Kargil Conflict 1999 - Indian Casualties

[Mujahid]

Some of the casualties of Indian Army during Kargil conflict in 1999

 

[hkdas]

Some of the casualties of Indian Army during Kargil conflict in 1999

u must watch that video before giving that title....
in that video it says Rajputana Rifles's causality during kargil war is 130... the battalion is normally 800 men there are 27 battalions deployed in kargil war against the mujaheddin (actually is was Pakistan army)

it is just a Pakistani fan-boy work.. no point in this thread......

 

[guru1]

Over 4,000 Pakistanis died in Kargil conflict: Nawaz Sharief ( India, Pakistan)

 

[Windjammer]

Over 4,000 Pakistanis died in Kargil conflict: Nawaz Sharief ( India, Pakistan)

Yea same Nawaz Sharif who said he was totally unaware of the operation yet he knows the causality figures.

 

[madooxno9]

Yea same Nawaz Sharif who said he was totally unaware of the operation yet he knows the causality figures.

Was not this same guy rushed to Amrika to save Pak fauj's cum mujhid sorry as* . And you think you know more than this guy

 

[GORKHALI]

Yea same Nawaz Sharif who said he was totally unaware of the operation yet he knows the causality figures.

Actually 1/3rd of NLIF wiped out,thanks to heavy artillery barrage and concentrated rocket attack.Not to mention icing on cake .LGB hitting bunkers and deports.

 

[Windjammer]

Was not this same guy rushed to Amrika to save Pak fauj's cum mujhid sorry as* . And you think you know more than this guy

Actually, he most probably ended up saving shining India from further humiliation of the Kargil coffin scandal but in the process got his own a$$ kicked out of the office.

 

[GORKHALI]

Actually, he most probably ended up saving shining India from further humiliation of the Kargil coffin scandal but in the process got his own a$$ kicked out of the office.

But we are talking about casualty,Isn't you guys released martyr list on official website after 11 long year to save humiliation of defeat.Suck this:
Pakistan Army admits to Kargil martyrs | NDTV.com

 

[Joe Shearer]

If a Pakistani says that they lost Kargil, he must not be a Pakistani, or he must be a politician, a bloody civilian, or he must be lying for some purpose or the other.

If a Pakistani says that Pakistan actually won the war, he must be a Pakistani not resident in Pakistan, or he must be connected to the military, or he must be a fan-boy on PDF, acting smart so that he can have a few moments of victory to gloat over

Go ahead, gloat.

Meanwhile, I'll be sticking to gloating over the picture in my avatar.

 

[COLDHEARTED AVIATOR]

te="Windjammer, posis : 5702983, member: 21078"]Yea same Nawaz Sharif who said he was totally unaware of the operation yet he knows the causality figures. [/quote]
LOl..what fcking logic is that..haha

Not knowing about the pre operation planning means that he wont have any information post execution?

 

[genmirajborgza786]

Some of the casualties of Indian Army during Kargil conflict in 1999

wars are not won or lost through casualties but "objectives"

the kargil operation just doesn't makes any sense, the success & failure of a military operation is all about achieving its objectives & NOT the casualty rates of the opponent. Soviet Union lost more men then Germany' in the battle of Stalingrad, but nonetheless won the war, because even though Germany lost less men then the Soviets, but it failed to achieve its objectives & even though the Soviets lost more men then Germany but it achieved its "objectives" nonetheless. & militarily the kargil operation failed to achieve its objectives, & it was a blunder through & through. Nawaz Sharif with all his ills cannot be expected to agree to such a foolish plan like the kargil operations & axe his own foot, not only did Benazir but even gen. Zia-ul haq had rejected it !, from all angle this operation was initiated by a few general's with the sole objective to create a perfect pretext for a coup d'état

 

[nair]

wars are not won or lost through casualties but "objectives"

the kargil operation just doesn't makes any sense, the success & failure of a military operation is all about achieving its objectives & NOT the casualty rates of the opponent. Soviet Union lost more men then Germany' in the battle of Stalingrad, but none the less won the war, because even though Germany lost less men then the Soviets, but none the less it failed to achieve its objectives & even though the Soviets lost more men then Germany but it achieved its "objectives" nonetheless. & militarily the kargil operation failed to achieve its objectives, & it was a blunder through & through. Nawaz Sharif with all his ills cannot be expected to agree to such a foolish plan like the kargil operations & axe his own foot, not only did Benazir but even gen. Zia-ul haq had rejected it !, from all angle this operation was initiated by a few general's with the sole objective to create a perfect pretext for a coup d'état

I have tried telling this several times, but then what i do is congratulate them on their "victory"

 

[Windjammer]

But we are talking about casualty,Isn't you guys released martyr list on official website after 11 long year to save humiliation of defeat.Suck this:
Pakistan Army admits to Kargil martyrs | NDTV.com

I ask myself, is there any point in replying to a nonsensical rant, since you are chocking on it, answer me as where did i deny the casualties, wonder if you have the comprehension to differentiate between the admitted figure of 453 and the ridiculous claims of over 4000. ???....in a conflict casualties are bound to occur however it's another matter that India lost close to a thousand soldiers during the 2002 stand off without a bullet being fired.
Since you are blabbering about the figures go and find out how many did India lose and if you can't then come back, i'll shove it down your throat.

 

[GORKHALI]

I ask myself, is there any point in replying to a nonsensical rant, since you are chocking on it, answer me as where did i deny the casualties, wonder if you have the comprehension to differentiate between the admitted figure of 453 and the ridiculous claims of over 4000. ???....in a conflict casualties are bound to occur however it's another matter that India lost close to a thousand soldiers during the 2002 stand off without a bullet being fired.
Since you are blabbering about the figures go and find out how many did India lose and if you can't then come back, i'll shove it down your throat.

453 after 11 years to save their face and that tucked into other martyr list ,not to mentioned how many irregulars killed in this kargil. An estimated 4000 killed in action released in many white papers on war,go search for them. While in 2002, 1500 killed in mine laying operation.Everything is their in Army website as they are answerable to citizens of this country,can you say this for Pakistan? where the state-controlled media in West Pakistan had been projecting imaginary victories in 1971.

 

[Windjammer]

453 after 11 years to save their face and that tucked into other martyr list ,not to mentioned how many irregulars killed in this kargil. An estimated 4000 killed in action released in many white papers on war,go search for them. While in 2002, 1500 killed in mine laying operation.Everything is their in Army website as they are answerable to citizens of this country,can you say this for Pakistan? where the state-controlled media in West Pakistan had been projecting imaginary victories in 1971.

We can run in circles all day long, claiming, denying, disputing, just ask yourself, since all the conflict took place on the Indian side, hence most if not all the casualties must have also occurred there.....at the end of the conflict, how many bodies did India discover and remember you are claiming over 4000 Pakistani casualties, surely you don't think or believe that Pakistani soldiers were able to retrieve and take back several thousands of their dead when they pulled back...... unless off course if you live in a fools paradise.