and any action that assembly may have taken or might attempt to take to determine the future shape and affiliation of the entire State or any part thereof, or any action by the parties concerned in support of any such action by the assembly, would not constitute a disposition of the State in accordance with the above principle.”
Here is just one other reason that irked Modi and forced him to complain to his sugar daddy Trump about Imran labelling him Hitler, a name that resonates with Butcher of Gujrat around the world now, Hitler Modi...
Thats just one other reason why my self imposed ignorance infected RSS Sanghi, your own media tries to sugar coat Dehati Aurat Modi's usual rona dhona to Trump but it is so obvious still:
Thursday, Aug 22, 2019 | Last Update : 11:04 PM IST
India, All India
PM Modi talks to Trump, raises Imran’s ‘extreme rhetoric’
THE ASIAN AGE. | SRIDHAR KUMARASWAMI
Published : Aug 20, 2019, 2:04 am IST
Updated : Aug 20, 2019, 2:04 am IST
The Prime Minister recalled their meeting in Osaka on the margins of the G-20 summit in end-June earlier this year.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi
New Delhi:" In an interesting development, Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke to US President Donald Trump for half an hour on Monday evening, during which Mr Modi, in an obvious reference to Pakistan PM Imran Khan’s recent antics, told President Trump that “extreme rhetoric and incitement to anti-India violence by certain leaders in the region was not conducive to peace”. This marks the first top-level exchange between the two leaders since India bifurcated its state of J&K and revoked Article 370 earlier this month."
It may be recalled that Pakistan PM Imran Khan is engaging in diplomatic offensive against India, including a consistant assault on twitter and his talks comparing India to Nazi Germany.
Similar threads
