JF-17B Updates, News & Discussion

[Xeson]

@seven0seven @Haris Ali2140 the pic on right is mirror on scale of 1:1 to help with perspective.
P.s. Intake wider, Spine thick and straight, cone a bit longer may b. Ok lets leave it to the learned ones.

 

[Ultima Thule]

View attachment 593689

By comparison to regular pics wit latest one you notice that, in regular pics spine is curved but in latest one spine is in straight ???

View attachment 593690
@seven0seven @Haris Ali2140 the pic on right is mirror on scale of 1:1 to help with perspective.

You notice bro latest Pic has a straight spine and older has a curved spine

 

[Xeson]

You notice bro latest Pic has a straight spine and older has a curved spine

As it seems, I do concur.

 

[Haris Ali2140]

By comparison to regular pics wit latest one you notice that, in regular pics spine is curved but in latest one spine is in straight ???


You notice bro latest Pic has a straight spine and older has a curved spine

I am more focused on the intakes.
Regarding the spine in older pic the spine merges into fuselage before vertical stabilizer whereas in the latest pic it looks like it even goes beyond the vertical stabilizer.

 

[StormBreaker]

View attachment 593690
@seven0seven @Haris Ali2140 the pic on right is mirror on scale of 1:1 to help with perspective.
P.s. Intake wider, Spine thick and straight, cone a bit longer may b. Ok lets leave it to the learned ones.

It does seem wider than usual by about 2.5-3ft.

Secondly, wing seems a bit bulkier as well.

 

[Ultima Thule]

I am more focused on the intakes.

i think its looks wider because of squeezing of pic???

 

[StormBreaker]

View attachment 593690
@seven0seven @Haris Ali2140 the pic on right is mirror on scale of 1:1 to help with perspective.
P.s. Intake wider, Spine thick and straight, cone a bit longer may b. Ok lets leave it to the learned ones.

But ground clearance remains same and nose as well.

 

[Haris Ali2140]

i think its looks wider because of squeezing of pic???

Look at the edges.

 

[StormBreaker]

i think its looks wider because of squeezing of pic???

No... focus it again, take the left image a bit far in your mind and rotate the right image on x axis a bit towards you

 

[Ultima Thule]

It does seem wider than usual by about 2.5-3ft.

Secondly, wing seems a bit bulkier as well.

are you talking about spine, if you say so, then i have to say ITS IMPOSSIBLE

 

[StormBreaker]

are you talking about spine, if you say so, then i have to say ITS IMPOSSIBLE

Nope, i am talking about intake, it does seem a bit wider

 

[Haris Ali2140]

Nope, i am talking about intake, it does seem a bit wider

That too is impossible.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Nope, i am talking about intake, it does seem a bit wider

bro 2.5-3 extension is also IMPOSSIBLE
If this is JF-17B its retain RD-93, NO NEED FOR extended intakes, unless it is JF-17 Block 3 which will have a uprated engine RD-93MA or WS-13E

 

[Xeson]

Any picture even if squeezed would distort more on edges rather than at the center so much i believe, and that is why the width of intakes is weired. Example here.

 

[ziaulislam]

No the pic looks unedited.
Notice the shape of intakes. The intakes on the previous ones are more round.View attachment 593686

Also the nose