Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, the French still don't have a firm contract in hand, from India. Would have been better if they had supplied PAF what it wanted, in those 6-8 years that it took India to get the (still pending) contract.
Well said. Wondering what would happen to India's repo as a buyer if by any chance rafale deals is abandoned.Actually, the French still don't have a firm contract in hand, from India. Would have been better if they had supplied PAF what it wanted, in those 6-8 years that it took India to get the (still pending) contract.
This last toying may cost them if it doesn't go through No one will take them seriously next time in case they abandon the Rafale deal.Thats funny as hell really, they toyed French to toy PAF, then toyed again by dangling them in Rafale deal and still not committed to it.
Well said. Wondering what would happen to India's repo as a buyer if by any chance rafale deals is abandoned.
Maybe but if I am not wrong final verdict on Rafale came in 2012? Considering it already took 4-5 years wasn't TOT suppose to be part of agreement?India will definitely go for Rafale there is no alternative ... Yes Delay is there, but for a good cause... It is a huge contract.. The deal is not just acquiring jets.. But bringing french tech to India to boost our self reliance.. If ToT is not part of the deal, we might sealed the deal years ago...
Maybe but if I am not wrong final verdict on Rafale came in 2012? Considering it already took 4-5 years wasn't TOT suppose to be part of agreement?
Names are good enough for me. A HUD is a HUD. A HUD is not a reflector sight.
It may incorporate light weight composites in in the airframe.i have a question
since blk 2 is suppose to have a few more new gadgets, wouldn't that decrease thrust to weight ratio even further?
And I'm pretty sure, to keep the cost down, PAF won't be using much plastic in the air frame construction.
Maybe but if I am not wrong final verdict on Rafale came in 2012? Considering it already took 4-5 years wasn't TOT suppose to be part of agreement?
TOT was very much part of the deal but what we r currently negotiating is the level of TOT we'll get in AESA radar, Spectra EW n even engine.
Plus the 50% offset clause also need to be worked out carefully as we don't want to end up as another Saudi Arabia.
I read.
The question was who gives TOT for AESA radar. Also what does TOT means.
The answer was a typical nonsense.
New Recruit