JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 7]

[Bratva]

I want to say KG600 but I can't find any good picture of it other than the one you've posted. Doesn't look like the KG300, which is what JF-17 was shown with.

Look at my post again. I added a pic of KG600

 

[JamD]

Look at the KG600 attached with intake hardpoint

Not to be a stickler for detail but:
1- The picture shows the opposite side of the pod.
2- If we assume it is symmetric then the intakes don't match. The one on the JF-17 is much much wider.

EDIT: Or I am just making a mountain out of a molehill

 

[Bratva]

Not to be a stickler for detail but:
1- The picture shows the opposite side of the pod.
2- If we assume it is symmetric then the intakes don't match. The one on the JF-17 is much much wider.

EDIT: Or I am just making a mountain out of a molehill

Nosecon indicates it to be a KG600. And most probably it is a CGI hence they didnt put quite exact dimensions of the pod

 

[HRK]

View attachment 325733

Can anyone identify what pod (if it is a pod) is on the centerline hardpoint? @Quwa @Windjammer @Oscar

appear somewhat similar to KG-300G jamming POD

BTW can you briefly describe the pic ... ??

 

[JamD]

Nosecon indicates it to be a KG600. And most probably it is a CGI hence they didnt put quite exact dimensions of the pod

The picture I posted is from a reliable source, I wouldn't dismiss it so easily.

You are right the nose does look similar. Definitely looks more like the KG600 than the KG300 to me. Perhaps the feature in the CFD is hidden from view in the pictures you've posted. So we're going for the KG600 then?

BTW can you briefly describe the pic ... ??

I believe it is just a rudimentary CFD analysis showing the pressure over the entire surface.

 

[HRK]

I believe it is just a rudimentary CFD analysis showing the pressure over the entire surface.

that even I can understand (a little bite) what I am more interested to know is it from any detail report & was this analysis conducted before the the JF-17 crash or after the crash (after the strengthening of wings) ... ??

thnx in advance ...

 

[JamD]

that even I can understand (a little bite) what I am more interested to know is it from any detail report & was this analysis conducted before the the JF-17 crash or after the crash (after the strengthening of wings) ... ??

thnx in advance ...

Oh I am sorry, I misunderstood. This is a fairly recent image (past couple of months) so definitely after the crash. This isn't from a report or anything (to the best of my knowledge) but from someone senior who has worked on the JF-17. That's all I wish to divulge. I hope you understand.

 

[Quwa]

I want to say KG600 but I can't find any good picture of it other than the one you've posted. Doesn't look like the KG300, which is what JF-17 was shown with.

I remember @Bilal Khan 777 saying that Indra's gear was podded for use on the JF-17 - could it be that?

 

[SQ8]

View attachment 325733

Can anyone identify what pod (if it is a pod) is on the centerline hardpoint? @Quwa @Windjammer @Oscar

Generic stand in pod. Nothing specific.

Pretty much most purchases can be spotted via the Mod.pk yearly link.

 

[Tempest II]

I want to say KG600 but I can't find any good picture of it other than the one you've posted. Doesn't look like the KG300, which is what JF-17 was shown with.

Information from Paris 2015 (possibly Zhuhai 2014 if I am not mistaken) was that the KG600 was available for the Jf-17.

 

[TaimiKhan]

Guys thanks to @JamD for this wonderful informative pic,

https://defence.pk/threads/pakistan...tially-guided-bomb.292275/page-5#post-8567943

 

[Major Sam]

Guys thanks to @JamD for this wonderful informative pic,

https://defence.pk/threads/pakistan...tially-guided-bomb.292275/page-5#post-8567943

can you please explain?

 

[HRK]

can you please explain?

Indigenous Range Extension Kit ....

http://www.gids.com.pk/defence-english.pdf

 

[TaimiKhan]

can you please explain?

Something like this:

http://aviationweek.com/site-files/...e/Defense/Missiles/JDAM-ERs_for_RAAF-RAAF.jpg

 

[Hell hound]

Something like this:

http://aviationweek.com/site-files/...e/Defense/Missiles/JDAM-ERs_for_RAAF-RAAF.jpg

this REK has cep of about 20m. don't you think it is bit bigger then it should be. jdam has cep of 3 to 7 meters while Turkish system has cep of 6 meters