Just in: India's Nirbhay cruise missile blasts off from Integrated Test Range, Odisha. Details await

[DESERT FIGHTER]

sorry unlike you I don't speak retard.

Yeah you speak shitinese.

Anyways the fact that Babur is nothing but an Ukrainian missile, is confirmed by this book published by Stanford University Press and authored by Stanford University partner think tank International Assessment and Strategy:

https://books.google.com/books?id=dccE7YOi-54C&pg=PA93&lpg=PA93&dq=ukraine+Pakistan+cruise+missile&source=bl&ots=0j8bd-lNpa&sig=m5MTDozzwlJ1MHple6FwlP-09Ro&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiL4L6q6YXRAhWM7CYKHfhzAugQ6AEIGTAD#v=onepage&q=ukraine Pakistan cruise missile&f=false

Read that shyt again...

An anonymous report from 2006 claiming China bought analogues of KH-55 .. And so did Pak and Iran in 2001... ?



Pak conducted first Babur test in early 2004.

 

[Mrc]

The second flight on October 17, 2014 was a big success. The missile travelled 1,010 km instead of the targeted 800 km.

Only in indian books this can b written as big huge mountainous success... its seems like missile over shot its target by 310 kms

 

[Hindustani78]

Only in indian books this can b written as big huge mountainous success... its seems like missile over shot its target by 310 kms

I think it was 334 kms as much as i remember .

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...ile-nirbhay/story-Zn795SrU1wqZgWIIOmlW5K.html

Nirbhay cruise missile. (PTI File Photo )

India on Wednesday conducted the flight test of indigenously-designed and developed long range subsonic cruise missile ‘Nirbhay’ from the Integrated Test Range (ITR) at Chandipur in Odisha but there were reports of the launch being a failure.

The sophisticated missile with a strike range of 1,000 km was test launched from a specially-designed launcher around noon from the launch complex-3 of the ITR near here, defence sources said.

Shortly after the launch, there were reports that the test had failed like most of the earlier launches.

Neither the defence ministry nor the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), which is the agency involved in the launch, were ready to comment on the development.

They also refused to react to reports that the launch was a failure.

Powered by a solid rocket motor booster, ‘Nirbhay’ missile with a turbo-fan engine is guided by a highly advanced inertial navigation system.

After the missile achieves designated altitude and velocity the booster motor is separated and the torfan engine automatically switches on taking over further propulsion, a Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) scientist associated with this project said.

He said that mid-way in its flight, missile’s wing opens up by the commands generated by the sophisticated on board computer for stabilising the flight path.

The missile was tracked with the help of ground based radars and it’s health parameters were monitored by indigenous telemetry stations by team of professionals from DRDO’s ITR and LRDE (Electronics & Radar Development Establishment).

The maiden test flight of Nirbhay held on March 12, 2013 had to be terminated mid way for safety reasons due to malfunction of a component, sources said.

However, the second launch on October 17, 2014 was successful.

The next trial conducted on October 16, 2015, had to be aborted after 700 seconds of its launch. All these trials were conducted from same defence base.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

They also refused to react to reports that the launch was a failure.

Interesting

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Pakistan nuclear program itself a stolen blueprint of European nuclear program.
Rest are painted Chinese tin can which might have been stolen from some other place for sure...
We already have very capable long range supersonic cruise missile in inventory..First counter that..
Sooner or later we will induct Nirbhay too..

Canadians want their stolen centrifuges back from India.

 

[Asgard]

Yeah you speak shitinese.




Read that shyt again...

An anonymous report from 2006 claiming China bought analogues of KH-55 .. And so did Pak and Iran in 2001... ?



Pak conducted first Babur test in early 2004.

lol, that was no anonymous report but by the International Assessment and Stategy Center(a thing tank allied to Stanford University).
Stanford University which is worth more than all of Pakistan's universities has published this book through it's publication wing.
The report makes it clear that the missiles were delivered from Ukraine by 2001 and thus it took a few years before Pakistan could get them from China.

Anyways even after 12 years after getting them from China, Pakistan still has to import even Baburs turbofan engine.

Canadians want their stolen centrifuges back from India.

