JonAsad
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2007
- Messages
- 14,178
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
L O L you need to know your terrorist any how pic above is Saud al-Faisal.
Oh so you meant him-
-
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
L O L you need to know your terrorist any how pic above is Saud al-Faisal.
Could be or may be he is khomenai. hmmmmmmmIs that Bandar bin Sultan: Prince of Terrorists ?
Could be or may be he is khomenai. hmmmmmmm
Was that suppose to piss me off. lol fail bro.
How calm was Saddam Hussein when facing death...The video still sends chills down my spine.The cowards were chanting "Moqtada" "Moqtada".Saddam turned to them and smiled ,"Do you consider this bravery?".
They made the video because the kafirs thought that Saddam would beg to be spared but they wre wrong as he remained defiant till the very end and welcomed death with open arms.Reciting the Kalima Shahadat before meeting his end proves that he is a shaheed no matter what the rawafid say.
Deep down inside they know it themselves.
The Gulf media never claimed that the current situation in Iraq is solely led by Sunni rebels but both the ISIS and many clans from Anbar and elsewhere. Here is a fresh quote from todays report. So yeah you can say both are storming Al-Mailki and his government so far with many lands falling into their hands while the incompetent army of Iraq fled away.
Conspiracy theory, USA said Saddam was aiding Al Qaeda/Osama same BS.Iran and Al-Qaeda treaty is still up to date that is why Iran has sheltered AQ members before and never been attacked by AQ at all. The ISIS current political and military aim is to control Iraq and Syria then spilt from there, hint Lebanon is not under ISIS threats.
.Izzat Al-Douri has a hand in what is going on Iraq, he probably facilitated the ISIS to Iraq too since the ISIS is filled with ex army members
The sleeper cells who recently have been caught are those who went through the rehab program and then were sat free. Almost all of them were in jail and are under trial. Sympathizers of the ISIS are everywhere in the Arab and Muslim world but no chaos, protest or slogans have taken place so far. We are here and prospering while you and Iran are sinking down. Both are failed states.
Your dream to see unrest in the Gulf and Jordan will not happen so keep dreaming.
There is no clear Salafi parities in KSA that holds political vision neither in the GCC nor in Jordan. Those who call themselves salafis wherever they are stand against any rebellious against Muslim rulers and that makes them anti ISIS by nature.
Salafi means "early Muslim" referring to those who died within the first four hundred years after the Prophet PBUH death including the four scholars of the four Sunni Madhab. The term "Salafi" was revived as movement by the followers of Jamal al-Din al-Afghani just so you know that Salafi has no political interests whatsoever so your claim in regard to KSA is invalid. You talk like you know but you don't.
A lot of the plans have materialized here 1 year after.
How calm was Saddam Hussein when facing death...The video still sends chills down my spine.The cowards were chanting "Moqtada" "Moqtada".Saddam turned to them and smiled ,"Do you consider this bravery?".
They made the video because the kafirs thought that Saddam would beg to be spared but they wre wrong as he remained defiant till the very end and welcomed death with open arms.Reciting the Kalima Shahadat before meeting his end proves that he is a shaheed no matter what the rawafid say.
Deep down inside they know it themselves.
@1000
ISIS is led by former Ba'athis and nationalistic Sunnis that want to restore order and who are not willing to be Mullahistan puppets of the retarded "Islamic Republic" led by fake wannabe-Arab Gypsies.
The foreigners of which most are Chechens are only used as cannon fodder. Those are the retards that are either killed or captured. People with military experience are coordinating everything else behind the scenes. Anti-regime tribes etc. as well. ISIS would not have succeeded in controlling most of the Sunni Arab areas in Iraq (half of the Iraqi territory) if the locals combated them heavily/were 100% against them. This is a fact. This is a Sunni Arab revolution.
Nowhere did I support Maliki. Also Maliki won't stay for what I know. land took by Kurds won't be accepted anyway, they took benefit from the situation, local Arabs and Turkmens said they won't accept it, that part isn't over yet.The point is that Al-Maliki is a retarded Shia Islamist as I have always told which you did not believe. I predicted this long ago. Both are trash yet Al-Maliki and his Shia retarded Islamist parties are doing nothing other than destroying Iraq.
Now the Kurds have stolen land in Northern Iraq which they have nothing to do with. This is the legacy of Maliki.
All this nonsense of Sunnis not accepting non-Sunni rule is a lame excuse.
My 'Sunni' family in Baghdad is doing alright, the news is exaggerating and spreading false information all the way.The fact is that Shias were never ready to rule a country. Something they have never done before. Most of the Iraqi Shia elite lived outside the country as political migrants/refugees. Either in Mullahistan, Syria or in the West. They did not know anything about politics or the ground realities when they returned alongside the American invaders.
ISIS should have been defeated a long time ago, the retard Maliki should have been kicked back to Mullahistan or where he wants to be, all the Shia terrorist groups that are now parading in the open with the blessing of the Shia Islamist retards that "rule" Iraq have reemerged instead of being targeted and removed. This is not going to solve any sectarianism. Only increase it. Now Sunnis are being persecuted in Baghdad again, again like in many other traditionally Sunni cities before that.
Maliki and his pathetic regime could not create any stability because their politics were horrible and even if he wanted to play dictator (which he is doing a bad job at) then he would have been like Saddam and at least there would have been order and the region would not be on fire.
But thank your allies Mullahistan and the holy wannabe-Arab cows that rule that pariah state for their gift in 1979. Half of the problems seen today would not have existed with that so-called "revolution".
Now this will not end before one of the sides have been defeated and already now (which everyone knew beforehand) Shias are in big trouble like always if this becomes regional/worldwide.