Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what is the load out on this jet?
what is the load out on this jet?
thanks.pl9c x2
SD-10A x2
1100 fuel tank x2
Ready for CAP or Scramble if required.
Hi,
Can you guide me to the original post to see why this reaction.
What's the difference between FADEC and DEEC?
@gambit @F-22Raptor @Oscar @messiach @Bilal Khan (Quwa) @Gomig-21
is that english?No difference between FADeC and DEEC/IDEEC except FADeC being full authority utilizes APRI - augmented PRI digital control which obviates need for SEC hydromechanical controls. IDEEC was introduced in PW 229 variants which also boast ATDPS - asymmetric thrust departure prevention which you may see in pakistans next gen fighters.
pl9c x2
SD-10A x2
1100 fuel tank x2
Ready for CAP or Scramble if required.
Are you sure about PL-9C? Because PAF opted for PL-5E.
did they say *RD93MA on Block III*?It is pl5e2 and newer Rd-93s will have full authority digital controls rd93ma on block 3
No difference between FADeC and DEEC/IDEEC except FADeC being full authority utilizes APRI - augmented PRI digital control which obviates need for SEC hydromechanical controls. IDEEC was introduced in PW 229 variants which also boast ATDPS - asymmetric thrust departure prevention which you may see in pakistans next gen fighters.
Statement based on open sources already know and guessMany thanks, madam. Is it correct to deduce that Pakistan's NG fighter may be twin engine?
Also, is it correct to say that DEEC is better because it gives the flexibility for manual override, if and when needed?
Lastly, is DEEC included on RD-93 by default or is it a Pakistani addition? I am asking because from Google it seems DEEC is a pretty much American innovation, so how come we have it on a Russian engine?