Get BTFO:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...to-major-uranium-supply-deal/article23967494/

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Ministry of defence report did confirm anything, all it said was a ship launched system which it was reffering to as developing of [one] ship-borne system with [one] Land Attack Missile and [one] Anti ship Missile, which was clearly C-602 which Pakistan was able to buy after years of pleading.

Dumbass you don't develop an imported weapon.. C series are already operational with Pak navy .. You too retarded to know that.

C-602s have been in service since 2011... Second batch came in 2014;

https://www.google.com.pk/amp/s/www...tan-navy-deploys-chinese-c-602-cruise-missile

Continue your chewtiyapa

 

[Asgard]

Dumbass you don't develop an imported weapon.. C series are already operational with Pak navy .. You too retarded to know that.

C-602s have been in service since 2014

https://www.google.com.pk/amp/s/www...tan-navy-deploys-chinese-c-602-cruise-missile

View attachment 362257

Continue your chewtiyapa

Pakistan has been able to deploy only coastal c-602 batteries, it is unable to deploy C-602G on present missile boxes of C-802 on F-22P, which it needs a new launch system for deploying the C-602G on ships.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

lol, that was no anonymous report but by the International Assessment and Stategy Center(a thing tank allied to Stanford University).
Stanford University which is worth more than all of Pakistan's universities has published this book through it's publication wing.

The article doesn't even mention the report or its source... I can post more articles claiming Pak copied tomahawk ... So stfu.

Also China or Ukraine don't have any missile similar to Babur. Which proves my point.

Even the status of Rk-55 isn't known.. It was never developed nor deployed!

The report makes it clear that the missiles were delivered from Ukraine by 2001 and thus it took a few years before Pakistan could get them from China.

So Pak got it from China yet amazingly China itself doesn't posses a similar cruise missile ? No shyt Sherlock.

Anyways even after 12 years after getting them from China, Pakistan still has to import even Baburs turbofan engine.

Really? We don't ? Okay no problemo .. We are least have operational missiles instead of failed shyt.

Get BTFO:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...to-major-uranium-supply-deal/article23967494/

http://www.ccnr.org/exports_3.html


http://www.nti.org/learn/facilities/832/

http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/india/india-nuclear-miles.html



GTFO here.

Pakistan has been able to deploy only coastal c-602 batteries, it is unable to deploy C-602G on present missile boxes of C-802 on F-22P, which it needs a new launch system for deploying the C-602G on ships.

You fool... C-602G is a land attack missile.

And just to damn retarded to even read;
https://www.google.com.pk/amp/s/www...tan-navy-deploys-chinese-c-602-cruise-missile

ISLAMABAD: Frontline units of Pakistan Navy have been equipped with the C-602 anti-ship cruise missiles purchased from China, according to Kanwa Defense Review published by Andrei Chang, also known as Pinkov, a Canadian military analyst.
Pakistan ordered about 120 C-602 anti-ship cruise missiles from China back in 2009. The first batch of the missiles, enough to equip a company, were delivered in 2011. After personnel completed training on using the missiles, the Pakistani government said that the C-602s had already been deployed by frontline naval units. The missiles were purchased to provide a countermeasure to India’s BrahMos supersonic cruise missile, which has a range of 290 kilometres.
The anti-ship cruise missiles have an estimated range of 280 km with a speed of 0.8 mach. The Kanwa Review said that the accuracy of the C-602 can be increased gradually if a deal is made between the two countries. Pakistan is currently the only foreign operator of the C-602.


http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/c-602.htm

 

[Comfortably Numb]

Pakistan has been able to deploy only coastal c-602 batteries, it is unable to deploy C-602G on present missile boxes of C-802 on F-22P, which it needs a new launch system for deploying the C-602G on ships.

Yar nirbhay ka ghussa hum pe kiyun nikalte ho

 

[Asgard]

Dipshyt the article doesn't even mention the report or its source... I can post more articles claiming Pak copied tomahawk ... So stfu and gtfo.

Also China or Ukraine don't have any missile similar to Babur. Which proves my point.





So Pak got it from China yet amazingly China itself doesn't posses a similar cruise missile ? No shyt Sherlock.





