Justice Isa’s wife seeks income tax details of PM, others

[Chakar The Great]

As a citizen of Pakistan, she has the right to ask for money trail of public figures. Let the court decide.

 

[alibaz]

As a citizen of Pakistan, she has the right to ask for money trail of public figures. Let the court decide.

Agreed, but before doing that she must give her money trail case since her husband is dispensing justice in the top most court of the country. Failing to justify herself point fingers towards her husband who is first in the line for assuming chair of CJP.

 

[Zibago]

I would suggest you to watch Ahmad Norani’s latest interview on MJTV in which he clearly mentioned asset details of his sons and wife and also their company names. Now you will say that’s his wife and sons business, it got nothing to do with him. Same goes for this Judge her wife is facing court kacheyri, coz her husband is goverment servant. As per law, General is liable to declare assets of his and wife but not kids. It’s astonishing to see the size of his business empire.
Aside from that, if you believe his Toyota is worth 3 Mil PKR, which he declared himself then you need to look in the mirror before using word “retard”. Have a good day.

Mjtv and Ahmad Norani

 

[volatile]

The proven facts are Right of privacy of data for an individual and this information cant be just given to any Tom ,Dick and Herry .Now when ARU (Which credibility and legitimacy it self is under doubt starts asking people asset details then this is a right of people to ask for the same as well


The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan enshrines the right to privacy as a fundamental right. Article 14(1) of the Constitution confirms that "[t]he dignity of man and, subject to law, the privacy of home, shall be inviolable."

As a fundamental constitutional right, the right to privacy is meant to take precedence over any other inconsistent provisions of domestic law. Article 8 of the Constitution provides that "[a]ny law, or any custom or usage having the force of law, in so far as it is inconsistent with the rights conferred [under the Constitution], shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void." Article 8 (5), furthermore, states that "[t]he rights conferred by this Chapter shall not be suspended except as expressly provided by the Constitution."

Yet Pakistan's constitution also includes a wide-ranging exception to the primacy of fundamental rights. The provisions of Article 8 do not apply to any law relating to the 'proper discharge' of the duties of the Armed Forces or the police. The breadth of this exception is troubling, especially given the central role that the Armed Forces in particular have played in Pakistan's domestic political landscape historically.

State of Privacy Pakistan

Table of contents Introduction Right to Privacy Data Protection Identificatio

privacyinternational.org

So only way to get data is to done legally ,Was this done in this case?

 

[ADIL SHERDIL]

She can ask for it all day long. But the thing is she is under investigation and she need to show the source of her income. Somehow in Pakistan we can't question the one in power in any field. Judges are immune to any sort of investigation if u say anything its touheen adalat. If u question politicians then we are anti democracy. If we question mullahs then we are kafirs and yhoudi agents. If we question army then we are traitors.
Now justice Isa should ask her wife to stay quite until she is proven not guilty.

 

[macnurv]

Justice Isa’s wife seeks income tax details of PM, others
NASIR IQBAL

ISLAMABAD: Justice Qazi Faez Isa’s wife, Sarina Isa, on Saturday alleged that since her confidential and legally-protected income tax and bank records were illegally accessed, she also wanted similar information about those who were provided her details.
In a statement, Ms Isa stated that she wanted information about the people who accessed or were provided her confidential information and documents, especially Prime Minister Imran Khan, Law Minister Dr Farogh Nasim, Asset Recovery Unit Chairman Mirza Shahzad Akbar, Dr Mohammad Ashfaq Ahmed and complainant Abdul Waheed Dogar.
“They should not object because they have held or hold public office, while one of them, who is a government servant, complains that my family and I are not tax compliant,” she alleged in the statement.
The statement is annexed with her Aug 28 reply to the notices issued by commissioner (IR) FBR on Aug 21 under Section 122(9) and Section 111(1)(b) of the Income Tax Ordinance (ITO) 2001.
It stated that she was a private person who had never held public office or a position in government and had worked and paid a total of Rs809,970 and Rs576,540 as tax during the last two years.

Earlier, she issued two similar statements, explaining her position in response to notices issued by the board.
In her reply, she asked the FBR to furnish her income tax returns on which the authority was relying, adding that the board wanted her to reconstruct her life and explain every rupee earned by her since she started working in Karachi American School some 38 years ago.
Highlighting Section 174(3) of the ITO, she recalled that the ordinance did not require an individual to maintain any record for more than six years after the end of the tax year to which they relate.
She argued that she was under no legal obligation to keep providing information to the FBR, but still she did voluntarily.
“Without prejudice to all my constitutional and legal rights, I also do not want to give you a pretext to allege that I did not provide information,” she stated, adding that it had become painfully clear to her that the Federal Board of Revenue intended to pass an alleged unjustified and illegal order since it did not consider to be bound by law.
She alleged that the FBR claimed that she could not have earned and saved enough to justify her purchase of three properties in London — one for £236,000 in the year 2004 and two in 2013 for £245,000 and £270,000, respectively.
Referring to Section 116A of the ordinance which was inserted through the Finance Act 2018, when for the first time foreign income and asset statement was required to be filed, she complied with the new legal requirement and filed her returns and statements with regard to foreign income and assets for the tax year 2018 and again for tax year 2019.
But the FBR has not explained under which provision she was required to disclose the foreign income and assets before the stated amendment.
Likewise, the FBR disregarded her agriculture income by purportedly relying on Section 111 of the ITO and treating it as unexplained income.
The board intentionally disregarded the fact that the proviso to Section 111 of the ordinance accepted income derived from agriculture on which income tax paid under the relevant provincial law was added through the Finance Act 2013, the statement added.
Therefore, the agricultural income cannot be disregarded irrespective of whether the provincial income tax was paid or restricted to adjustment to the extent of such payment.
She said she owned about 278 acres of agricultural land which was run and managed by her late father, who passed away on June 25, 2020.
She said she continued to derive substantial income from her agricultural land, investing some amount in saving certificates issued by the government.

"Amphan": Strongest cyclone in Bay of Bengal raises virus fears

India and Bangladesh began evacuating more than two million people Monday as a cyclone barrelled towards their coasts, with officials racing

www.globalvillagespace.com

And how exactly that will help her prove her ill gotten wealth or should I say her husbands. In any other country other than Pakistan, this kind of excuse would be thrown out by the court and the idiot making this excuse will be told to shut up and focus on herself. But here in our great country, law is a joke because those who are supposed to uphold it are jokers.