What's new

JL2 sub-lanuching ICBM succeeded in tests on December,26th,2010

Don't forget that the cross-straits relations just relatively recently started to improve. As more people on both sides visit each other, and deal with each other, I believe the reunification thought will be much more relevant for the ones living in Taiwan.
:smitten::china::smitten:

Perhaps I should visit Taiwan as well next summer :cheers:
 
Congrats to China.
but the 096 is in development so the test platform would be 094.
24 is a good possibility because 094 carry 12 at 8-9000 tonnes
so the new one can carry more by increasing the size to 20-24000 tonnes.
 
ÖйúÍòËê-ProsperThroughCo-op;1390916 said:
Hoping for Taiwan to return to the Motherland. A huge potential awaits.
:china:

approaching!my dude.
 
approaching!my dude.


我是大陆人。
只要台湾不宣布独立,我不支持大陆武力统一台湾,因为这意味着内战的重新爆发,无论有什么理由,无论会造成多少伤害和损失,挑起民族内战的行为都是错误的。
当然如果台湾放弃中国国名宣布独立,则可以当作占领中国重要领土的异国来对待,这种情况下任何行为都是正义的。

另外我支持KMT一方的几点要求:
1,我支持繁简两种文字并用。
2,我支持台湾保持现有的政治体系,居民所拥有的各种权利不变。
3,我支持承认KMT军队在抗战时所做出的贡献,并给予正面评价。
4,对国号和国旗的更改要求可以考虑,但必须经过全民公决来决定。
 
其实只要大陆再发展30年人均经济超过台湾就自动回归了.
 
That is a certainty. The only question is when. Will it be 2025? 2035? 2049?

With China's phenomenal progress in military technology and overall comprehensive national strength, I cannot see Taiwan remaining de facto independent past 2049.

By the 100th anniversary of the founding of New China, I'm willing to predict that Beijing's patience will have been exhausted.

Within 15 years, likely. I will attempt to quantitatively explain. because "living standards" is a very broad term that does not take into account public conveniences (after all, a country with no military, no public transportation, no roads, but everyone live in mansion and have private jet is a high living standard but useless country) I can only use a more "fuzzy" term: Psychological equality. That is when the notion that two people are "in the same economic category" is applied, that there is no significant discrepency in wealth and two people can talk as equals.

According to what people consider a "developed nation" we can use the US as an example, and consider that US's GDP/capita is 3x that of taiwan which is 4x that of China according to IMF 2010, and considered "developed" with "comparable salaries". So we can say that countries whose GDPs are within a factor of 3 of each other, are "equals".

This also explains why Chinese cannot see Indians as equals: Our GDP/capitas are not within a factor of 3 of each other (4300/1100 > 3). We are not in the same category - we are a developing-developed country while India is a developing-undeveloped country, since we are not within a factor of 3 of each other. This gap is also not closing, but rather widening, further increasing the gulf between Chinese and Indian psychologies.

(List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

At current growth rates, it will take only 1 year for the ratio of US:Taiwan GDP/capita to match Taiwan:Mainland GDP/capita. Essentially, we are already "in the same category".

For total integration, US:UK GDP/capita ratio is 4/3. Assuming constant 2009 growth rates of 9.1 for mainland, and 2% growth average for Taiwan (not counting the 2009 negative growth), the time needed for Taiwan/Mainland GDP ratio to reach this value is 2023 at 21,000:15,000 USD.

This is the upper bound on reunification; it can be adjusted downwards by appreciation of the RMB but is unlikely to be adjusted downwards in the light of mainland's previous economic performance. The lower bound, of course, is not limited by anything other than political pressure by far right radicals like Chen Shui Bian and Li Deng Hui.
 
Last edited:
ÎÒÊÇ´ó½ÈË¡£
ֻҪ̨Íå²»Ðû²¼¶ÀÁ¢£¬ÎÒ²»Ö§³Ö´ó½ÎäÁ¦Í³Ò»Ì¨Í壬ÒòΪÕâÒâζ×ÅÄÚÕ½µÄÖØб¬·¢£¬ÎÞÂÛÓÐʲôÀíÓÉ£¬ÎÞÂÛ»áÔì³É¶àÉÙÉ˺¦ºÍËðʧ£¬ÌôÆðÃñ×åÄÚÕ½µÄÐÐΪ¶¼ÊÇ´íÎóµÄ¡£
µ±È»Èç¹ų̂Íå·ÅÆúÖйú¹úÃûÐû²¼¶ÀÁ¢£¬Ôò¿ÉÒÔµ±×÷Õ¼ÁìÖйúÖØÒªÁìÍÁµÄÒì¹úÀ´¶Ô´ý£¬ÕâÖÖÇé¿öÏÂÈκÎÐÐΪ¶¼ÊÇÕýÒåµÄ¡£

ÁíÍâÎÒÖ§³ÖKMTÒ»·½µÄ¼¸µãÒªÇó£º
1£¬ÎÒÖ§³Ö·±¼òÁ½ÖÖÎÄ×Ö²¢Óá£
2£¬ÎÒÖ§³Ǫ̈Íå±£³ÖÏÖÓеÄÕþÖÎÌåϵ£¬¾ÓÃñËùÓµÓеĸ÷ÖÖȨÀû²»±ä¡£
3£¬ÎÒÖ§³Ö³ÐÈÏKMT¾ü¶ÓÔÚ¿¹Õ½Ê±Ëù×ö³öµÄ¹±Ï×£¬²¢¸øÓèÕýÃæÆÀ¼Û¡£
4£¬¶Ô¹úºÅºÍ¹úÆìµÄ¸ü¸ÄÒªÇó¿ÉÒÔ¿¼ÂÇ£¬µ«±ØÐë¾*¹ýÈ«Ãñ¹«¾öÀ´¾ö¶¨¡£

Same blood same cultrue,lots of tws knew it,but a kind of superority keep them from concesion,with a sires of strike (both eco and tech),the ice is merging
 
i dislike right wings, but they do have a right to speak, just not as much as left wings =) sometimes the censors get lazy and let one or two go through, haha.
 
i dislike right wings, but they do have a right to speak, just not as much as left wings =) sometimes the censors get lazy and let one or two go through, haha.

Dude, I guess you consider the crustaceans are left wings. :disagree:Right-wing conservatives are not lefties because of color. But surely, they dislike reformists like some students.

You may thought they were left wings at least when the founder was alive. :disagree: The most important thing for a true lefty is not to oppose the west, but to bring democracy to workers who actually made wealth. I don't think there once existed any worker's democratic area except Paris, no matter what they boosted. Of course, many ppl will not like that to become the reality.

OK, OK, It's not proper to discuss damn politics, my fault. Discussing these crap here can not change anything. mo tan guo shi :partay: I just wanted to explain sth. Any problem is a political problem. No wonder no main problem will be truly solved somewhere.

Now let's get back to weapons.

Peace....:lol::D
 
Last edited:
It is widely known among the Chinese military forum that there are about 6 type 094 being operational. Type 1/Type 2/Type 3.

This is the Type 1 SSBN(12 SLBMs), the other two types are not unveiled yet.

type-094-pic2.jpg


This is the model of the Type 2 SSBN(16 SLBMs).

133925672006061113220393578500.jpg

Got any info on the Type 2?

Is Type 3 the 096?
 
Back
Top Bottom