Things are not that simple.
We have no first amendment in India where the difference between speech and physical violence is clearly demarcated.The first amendment is not about demarcating between speech and violence. It is about separation of church and state. "Congress shall make no law..."
In India the freedom of speech comes with reasonable clauses and not in an absolute way.I made it clear that it was my personal opinion of how things should be.
But I figure that applies to well meaning criticism based on facts and that points out the social evils..For example attacking the caste system wont be considered as a criticism of Hinduism..Not today, no. But a long time back, people who attacked the caste system WERE construed as attacking Hinduism, and violently dealt with. Now that such people have managed to change people's thinking, now everybody agrees that it is OK to do so. So you see, instead of some people deciding what is "well meaning criticism", and what is not, all criticism should be free. 200 years back, your example would not have been considered well meaning, even if it was. That's why freedom of speech should be absolute. Think about it.but a fringe groups standing near a temple shouting "y'all pagans gonna end up in hell, y'all practise a demonic, satanic cult" and propagating hate literature to the same extent cannot be equated with freedom of speech in India. In that case the line between words and actions get very blurred.As I said, I was stating my personal opinion. I know that somebody who does that can be arrested in India.
Moreover India has its own fragile social conditions and balance that is being upset by the rampant conversions and these are knee-jerk reactions to the same. As I said, unless we are willing to treat the root cause, there is no point trying to treat the symptoms only.If they had a legitimate grievance, they should have taken it to court. If they attack people physically, they are committing a crime. They will be arrested. And that's not just my personal opinion, that is the law.
Responses in blue.