What's new

John Kerry asks Pakistan to reduce nuclear arsenal

.
Carrot comes with the string attached to a stick.
 
.
It is injustice and hypocrisy to discuss nuclear programme of Pakistan without any discussion about unfinished agenda of Partition. We must remember that
K is followed by N. Discuss about kashmir before talking about Nuclear reduction.
If you are not intrested to solve K issue, we don't care about your concerns on N matters. Because K precedes N.
 
Last edited:
.
It is injustice and hypocrisy to discuss nuclear programme of Pakistan without any discussion about unfinished agenda of Partition. We must remember that
K is followed by N. Discuss about kashmir before talking about Nuclear reduction.
If you are not intrested to solve K issue, we don't care about your concerns on N matters. Because N precedes K.
How does N solve the K??
 
.
Carrot comes with the string attached to a stick.

One way or other, US forced to offer Pakistan the same "Nuclear Deal" which India gets.....Otherwise we will be a headache of future proliferation towards KSA, Turkey and others allies with no check and balance.

Pakistan need not to worry, just wait and see........USA will come to us Soon.
 
.
I think there's an important principle missing here: you feel no responsibility to check facts yourself, you merely assert what you want and leave it to others to try to disprove it. So why should anything you write be respected?
Because whatever you write is either bulshit (your personal vendetta) or is sourced from unauthentic source, Hence which is why it never gets the respect.

Secondly, the same can be said about yourself when you deliberately dismiss and paint the hostilities against innocent as white
 
. .
Because whatever you write is either bulshit (your personal vendetta) or is sourced from unauthentic source, Hence which is why it never gets the respect.
Not a very convincing argument coming from a guy who doesn't cite sources for what he asserts as "facts", is it?
 
.
F-16 vs Nukes = who wins ?

does Pakistan members/people believe that their Govt & Military are telling the truth to them.

This strategic meeting should have been approved by Military otherwise Democratically elected Govt would haven't gone ahead.
 
.
Not a very convincing argument coming from a guy who doesn't cite sources for what he asserts as "facts", is it?
Hi,

Your facts have been debunk3d in previous thread in case of youve forgotten. So what difference does it make now. You only see what you want to see
 
. . . . . .
Back
Top Bottom