What's new

JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 5]

Status
Not open for further replies.
. .
Take it to the other thread OP, the engine power is enough but the cooling is a factor. Ofcourse so is the cost.
 
.
PAF 26 Squadron Black Spiders playing around with new payloads in Chengdu, China:china::pakistan:
 

Attachments

  • be13b8e1jw1ejgk3arinfj20rs0ik75t.jpg
    be13b8e1jw1ejgk3arinfj20rs0ik75t.jpg
    59.9 KB · Views: 32,239
. .
Take it to the other thread OP, the engine power is enough but the cooling is a factor. Ofcourse so is the cost.

AESA requires better cooling, that much is true, but the reason for that being an issue on the JF-17 is probably space for AESA's cooling equipment. The engine only feeds a tiny tiny fraction of it's power for this.
 
. .
In a nutshell: an old but up to date article on the JF-17


"Yet, when even the most ardent followers of the program had thought that the JF-17 had fully evolved, it has once again surprised all of us in its next evolution. It is likely that this evolution is going to take shape after the second batch. Changes are comprehensive and across the board and include greater range, lower RCS, AESA radar and a new engine with greater TWR (thrust to weight ratio).

The lower RCS is to be reached using new materials, including advanced composites. A new RAM paint is also rumored that is said to be similar to that being used on the F-35. The nose will see comprehensive redesign and is rumored to incorporate a new AESA radar set of Chinese origin. One proposition is that the single tail is replaced with twin-tails similar to the F-35. A new DSI is also projected that will further lower RCS.

The stealthier JF-17 will incorporate a larger wing, improving higher altitude maneuverability. This is a crucial aspect that is increasingly becoming important in BVR combat, where the higher and faster jets can in some form take pot shots at slower and lower BVR platforms. Another aspect of the larger wing will be increased internal fuel carrying capacity. This is addresses one of the areas that the JF-17 is weaker in - range and the ability to stay on station longer.

The nose, vital areas of the cockpit as well as a whole host of other technical areas will be addressed. the nose will in fact be fully redesigned around a new AESA radar and be formated to lower RCS. The DSI design is also being redesigned to better accommodate and optimize higher altitudes and higher speeds. A second generation of the onboard information collection, dissemination and display will be incorporated."

The article left me salivating. Please let it be true. :bounce:
 
. .
AESA requires better cooling, that much is true, but the reason for that being an issue on the JF-17 is probably space for AESA's cooling equipment. The engine only feeds a tiny tiny fraction of it's power for this.

Cooling is the issue which is due to lack of space. Engine requirement is for excess hardpoints and load bearing capacity.
 
.
"Yet, when even the most ardent followers of the program had thought that the JF-17 had fully evolved, it has once again surprised all of us in its next evolution. It is likely that this evolution is going to take shape after the second batch. Changes are comprehensive and across the board and include greater range, lower RCS, AESA radar and a new engine with greater TWR (thrust to weight ratio).

The lower RCS is to be reached using new materials, including advanced composites. A new RAM paint is also rumored that is said to be similar to that being used on the F-35. The nose will see comprehensive redesign and is rumored to incorporate a new AESA radar set of Chinese origin. One proposition is that the single tail is replaced with twin-tails similar to the F-35. A new DSI is also projected that will further lower RCS.

The stealthier JF-17 will incorporate a larger wing, improving higher altitude maneuverability. This is a crucial aspect that is increasingly becoming important in BVR combat, where the higher and faster jets can in some form take pot shots at slower and lower BVR platforms. Another aspect of the larger wing will be increased internal fuel carrying capacity. This is addresses one of the areas that the JF-17 is weaker in - range and the ability to stay on station longer.

The nose, vital areas of the cockpit as well as a whole host of other technical areas will be addressed. the nose will in fact be fully redesigned around a new AESA radar and be formated to lower RCS. The DSI design is also being redesigned to better accommodate and optimize higher altitudes and higher speeds. A second generation of the onboard information collection, dissemination and display will be incorporated."

The article left me salivating. Please let it be true. :bounce:

Low RCS and Stealth is different... what ever you mentioned is quite expensive for PAF...Don't include JFT with F-35.... I don't think JFT gonna be stealthy.... because it makes no sense to call a jet with external payload as Stealth JET.... you are suggesting whole new redesign of JFT .... it is better to invest in J-31.... What ever your wish list is too costly to get in J-17....
 
.
Low RCS and Stealth is different... what ever you mentioned is quite expensive for PAF...Don't include JFT with F-35.... I don't think JFT gonna be stealthy.... because it makes no sense to call a jet with external payload as Stealth JET.... you are suggesting whole new redesign of JFT .... it is better to invest in J-31.... What ever your wish list is too costly to get in J-17....

Ever heard of an enclosed weapons pod?

advanced_super-hornet.jpg


Yes it does involve a significant re-design and no it may not be better to invest in a J-31. The JFT program brings its own unique advantages.

Also I will mention the name of the Thunder alongside whichever jet fighter I damn well please.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom