What's new

Joint Parliamentary session on Kashmir

I told you and other sarakari fanboys onboard,our concern is about demographic change and genocide.Bharat has taken advice from Usrael,more like a West Bank in our backyard is going to popup soon.
We don't recognise constitution of same state with whom we did IWT & Shimla agreement and we have diplomatic relations.
Our response is very weak.They have done massive builtup in IOK,it isn't without purpose.
I don't mind about Pakistani response,we are same nation who didn't blinked an eye when Bharatis raped females from age of 13 to 80 in kunan poshpora in 1991.
What can we do and what could have been done?

This is not about PTI, PMLN or PPP as some people are doing siyasat on this issue as well.. Please enlighten us all on the options Pakistan had in the past.. Didn't we try Kargil in 1999? Did we have capability or capacity left after Taliban government was thrown into dustbin by world powers? Weren't we busy in securing two borders?

And now, what could have been done? A money starved country, which doesn't have a penny to return 27 billion dollars in two years.. with a current account imbalance of 30 billion dollar p.a.. FIghting with an enemy 7 times the size of us.. having over 500 billion dollars of reserves.. no insurgencies around them anywhere..

You are a senior member even according to your age.. people here need to hear solutions.. not government bashing all the time..
 
.
Exactly.
Article 370 is not specifically mentioned in the resolution presented by the Govt in joint parliament session...WHY?

There seems something wrong....!!
I thinke GOP is in bed with GOI here.


PM Imran addresses joint session of parliament on Indian actions in occupied Kashmir
Dawn.comUpdated August 06, 2019
Facebook Count96
Twitter Share
10
5d496549512be.jpg

Prime Minister Imran Khan speaks in the parliament on Aug 6. — DawnNewsTV
Joint session of the parliament resumed on Tuesday after government agreed to amend the resolution regarding Indian actions in occupied Kashmir.

Prime Minister Imran Khan, who was absent from the parliament when session began in the morning, also arrived to deliver a policy statement.

The prime minister, in his address, said that his government's priority was to improve relations with all Pakistan's neighbours because it was vital to improve the country's economic situation.

"This session is not only important for the Kashmiri people and the Pakistani people, it will have repercussions around the world. That is why I request all to listen carefully," he began.

"When we took up government (of Pakistan), our main priority was to address poverty in our country. We reached out to all our neighbours, because without having a semblance of normalcy in ties, we cannot attain stability and alleviate poverty.

"All my trips to neighbouring countries were meant for this purpose. I visited Afghanistan, and asked them that we work to address our past differences. I talked to India, telling them if you take one step towards us, we will come two step towards you. I went to Iran [with similar aims] and I visited America.

"When I first reached out to India, they expressed concerns that there were militant outfits operating from Pakistan. I told [Narendra] Modi that after the grave and painful tragedy of the Army Public School massacre, all our political parties had resolved to never let the territory of Pakistan be used for terrorist activities. But I got the feeling that the Indian side was not serious about talks. When we went to Bishkek, my suspicions regarding their unwillingness to speak was strengthened."

"I soon realised that India was not interested in talking to us," the premier told the parliament. "They took our overtures for peace as weakness, so we stopped extending offers to hold talks.

"Then Pulwama happened. Thank God our air force responded in the way it did. We shot down their pilot, but returned him immediately to send the message that we did not want war. We resolved that we would not move forward on talks over Kashmir till after the [Indian] elections. The elections happened.

"What happened yesterday has only confirmed my suspicion [about India's unwillingness to talk]. This is not a decision they [the BJP] have taken out of the blue. It was part of their election manifesto all along. It is, in fact, ingrained in their ideology that puts Hindus above all other religions and seeks to establish a state that represses all other religious groups."

The joint session of upper and lower houses was summoned by President Arif Alvi yesterday to decide Pakistan's future course of action in the wake of India's decision to strip occupied Kashmir of its special status under Article 370. But the session was disrupted soon after beginning by protest from opposition lawmakers who pointed out that the resolution, moved by Federal Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Azam Khan Swati condemning India's "illegal actions" in occupied Kashmir, did not specifically mention Article 370 of the Indian constitution.

Explainer: What India's change to occupied Kashmir's status means
 
. . .
He didnt forget to add...opposition wants Pakistan to accept Indian law of including Kashmir as special status under India...that is what 370 stated....why should we accept that?
I got your point ….. PM said and I quote : If india did (try) any thing in AJK then Pakistan will respond !! ok that is good , but my question is .. What about IOK ?????? What we will do if india try to change papulation their ? india already changed geography status ….. And we did nothing (at least so far )…..
And almost nothing came out from Cor-Cop-Conference ,, usual taslii or lip service ..
 
