Windjammer
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2009
- Messages
- 41,319
- Reaction score
- 181
- Country
- Location
Armed to teeth, a JF-17 returns after an ADA sortie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They still believe it needs a thaila for transportation because that is what their plane doesI wonder if Indians still believe that the JF17 cannot fire BVRs because they personally have not see the IOC or FOC certificate saying it can or not .......
I don't blame them. The lot can't be helpedI wonder if Indians still believe that the JF17 cannot fire BVRs because they personally have not see the IOC or FOC certificate saying it can or not .......
I think SEAD will be important given the s400 purchase by the Indians. Can't just rely upon the Blinders
Well how can you argue with these geniuses ......on one hand they are waving a piece of an AMRAAM....and on the other, they call their SU-30, an AMRAAM dodger.I wonder if Indians still believe that the JF17 cannot fire BVRs because they personally have not see the IOC or FOC certificate saying it can or not .......
RD93MA and You don't use them if you are a dedicated EW aircraft. Never seen a Growler within anything but HARMS.Need a more powerful engine for that. Poor RD-93 can only do so much.
Plus, where do SRAAMs go?
Is it? An EW aircraft would still be used to jam/ spoof enemy radars.Very likely that SAMS (particularly S400) will be taken care of by the UAVS. Not the job for fighter jets, unless you can fire out of their detection range.
4 missiles, wont call it armed to the teeth, double rail and two under belly will make it armed to the teeth, my thoughts.. but thank u for sharing
4 missiles, wont call it armed to the teeth, double rail and two under belly will make it armed to the teeth, my thoughts.. but thank u for sharing
6 missiles are better than 4. This is not the same as describing your wangerIts neither the size and the number of the "thing" count, "how you use it" matters, just ask IAF we usually remind them of this, Abhi-nondon appreciates that too ......!
We have seen a dual rack recently4 missiles, wont call it armed to the teeth, double rail and two under belly will make it armed to the teeth, my thoughts.. but thank u for sharing
We aren't exactly talking about a heavy weight like F-15 or F/A184 missiles, wont call it armed to the teeth, double rail and two under belly will make it armed to the teeth, my thoughts.. but thank u for sharing
To an extent but the local scenario also matters. When the airspace is fairly compacted in terms of targets on either side then it depends on how many shots until you are merged.6 missiles are better than 4. This is not the same as describing your wanger
Shame on you for dragging their symbol of pride through mud, it's a different thing that they are actually made to bite the dust but then news never comes outNeed a more powerful engine for that. Poor RD-93 can only do so much.
Plus, where do SRAAMs go?
To an extent but the local scenario also matters. When the airspace is fairly compacted in terms of targets on either side then it depends on how many shots until you are merged.
2 SRMs + 4MRMs are a great fit for the subcontinent. The opposing side’s best weapons are limited to an odd 100 French aircraft. The aircraft supposedly the most powerful is really its actual weakness - its seen as far out as a a320. Its current weapons suite doesn’t have good “real life” performance.