What's new

JF-17B Updates, News & Discussion

One would hope the NGF doesnt use sheet metal for the skin.

First of all it's not NGF discussion thread. However in regard to point you made; I can't imagine a plain sheet metal for NGF at all. There are obvious & understood rules for NGF in this particular area. Composites & then RAM coating plays major role. Now we can see how the designer will play along in frame work.
 
2P-84

vlcsnap-2020-09-09-19h20m12s314.png
 
Is there any evidence of different wing structure? Additional hard points/ strengthened stations? Block-III is supposedly based on the Bravo in some ways and we expect 4 BVRs on Block-III.
@khanasifm I think you have looked at wing structure in detail previously.

Is this even a Bravo to begin with, since some people are of the opinion there are still a few Block-IIs from the additional order of 12 remaining? @Pakistan Space Agency
 
the metal in the sheet metal can be an alloy / composite

kv
My understanding is composites use a different process, lying of fiber, gluing and baking. Nothing like sheet metal forming.
 
Is there any evidence of different wing structure? Additional hard points/ strengthened stations? Block-III is supposedly based on the Bravo in some ways and we expect 4 BVRs on Block-III.
@khanasifm I think you have looked at wing structure in detail previously.

Is this even a Bravo to begin with, since some people are of the opinion there are still a few Block-IIs from the additional order of 12 remaining? @Pakistan Space Agency

Yes, there are 3 remaining out of total of 62 Block-2 single seaters.

2P-60, 2P-61 and 2P-62 are now NAF-720, NAF-721 and NAF-722.

It's not confirmed but it looks like 2P-81, 2P-82 and 2P-83 (or possibly 2P-84 instead of 2P-81) are the single seaters for PAF.
 
Yes, there are 3 remaining out of total of 62 Block-2 single seaters.

2P-60, 2P-61 and 2P-62 are now NAF-720, NAF-721 and NAF-722.

It's not confirmed but it looks like 2P-81, 2P-82 and 2P-83 (or possibly 2P-84 instead of 2P-81) are the single seaters for PAF.
2P-82 is definitely Bravo. Swept vertical tail with fuel tank it it:
2P-82 Bravo.jpg
 
It seems PAC / CAC chose the team that designed the JL-9 canopy vs the team that designed JL-10 / L-15. JL-9 hinges on the outside, JL-10 / L-15 inside. Oh well, PAF / PAF Fans will just have to live with it.
 
It seems PAC / CAC chose the team that designed the JL-9 canopy vs the team that designed JL-10 / L-15. JL-9 hinges on the outside, JL-10 / L-15 inside. Oh well, PAF / PAF Fans will just have to live with it.
Let's hope there's no one the AZM team going, "wait till you see the hinges on the NGFA..."
 
It seems PAC / CAC chose the team that designed the JL-9 canopy vs the team that designed JL-10 / L-15. JL-9 hinges on the outside, JL-10 / L-15 inside. Oh well, PAF / PAF Fans will just have to live with it.
CAC also has the team that designed the J-10S's canopy without such hinges.
309c2370489b20a72bd70a.jpg
微信图片_20200719212313.jpg
 
Doesn't J-10S canopy lifts upwards like F-16 B/D ? JF-17 couldn't sacrifice anymore internal space so they had to settle for side opening and went with JL-9 style instead of JL-10.
 
CAC also has the team that designed the J-10S's canopy without such hinges.
View attachment 668448View attachment 668449
This is not a side opening canopy.
A cursory look on the matter suggest there are at least two jets with side opening canopies none of them have hinges on the outside. The hawk hinge is visible in this screen shot:

I wrote something but then it was not worth it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom