John Kerry asks Pakistan to reduce nuclear arsenal

[salarsikander]

We did. You seem to have missed that.

Hello,
By an insignificant amount, which hardly makes any difference in battlefield

 

[Maarkhoor]

The strong conventional defense can do the same.

We don't have money + economy to build such conventional strength, Above all west will not provide every thing what we like to purchase remember F-16 deal...

 

[The Eagle]

We don't have money + economy to build such conventional strength, Above all west will not provide every thing what we like to purchase remember F-16 deal..

Well in case, if US & West (indeed as per the wish of our rival) wants us to reduce the N numbers so we can work out on that matter but on condition that they may help us build our conventional power head par to our enemy otherwise, we are happy with our N arsenal which is must due to the need and security. Like now, they have to do more. IMO.

 

[Max]

If indians are agree to reduce their stock of nukes, i say we should too reduce ours. but if Kerry means unilaterally then our strategic "ally" is not doing any favour to us, but our enemy.. and Kerry know the possible answer from Pakistan too..

 

[Sipahi]

We dont have to reduce it since we just surpass hundred. Some countries in the world have them in thousands.

We can stop building it but what will they offer us in exchange ???? Thats the main question.

 

[CriticalThinker02]

Americans first acknowledge and remove the nukes Israel have and put pressure to India to do the same and then come to Pakistan and talk about our nukes, in the mean time you are more than welcomed to stick this middle finger up yours where the sun doesn't shine.

 

[Solomon2]

Hello,
By an insignificant amount, which hardly makes any difference in battlefield

link

Why didn't you look this up yourself, before making such a pronouncement?

 

[rockstar08]

this demand is been rejected so many times, seriously Do American have any shame left ?
after using Nukes on Japan , having numerous incidents that almost cause nuclear detonations , they are still preaching others to reduce the number of Nukes ?

stop Invading other countries , stop backing countries that destroy nuclear reactors in other countries , stop making Organization like AQ , ISIS and Taliban , stop toppling Governments and than talk ..

 

[Nefarious]

I doubt the Americans expect much from Pakistan on this request, just sounds like lip service to scared 3rd party's.

U.S with 5000 high yield nukes is more then enough to deal with worst case scenario. Everyone dead.

Pakistan should work on more complex delivery systems ie MIRV's and more stealthy long range cruise missiles. Lovely.

 

[T-123456]

Yes you should reduce them by sending some(50) to us for safekeeping.

 

[salarsikander]

link

Why didn't you look this up yourself, before making such a pronouncement?

Are you kidding me ??

You Are providing link from Wiki ?

 

[Solomon2]

Are you kidding me ??

You Are providing link from Wiki ?

You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

 

[salarsikander]

You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

Hi,
At least provide facts from genuine source

 

[Solomon2]

Hi,
At least provide facts from genuine source

I think there's an important principle missing here: you feel no responsibility to check facts yourself, you merely assert what you want and leave it to others to try to disprove it. So why should anything you write be respected?

 

[WaLeEdK2]

Same request over and over again, same answer. Don't these people know when to give up? For gods sake they sanctioned the hell out of us in the 90's. If we didn't stop then what makes them think we're gonna stop now?