Really? We don't ? Okay no problemo .. We are least have operational missiles instead of failed shyt.

http://www.ccnr.org/exports_3.html


http://www.nti.org/learn/facilities/832/

http://www.wisconsinproject.org/countries/india/india-nuclear-miles.html



GTFO here.



You fool... C-602G is a land attack missile.

View attachment 362261

The book appendix clearly mentions the source.
Anyways Stanford University Press and Stanford affiliated Think tanks are more credible than your country combined.

Chinese DH-10A early variant are reverse engineered Kh-65SE but as they were not satisfied with 600-700 km range, they had to modify later variants.

Pakistan navy intended to deploy C-602G on ships, moron.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

The book appendix clearly mentions the source.
Anyways Stanford University Press and Stanford affiliated Think tanks are more credible than your country combined.

No it doesn't!

Chinese DH-10A early variant are reverse engineered Kh-65SE but as they were not satisfied with 600-700 km range, they had to modify later variants.
.

Moron .. Do you thinks it's so easy to increase a missiles range ?

So called DH-10 had been in development since the 90s! And not 2001.


Here is the DH-10/CJ-10

Here is the RK-55 you were moaning about ;

And this is Babur:

Moron Babur isn't even half the size of Rk or Cj-10! Yet carries a 450 KG warhead against 500 carried by CJ-10.

And the specs are also entirely different..

Also various international sources claim that the Cj-10 was developed from a KH-55 and not some short ranged variant previously believed.

Pakistan navy intended to deploy C-602G on ships, moron

Low life ... C-602G is a 290 km land attack CM...


Pak Navy wants to deploy Babur G2G and Babur Anti ship missile .. Both having a range of over 750km... And I just gave you official GOP document to prove that.

Also Pak didn't but C-602G.

Rather C-602 ASHM is used as a coast defence missile...

And as per speculation the "Zarb" anti ship missile tested by Pak Navy in April is a C series missile produced under license ;

Pakistan Navy inducts coastal anti-ship 'Zarb' missile after successful test




So buzz off.

 

[Windjammer]

@DESERT FIGHTER , stop wasting your time with an other unemployed troll from the mess on the other side of the border.
I have already busted him , so put your info to better use. NO need to entertain these time wasters.

 

[Asgard]

No it doesn't!



Moron .. Do you thinks it's so easy to increase a missiles range ?

So called DH-10 had been in development since the 90s! And not 2001.


Here is the DH-10/CJ-10

View attachment 362264 View attachment 362265 View attachment 362266


Here is the RK-55 you were moaning about ;View attachment 362269View attachment 362270

And this is Babur:

View attachment 362272

View attachment 362273

Moron Babur isn't even half the size of Rk or Cj-10! Yet carries a 450 KG warhead against 500 carried by CJ-10.

And the specs are also entirely different..

Also various international sources claim that the Cj-10 was developed from a KH-55 and not some short ranged variant previously believed.

Yes, it does.

Chinese development of CJ-10 in 90s was an epic failure, which is why they started looking into the black market and found Ukrainian missiles for Purchase.

Ukraine delivered 18 KH-65SE(smaller conventional variant of RK-55 firstvreveaked in 94-95) to Iran & China by 1999-01

China started researching further modification of the missile as it didn't meet PLA range requirements but Pakistan deemed the then variant sufficient for it's needs.

Thus we have the Babur whose turbofans and electronics are still imported by Pakistan even 12 years later

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Yes, it does.

Chinese development of CJ-10 in 90s was an epic failure, which is why they started looking into the black market and found Ukrainian missiles for Purchase.

Ukraine delivered 18 KH-65SE(smaller conventional variant of RK-55 firstvreveaked in 94-95) to Iran & China by 1999-01

China started researching further modification of the missile as it didn't meet PLA range requirements but Pakistan deemed the then variant sufficient for it's needs.

Thus we have the Babur whose turbofans and electronics are still imported by Pakistan even 12 years later

Stfu .. Here is the Iranian KH variant.. Soumar

KH

CJ-10

Babur

The tested missile — described in the ISPR statement as ‘Babur Weapon System Version-2’ — had enhanced targeting capabilities, said an expert. “It has more precision,” he said.

“The missile incorporates advanced aerodynamics and avionics that can strike targets both at land and sea with high accuracy,” the ISPR said.