khanasifm
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2008
- Messages
- 7,082
- Reaction score
- 6
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. The F-16 is a Lockheed Martin product and only Lockheed Martin approved systems can go into it. Tampering with it otherwise will not only void any future support on the product but also damage our relationship with the manufacturer and the US.@Oscar @MastanKhan
Can we use some leverage to get the rights for integration of locally developed AESA and EW suite into our F-16 fleet? This upgrade should be developed from BLK 3's tech.
No. The F-16 is a Lockheed Martin product and only Lockheed Martin approved systems can go into it. Tampering with it otherwise will not only void any future support on the product but also damage our relationship with the manufacturer and the US.
Dont know if it is in Paris but this particular picture was first seen in October 2012!Is this on display at Paris now? PAS15.
Because they were ISRAEL and they got permission to integrate some home grown systems into there F-16sThat wasn't the case with Israel, furthermore what if Pakistan manages to create a different version of the systems integrated in the future JF-17, and get it verified?, and then integrate it into the then "older" planes of our F-16 fleet. Will that work?.
Because they were ISRAEL and they got permission to integrate some home grown systems into there F-16s
Dont know if it is in Paris but this particular picture was first seen in October 2012!
laser sensor - PAFwallpapers Blog
Because they were ISRAEL and they got permission to integrate some home grown systems into there F-16s
That wasn't the case with Israel, furthermore what if Pakistan manages to create a different version of the systems integrated in the future JF-17, and get it verified?, and then integrate it into the then "older" planes of our F-16 fleet. Will that work?.
if your radar can not "talk" to the other sensors and weapons on the platform, then it would be useless. To be able to "talk" with all these other systems and weapons it should be able to "talk" in the same "language" for which you need the source codes, which we don't have and will not have.
surely not PAS15 as you can see in the link the article that have THIS image is from October 2012. Don't know if the same were there in this air show but if they were we still haven't seen a picture of that. From marketing point of view, if that project is still active and there are any chances of integrating this with Blk-1 or even Blk-2 in future, PAF must have carried these for display at least, should have. Four SD-10 will be twice as good as two SD-10sNot PAS15
for that you will have to share your technology with them and that PAF wont want! Also as @Tempest II have said, it is financially not feasible for the manufacturer (read Lockheed Martin in this case)But what about getting the product verified?, and then integrate it.
View attachment 231583
This always look to me as a dedicated EW Pod hard point on frontal fuselage. I hope we will see one active around the same place in Block-III. Along with multiple ejector rails for SD-10 this dedicated hard point will address the lack of fire power issue with JF-17.
where are dual racketwith SD-10 & PL-5 live rounds
View attachment 231520 View attachment 231521
Training rounds of SD-10 & PL-5, C-802 is a live round (if I am not mistaken)
View attachment 231522
Credit to UsmanS of pakdef
No. The F-16 is a Lockheed Martin product and only Lockheed Martin approved systems can go into it. Tampering with it otherwise will not only void any future support on the product but also damage our relationship with the manufacturer and the US.