Bilal Khan (Quwa)
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2016
- Messages
- 7,004
- Reaction score
- 97
- Country
- Location
I don't think the PAF will want to re-open the JF-17 design for such extensive work.Correct it wont be single platform but jf-17 with multiple variants will be the core force. For JF-17, we would see something like JF-17 NG if Chengdu crowd keeps their thinking hats on; for now Blk 3 / B models would be the dominant build for next 3-4 years. For NG, there would definitely have to be soul searching and most likely review Gripen NG to learn. Could we see canard configuration? better engine and more use of composites? Just some thoughts. There is a long long way to go and i see a lot of potential.
For all intents and purposes, the Gripen E/F (NG) is a different fighter from the Gripen C/D. Be it the new engine, the revised airframe (to space for additional fuel as well as a bigger engine and more electronics) or its greatly expanded range and payload, the E/F took some 7-10 years of development.
Personally, I believe the PAF would love to get Gripen E/F-type range and payload from its mainstay fighter, but I don't think that would come through the JF-17.
If you're going to basically invest in a new aircraft development program (which is what a Gripen NG-like JF-17 would require), then you might as well go all the way with a clean-sheet fifth-gen fighter (FGF) design that fetches you the E/F's range, payload and - ideally - supercruise with an internal payload, reduced RCS, etc.
In other words, the next mainstay jet will be Project Azm's FGF.