Last edited:
.
So opposition wants us to legitimise Indian law for disputed territory and give it Indian special status? Traitor

The joint session of upper and lower houses was summoned by President Arif Alvi yesterday to decide Pakistan's future course of action in the wake of India's decision to strip occupied Kashmir of its special status under Article 370. But the session was disrupted soon after beginning by protest from opposition lawmakers who pointed out that the resolution, moved by Federal Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Azam Khan Swati condemning India's "illegal actions" in occupied Kashmir, did not specifically mention Article 370 of the Indian constitution.



https://www.dawn.com/news/1498420/p...ulfil-our-obligations-to-kashmiri-people-ispr


"Pakistan never recognised the sham Indian efforts to legalise its occupation of Jammu & Kashmir through article 370 or 35-A decades ago, efforts which have now been revoked by India itself," Ghafoor said in a series of tweets from his official account.




These NRO'ed American sponsored traitors, so called opposition, needs to be hanged by their balls, upside down.
 
.
@Dubious seriously why are you wasting your time on these dumbfucks? Do you really think they care what you have to say? Do you really think they care what PM IK does or say? Do you really think they would appreciate anything good that he would do or whatever stance he takes? Do you really think that these war mongers criticizing PM IK will actually volunteer and go to the front lines?

If you answer yes to any of the above questions then i am sorry to say but you might be a bigger retard than them.

I also don't understand why Kashmiris want to join Pakistan, this country is full of criminals and traitors.
 
.
No
If we don't accept the article why mention it and dance around it?

If we don't make a song and dance about it now it is the acceptance of Indian misdeeds. Someone have been robbed of their rights and possessions and doing nothing is the tacit acceptance of robbery. Please don't give me some half baked logic and I want to see our nation speaks with one voice loud and clear and be counted. Not interested in opposition or so and so politicians of any shade or colour, my only thoughts are for those who do good and try to their best for our country.
 
.
And we did nothing (at least so far )…..
And almost nothing came out from Cor-Cop-Conference ,, usual taslii or lip service ..
Snipers are busy scoring head shots, artillery is busy pounding posts across loc. I don't expect Pak Army to invade IOK at this point but be prepaired when given an excuse.
 
.
Just look at fuking position (abu bacho azzholes) the are trying their best to portray this as like GoP sold Kashmir to India...…… These MOFOS , Hramies ……

Snipers are busy scoring head shots, artillery is busy pounding posts across loc. I don't expect Pak Army to invade IOK at this point but be prepaired when given an excuse.
Bhai Allah Karay wo Din Na aye .. War is not good...… First of all I want Full Kashmir (including Ladkah) but if we have to give peace a chance then I am in favour of Taking Jammu-Kashmir(Valley) and some Muslim areas of Ladkah.. .. And let go Ladkah (minues Muslim majority area).. This will be face saving for both nations
 
.
Not the time to play politics, shame on the position...traitors
 
.
Citizens do not want tasalee. They want to war for Kashmir.

Something which is coming in the way of Noble Peace prize for cricketers turned politicians turned demagogues

No. Citizens don't want, they want peace and prosperity. Just look at Afghanistan and Syria, that's a good lesson of what war does. Go spread your hate and idiocy somewhere else.

Whenever you feel ready.

Sure. Will you join me?

We got no intention to fight a war, only you want to. Please by all means, pick up an AK47 and go attack an Indian check post. Shouldn't be that hard right? GO, why you posting here.

Did you come after 27th feb? And still may be and not sure? So just to check if you come or not we start never ending war?

Na, he's all talk. As soon as he got called out @Retired Troll , he ran the other way. He don't want to fight a war, he got no ba**s
 
.
Would you not have done the same if government conveniently forget to mention the article 370 which is the route cause of the problem and would have the centre piece of the discussion? We are talking about the business of government not a tea party. Looks like it government knew what India was about to do and did nothing beforehand for the appeasement of US and some dollars and that's plain and simple treachery. Some one explain to me what's the meaning of treason in plain and simple language?
Read this tweet
Now, check it was preplanned. This traitorous daughter of Ghaddar had instructed them to do so
 
.
Just look at fuking position (abu bacho azzholes) the are trying their best to portray this as like GoP sold Kashmir to India...…… These MOFOS , Hramies ……


Bhai Allah Karay wo Din Na aye .. War is not good...… First of all I want Full Kashmir (including Ladkah) but if we have to give peace a chance then I am in favour of Taking Jammu-Kashmir(Valley) and some Muslim areas of Ladkah.. .. And let go Ladkah (minues Muslim majority area).. This will be face saving for both nations
Securing just the Valley may even be a good tradeoff for Kashmiris but they have to decide it as equal stake holders.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom